Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,812 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
14.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+44% higher
E
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1801 MSC TIANA F
IMO 9108398
1,129 TEU 1996
14.2
E
1802 MSC KUWAIT III
IMO 9226413
2,462 TEU 2001
14.2
E
1803 ERASMUS GOAL
IMO 9626558
1,805 TEU 2013
14.2
E
1804 NEPTUNE MATUA
IMO 9670119
2,190 TEU 2015
14.2
E
1805 PORTSMOUTH
IMO 9302437
2,478 TEU 2004
14.2
E
1806 UAFL RACER
IMO 9334818
1,740 TEU 2007
14.2
E
1807 DOUCE FRANCE
IMO 9845661
2,200 TEU 2020
14.3
E
1808 APL SAIPAN
IMO 9239850
1,638 TEU 2002
14.3
E
1809 CHIQUITA MERCHANT
IMO 9344631
1,819 TEU 2007
14.3
E
1810 ESPERANCE
IMO 9491484
1,349 TEU 2011
14.3
E
1811 RAQUEL S
IMO 9515591
1,577 TEU 2009
14.3
E
1812 VALENCIA EXPRESS
IMO 9108130
2,400 TEU 1996
14.3
E
1813 DJANET
IMO 9845063
1,500 TEU 2020
14.3
E
1814 MARINA L
IMO 9431331
1,300 TEU 2009
14.3
E
1815 TRADEWIND
IMO 9367944
907 TEU 2007
14.3
E
1816 CMA CGM FORT ST PIERRE
IMO 9261891
2,226 TEU 2003
14.4
E
1817 ALEXANDER B
IMO 9328649
1,200 TEU 2006
14.4
E
1818 CIRTA
IMO 9845051
1,500 TEU 2020
14.4
E
1819 GRANDE MEDITERRANEO
IMO 9138393
716 TEU 1998
14.4
E
1820 AS PENELOPE
IMO 9294537
2,572 TEU 2005
14.5
E
1821 MEDKON RIZE
IMO 9114347
652 TEU 1996
14.5
E
1822 GRANDE DAKAR
IMO 9680724
1,800 TEU 2015
14.5
E
1823 ST. JOHN
IMO 9634646
1,700 TEU 2014
14.6
E
1824 MSC RUTH F
IMO 9212034
1,216 TEU 2000
14.6
E
1825 ELBTOWER
IMO 9968918
1,400 TEU 2021
14.6
E
1826 MSC NITA
IMO 9084607
1,512 TEU 1996
14.6
E
1827 CMA CGM CAYENNE
IMO 9709192
2,100 TEU 2015
14.6
E
1828 MEDKON SIA
IMO 9306249
1,100 TEU 2004
14.7
E
1829 JUDITH BORCHARD
IMO 1016575
17,498 2024
14.7
E
1830 MOLIVA
IMO 9454034
951 TEU 2014
14.7
E
1831 GRANDE ATLANTICO
IMO 9130951
1,302 TEU 1999
14.7
E
1832 DETTIFOSS
IMO 9822853
2,150 TEU 2020
14.8
E
1833 HANSA ROTENBURG
IMO 9401673
1,740 TEU 2009
14.8
E
1834 AURETTE A
IMO 9242285
1,170 TEU 2002
14.8
E
1835 YM INVENTIVE
IMO 9319105
1,805 TEU 2007
14.8
E
1836 AS FREYA
IMO 9292436
1,200 TEU 2004
14.8
E
1837 GRANDE CONGO
IMO 9437921
800 TEU 2010
14.9
E
1838 EAGLE II
IMO 9301122
1,300 TEU 2006
14.9
E
1839 GRANDE AFRICA
IMO 9130949
1,302 TEU 1998
14.9
E
1840 JONNI RITSCHER
IMO 9333383
1,856 TEU 2006
15.0
E
1841 SONDERBORG
IMO 9454242
1,085 TEU 2012
15.0
E
1842 PANDA 003
IMO 9968891
1,400 TEU 2024
15.0
E
1843 SPRING C
IMO 9308027
3,500 TEU 2007
15.0
E
1844 GRANDE EUROPA
IMO 9138381
712 TEU 1998
15.1
E
1845 GRANDE SAN PAOLO
IMO 9253208
1,321 TEU 2003
15.2
E
1846 EMOTION
IMO 9359258
1,440 TEU 2008
15.2
E
1847 CMA CGM KOUROU
IMO 9845659
2,200 TEU 2020
15.2
E
1848 DIANE A
IMO 9385532
1,604 TEU 2008
15.2
E
1849 CMA CGM MARSEILLE
IMO 9709207
2,100 TEU 2015
15.2
E
1850 CMA CGM ABIDJAN
IMO 9323481
1,740 TEU 2006
15.2
E
Page 37 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.