Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#2,833 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
6.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+28% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 561 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,601 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,492 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 2,492 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,098
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,098 of 1,098 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2801 CAPE GULL
IMO 9674804
36,320 2013
6.1
D
2802 ARKLOW SPRAY
IMO 9649548
34,919 2014
6.1
D
2803 JAY
IMO 9441336
57,809 2010
6.1
D
2804 BAR
IMO 9693496
36,048 2014
6.1
D
2805 GULLWING
IMO 9595981
37,009 2013
6.1
D
2806 CARME
IMO 9697961
35,906 2014
6.1
D
2807 ZHEN XIANG 9
IMO 9541825
58,474 2012
6.2
D
2808 CL SEVEN
IMO 9607576
50,630 2011
6.2
D
2809 VIPHA NAREE
IMO 9722027
38,851 2015
6.2
D
2810 SKY GATE
IMO 9445136
28,397 2008
6.2
D
2811 CANADIAN BULKER
IMO 9855422
39,541 2019
6.2
D
2812 HANZE GENDT
IMO 9605176
35,845 2012
6.2
D
2813 MINDANAO
IMO 9478963
55,696 2006
6.2
D
2814 AGIA MARINA
IMO 9700562
33,398 2014
6.2
D
2815 ORHAN
IMO 9625451
35,138 2013
6.2
D
2816 ASL LUNA
IMO 9662423
37,070 2011
6.2
D
2817 SIDER PERA
IMO 9633202
38,218 2012
6.2
D
2818 ROADRUNNER
IMO 9438042
54,057 2008
6.2
D
2819 AHSOKA
IMO 9669976
36,334 2013
6.2
D
2820 EAGLE
IMO 9490674
58,018 2010
6.2
D
2821 WHITE WANDERER
IMO 9621869
37,869 2012
6.2
D
2822 NORDLOIRE
IMO 9596026
37,212 2013
6.2
D
2823 NAVIOS CHRISTINE B
IMO 9496238
58,058 2009
6.2
D
2824 BLUE SAPPHIRE
IMO 9877339
38,580 2020
6.2
D
2825 FOUR NABUCCO
IMO 9450650
36,438 2010
6.2
D
2826 BOGDAN
IMO 9905710
32,167 2021
6.2
E
2827 ASPRI
IMO 9658771
33,371 2014
6.2
E
2828 SCOTLAND BAY
IMO 9276200
28,446 2004
6.2
E
2829 MAZURY
IMO 9285122
38,981 2005
6.2
E
2830 AFRICAN SHRIKE
IMO 9715218
39,728 2015
6.2
E
2831 PAULA TRADER
IMO 9855458
39,498 2020
6.2
E
2832 BARBRO G
IMO 9546796
29,975 2010
6.2
E
2833 R SKYWALKER
IMO 9610248
36,332 2013
6.2
E
2834 ADASTAR
IMO 9701231
34,334 2015
6.2
E
2835 STELLAR TRADER
IMO 9628817
35,946 2013
6.2
E
2836 MOUNT TARANAKI
IMO 9361782
33,510 2009
6.2
E
2837 JIU FENG LING
IMO 9505443
32,033 2011
6.2
E
2838 ER NAZIRE
IMO 9578543
56,716 2010
6.2
E
2839 BUNUN BENEFIT
IMO 9747144
37,372 2019
6.2
E
2840 FRIEDERIKE SCHULTE
IMO 9721425
40,058 2015
6.2
E
2841 YANGZE 32
IMO 9617612
47,020 2012
6.2
E
2842 ASIA MINOR
IMO 9754161
39,094 2019
6.2
E
2843 KASHKAR
IMO 9285029
38,890 2005
6.2
E
2844 STRATEGIC EQUITY
IMO 9689902
39,880 2014
6.2
E
2845 PELAGIANI
IMO 9282613
35,313 2004
6.2
E
2846 KIBO
IMO 9719331
38,896 2015
6.2
E
2847 ILENAO
IMO 9524683
55,442 2010
6.2
E
2848 SUPER SAKA
IMO 9456551
55,596 2011
6.2
E
2849 AEOLOS
IMO 9228382
32,256 2001
6.2
E
2850 CETUS BELUGA
IMO 9670743
43,413 2015
6.2
E
Page 57 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.