TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#375 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-35% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 625 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

119
Q4
133
'27 Q1
85
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
136
'27 Q4
136
'28 Q1
94
'28 Q2
112
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,971 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,921 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,886 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,886 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,872 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,828 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,147
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,873–11,643M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,147 of 1,147 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.48 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
351 PRAIRIE
IMO 9860506
81,614 2019
3.1
A
350 CSSC AMSTERDAM
IMO 9853890
120,566 2020
3.1
A
349 OUTLANDER
IMO 9218337
45,526 2000
3.1
A
354 HSL TAMPA
IMO 9781035
81,818 2017
3.1
A
357 AOM ELENA
IMO 9970246
82,550 2024
3.1
A
356 MEDI ARGENTARIO
IMO 9771298
89,499 2018
3.1
A
355 NAVIOS ALEGRIA
IMO 9757785
84,852 2016
3.1
A
358 SAKIZAYA QUEEN
IMO 9783148
81,858 2018
3.1
A
359 EMERALD PUTUO
IMO 9936240
85,610 2022
3.1
A
364 SM SAMCHEONPO
IMO 9842487
80,943 2019
3.1
A
363 MEDI PALMAROLA
IMO 9802205
81,874 2018
3.1
A
362 PINCHAT
IMO 9758466
81,828 2018
3.1
A
361 PREGNY
IMO 9925746
82,628 2022
3.1
A
360 KARPATY
IMO 9582506
82,138 2013
3.1
A
366 KMAX RULER
IMO 9436642
91,800 2009
3.1
A
365 URSULA MANX
IMO 9900095
82,561 2021
3.1
A
369 ALBA
IMO 9493755
175,232 2012
3.1
A
372 MORNING CLOUD
IMO 9532197
74,962 2011
3.1
A
368 MEDI EOLIE
IMO 9728186
81,845 2016
3.1
A
371 ALBATROSS
IMO 9937256
82,411 2023
3.1
A
367 CORNALIN
IMO 9947263
82,403 2023
3.1
A
370 THALASSINI AVRA
IMO 9500704
180,643 2011
3.1
A
373 CHARM LOONG
IMO 9464390
76,636 2008
3.2
A
374 ENERGY GLORY
IMO 9518074
82,123 2013
3.2
A
375 LOWLANDS SKY
IMO 9933262
82,281 2023
3.2
A
387 MOUDROS
IMO 9952414
82,177 2022
3.2
A
386 BABITONGA
IMO 9858292
81,770 2019
3.2
A
385 EMERALD DAISHAN
IMO 9981295
85,516 2023
3.2
A
384 ETG AQUARIUS
IMO 9928384
81,976 2022
3.2
A
383 BW NARA
IMO 9836373
81,759 2020
3.2
A
382 LEMAN TRADER
IMO 9846093
82,192 2019
3.2
A
381 MAPLE WISDOM
IMO 9964663
82,253 2023
3.2
A
380 SERENDIPITY
IMO 9906465
82,298 2021
3.2
A
379 AQUAPRIMA
IMO 9933248
82,270 2022
3.2
A
378 DORIC KATANA
IMO 9897585
82,448 2021
3.2
A
377 ROSTRUM CYNIC
IMO 9955909
82,216 2023
3.2
A
376 LOWLANDS IYO
IMO 9987249
82,019 2024
3.2
A
388 LOWLANDS AMBITION
IMO 9947287
82,400 2024
3.2
A
390 NORDIC SIKU
IMO 9895800
95,758 2021
3.2
A
392 CSSC CAPE TOWN
IMO 9853888
120,578 2020
3.2
A
391 KYPROS SEA
IMO 9675602
77,128 2014
3.2
A
389 CL HUAIHUA
IMO 9953353
64,784 2024
3.2
A
395 JAG AALOK
IMO 9706566
82,023 2016
3.2
A
398 YANGZE 6
IMO 9718909
63,478 2014
3.2
A
397 ARISTOTELES GRAECIA
IMO 9843766
82,096 2020
3.2
A
396 SHINE PEARL
IMO 9971496
82,427 2024
3.2
A
394 SUDETY
IMO 9582518
82,138 2013
3.2
A
393 ASCANIOS
IMO 9276169
76,878 2004
3.2
A
400 KRISTIAN OLDENDORFF
IMO 9952505
82,143 2024
3.2
A
399 ROSTRUM SCEPTIC
IMO 9955923
82,191 2024
3.2
A
Page 8 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.