Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,051 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
16.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
+52% higher
E

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 CDRY BLACK
IMO 9504633
8,537 2011
16.5
E
1052 BOCS PASSION
IMO 9500065
12,906 2010
16.6
E
1053 GABRIELA H
IMO 9147863
6,790 1998
16.6
E
1054 MARGARETHA
IMO 9240548
10,526 2002
16.6
E
1055 M/V MANISA SOLE
IMO 9306304
8,211 2006
16.6
E
1056 DINTELBORG
IMO 9163685
8,832 1999
16.6
E
1057 PIETERSGRACHT
IMO 9448384
19,863 2012
16.7
E
1058 HAPPY STAR
IMO 9661259
18,062 2014
16.7
E
1059 PROPUS
IMO 9133757
9,387 1997
16.7
E
1060 PIJLGRACHT
IMO 9448358
19,379 2011
16.7
E
1061 MARBELLA
IMO 9406958
8,546 2008
16.7
E
1062 TANGO REY
IMO 9214185
8,600 2001
16.7
E
1063 FWN PROVIDER
IMO 9770713
10,620 2017
16.7
E
1064 PUKA
IMO 9374973
12,016 2007
16.7
E
1065 SAFI M
IMO 8502470
9,650 1985
16.8
E
1066 SEVEN AMARANTA
IMO 9306445
8,259 2007
16.8
E
1067 HALLAND
IMO 9436238
6,805 2008
16.8
E
1068 HAPPY SKY
IMO 9457220
17,683 2013
16.8
E
1069 SDS RED
IMO 9365518
8,546 2010
16.8
E
1070 COE ANNA
IMO 9366160
9,231 2012
16.8
E
1071 MANISA SILVANA
IMO 9306316
8,515 2006
16.8
E
1072 VICTORIA
IMO 9523926
8,546 2010
16.9
E
1073 MANISA EMY / LEUVEBORG
IMO 9421063
8,656 2008
16.9
E
1074 VERTOM MERIDIAAN
IMO 9385881
8,045 2010
16.9
E
1075 ROIBEIRA
IMO 9414187
7,781 2007
16.9
E
1076 MANISA BELLA / LENNEBORG
IMO 9421075
8,668 2008
16.9
E
1077 HAPPY RIVER
IMO 9139294
15,443 1997
16.9
E
1078 KARELIS-72
IMO 9433690
6,917 2008
17.0
E
1079 MUNTGRACHT
IMO 9571545
11,736 2012
17.0
E
1080 KARELIS-71
IMO 9383883
6,882 2006
17.0
E
1081 AUJAQ
IMO 9081320
12,730 1994
17.0
E
1082 FRISIANA
IMO 9385893
8,027 2010
17.0
E
1083 SIDER SONJA
IMO 9432505
8,546 2008
17.1
E
1084 BILLIE
IMO 9488047
12,696 2011
17.1
E
1085 SDS GREEN
IMO 9504621
8,537 2010
17.1
E
1086 FLORETGRACHT
IMO 9507611
12,067 2012
17.1
E
1087 AK AMBITION
IMO 9306421
8,259 2006
17.1
E
1088 MANISA BALU
IMO 9391036
8,450 2008
17.2
E
1089 RUDOLF
IMO 9535591
10,872 2010
17.2
E
1090 PONTICA
IMO 9681974
9,005 2014
17.3
E
1091 ALEKSANDR ANTONOV
IMO 8972261
6,088 1986
17.3
E
1092 PLANTIJNGRACHT
IMO 9424572
19,330 2010
17.3
E
1093 ASG KHERSON
IMO 9255579
7,796 2002
17.3
E
1094 FRISIAN OCEAN
IMO 9385922
8,029 2011
17.3
E
1095 POOLGRACHT
IMO 9448360
19,381 2011
17.4
E
1096 MORAIME
IMO 9423853
7,126 2008
17.4
E
1097 PALEISGRACHT
IMO 9448346
19,496 2011
17.4
E
1098 SEA TRADER
IMO 9364007
6,355 2007
17.4
E
1099 JOE
IMO 9351153
7,750 2007
17.5
E
1100 ALEXANDRA
IMO 9196163
8,865 2000
17.6
E
Page 22 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.