Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,021 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-11% greener
D

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1001 ADVANTAGE SUN
IMO 9513141
156,644 2012
4.6
D
1002 OTIS
IMO 9408217
156,717 2010
4.6
D
1003 LYRIC CAMELLIA
IMO 9730933
109,999 2016
4.6
D
1004 FLAGSHIP ORCHID
IMO 9456939
74,577 2012
4.6
D
1005 HAFNIA CATERINA
IMO 9688427
49,999 2013
4.6
D
1006 DELTA BLUE
IMO 9601235
158,322 2012
4.6
D
1007 SOLAR MADELEIN
IMO 9882413
49,990 2020
4.6
D
1008 PIURA PACIFIC
IMO 9983889
49,806 2022
4.6
D
1009 FAITHFUL WARRIOR
IMO 9750062
149,992 2014
4.6
D
1010 ABU DHABI-III
IMO 9489027
105,131 2011
4.6
D
1011 PGC ALEXANDRIA
IMO 9336505
74,996 2006
4.6
D
1012 MARAN ATLAS
IMO 9414022
105,071 2006
4.6
D
1013 HAFNIA SHENZHEN
IMO 9863223
74,999 2020
4.6
D
1014 ALIAI
IMO 9884813
50,315 2021
4.6
D
1015 STAVANGER PEARL
IMO 9839090
49,999 2020
4.6
D
1016 LARGO EXCELLENCE
IMO 9935923
49,999 2023
4.6
D
1017 AQUALEGEND
IMO 9592240
115,571 2010
4.6
D
1018 ADVANTAGE PORTO CERVO
IMO 9794850
75,144 2019
4.6
D
1019 RAFFLES HARMONY
IMO 9607734
105,405 2013
4.6
D
1020 ALICANTE
IMO 9527855
115,707 2008
4.6
D
1021 BRIOLETTE
IMO 9524982
104,588 2011
4.6
D
1022 LIRICA
IMO 9302982
150,205 2006
4.6
D
1023 PROTEUS PHILIPPA
IMO 9923425
109,999 2022
4.6
D
1024 LEYTE SPIRIT
IMO 9484089
109,670 2008
4.6
D
1025 PORTOFINO
IMO 9564671
74,905 2010
4.6
D
1026 MAERSK TACOMA
IMO 9708617
49,990 2013
4.7
D
1027 GAMSUNORO
IMO 9677313
105,638 2014
4.7
D
1028 CHRYSALIS
IMO 9437684
115,867 2010
4.7
D
1029 GRIMSTAD
IMO 9336402
105,850 2007
4.7
D
1030 MARGARITA
IMO 9426594
74,998 2006
4.7
D
1031 OLAVO BILAC
IMO 9547697
114,481 2018
4.7
D
1032 UOG IOANNIS V
IMO 9485629
73,338 2008
4.7
D
1033 PACIFIC ANNA
IMO 9772010
109,999 2017
4.7
D
1034 SEA PUMA
IMO 9802176
114,560 2019
4.7
D
1035 EAGLE BALDER
IMO 9833113
128,427 2020
4.7
D
1036 ORIENT INNOVATION
IMO 9793387
49,997 2017
4.7
D
1037 MAERSK CALLAO
IMO 9786152
49,919 2018
4.7
D
1038 ST. CLEMENS
IMO 9790361
49,998 2017
4.7
D
1039 AEGEAN HARMONY
IMO 9338917
115,824 2007
4.7
D
1040 ATHINA
IMO 9884253
49,999 2020
4.7
D
1041 BANI YAS
IMO 9487249
74,913 2010
4.7
D
1042 MARI BOYLE
IMO 9732979
49,999 2016
4.7
D
1043 AQUILA L
IMO 9829411
49,999 2018
4.7
D
1044 ALQADISIA
IMO 9343352
115,577 2008
4.8
D
1045 HAFNIA COUGAR
IMO 9675494
49,999 2014
4.8
D
1046 UOG HERMES
IMO 9550694
73,410 2009
4.8
D
1047 PENELOP
IMO 9325908
115,091 2006
4.8
D
1048 PROMITHEAS
IMO 9305611
117,055 2006
4.8
D
1049 LARGO ALPHA
IMO 1031109
49,834 2025
4.8
D
1050 ADAM
IMO 9826732
113,226 2018
4.8
D
Page 21 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.