Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#783 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
6.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-33% greener
B
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
752 CSCL VENUS
IMO 9467251
13,300 TEU 2011
6.5
B
751 ONE HANGZHOU BAY
IMO 9566394
8,974 TEU 2012
6.5
B
753 MAERSK LAGUNA
IMO 9526942
7,450 TEU 2012
6.5
B
754 CMA CGM KHAO SOK
IMO 9925837
5,940 TEU 2023
6.5
B
755 MSC CANDICE
IMO 9339284
9,200 TEU 2007
6.5
B
758 MSC MELINE
IMO 9702077
8,800 TEU 2015
6.5
B
757 NYK VEGA
IMO 9312781
9,012 TEU 2006
6.5
B
756 MSC ELEONORA III
IMO 9064750
2,480 TEU 1994
6.5
B
760 CALLAO EXPRESS
IMO 9777606
10,818 TEU 2016
6.6
B
759 XIAMEN EXPRESS
IMO 9630420
10,000 TEU 2015
6.6
B
762 CMA CGM FORT JAMES
IMO 9966764
7,600 TEU 2024
6.6
B
761 W KAMPALA
IMO 9215311
6,802 TEU 2001
6.6
B
763 ONE HELSINKI
IMO 9588081
8,930 TEU 2012
6.6
B
764 MSC YASHI B
IMO 9778090
11,000 TEU 2018
6.6
B
768 MSC TEXAS
IMO 9318058
8,204 TEU 2006
6.6
B
765 MSC JUDITH
IMO 9299549
8,034 TEU 2006
6.6
B
767 HYUNDAI FORCE
IMO 9347566
8,566 TEU 2008
6.6
B
766 MSC NITYA B
IMO 9778117
11,000 TEU 2017
6.6
B
771 MAERSK LABREA
IMO 9527063
8,700 TEU 2013
6.6
B
770 GUAYAQUIL EXPRESS
IMO 9777620
10,818 TEU 2017
6.6
B
769 MSC TEMA VIII
IMO 9983669
8,182 TEU 2024
6.6
B
772 COSCO PORTUGAL
IMO 9516466
13,386 TEU 2014
6.6
B
774 CMA CGM CENDRILLON
IMO 9449819
8,500 TEU 2009
6.6
B
773 MAERSK SALALAH
IMO 9352016
8,400 TEU 2008
6.6
B
775 ZIM MOONSTONE
IMO 9968073
7,000 TEU 2024
6.6
B
777 HUBERT SCHULTE
IMO 9535204
5,605 TEU 2012
6.6
B
776 MAERSK LA PAZ
IMO 9526899
7,450 TEU 2011
6.6
B
778 ONE HUMEN
IMO 9302164
8,212 TEU 2007
6.7
B
779 MAERSK LINS
IMO 9527025
8,700 TEU 2012
6.7
B
781 MSC EVEREST VIII
IMO 9286231
7,747 TEU 2004
6.7
B
780 MSC ELMA
IMO 9735218
9,400 TEU 2016
6.7
B
782 MSC FLORENTINA
IMO 9251705
6,750 TEU 2003
6.7
B
784 ANTHEA Y
IMO 9710244
9,000 TEU 2015
6.7
B
783 MAERSK MEMPHIS
IMO 9348651
6,188 TEU 2007
6.7
B
785 GUDRUN MAERSK
IMO 9302877
7,668 TEU 2005
6.7
B
786 OOCL SEOUL
IMO 9417244
8,063 TEU 2010
6.7
B
787 MSC TORONTO
IMO 9299525
8,034 TEU 2006
6.7
B
788 SPEED
IMO 9475698
13,100 TEU 2012
6.7
B
792 COSCO DENMARK
IMO 9516478
13,360 TEU 2014
6.7
B
794 NYK VENUS
IMO 9312793
9,012 TEU 2007
6.7
B
791 ONE HOUSTON
IMO 9566382
8,930 TEU 2012
6.7
B
790 MSC SOFIA CELESTE
IMO 9702091
8,800 TEU 2015
6.7
B
789 APL SAVANNAH
IMO 9597513
9,200 TEU 2010
6.7
B
793 ONE HONG KONG
IMO 9395161
8,212 TEU 2009
6.7
B
795 EVER FOREVER
IMO 9850575
11,000 TEU 2020
6.7
B
798 NYK DEMETER
IMO 9337664
4,888 TEU 2007
6.7
B
797 ONE READINESS
IMO 9952684
7,000 TEU 2023
6.7
B
796 JASPER
IMO 9968061
7,000 TEU 2024
6.7
B
800 NYK RUMINA
IMO 9416991
4,888 TEU 2010
6.7
B
799 POTOMAC EXPRESS
IMO 9349526
6,435 TEU 2008
6.7
B
Page 16 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.