Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,753 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
17.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
+24% higher
D

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1751 FAROMAR
IMO 9552070
5,234 2012
17.3
D
1752 ZEKO Y
IMO 8027573
8,528 1981
17.3
D
1753 BBC BAHRAIN
IMO 9578751
7,967 2012
17.4
D
1754 LAPPLAND
IMO 9505132
6,500 2020
17.4
D
1755 ILKA
IMO 8504947
1,925 1985
17.4
D
1756 WILSON MOSEL
IMO 9060687
2,665 1993
17.4
D
1757 WILSON PALDISKI
IMO 9373527
4,905 2007
17.4
D
1758 WILSON GRIP
IMO 9126912
3,884 1996
17.4
D
1759 VESTVIND
IMO 9750579
10,238 2016
17.4
D
1760 RIX AMETHYST
IMO 9173185
2,953 1999
17.4
D
1761 FRISIAN OCTA
IMO 9526095
8,284 2010
17.4
D
1762 HEINZ G.
IMO 9536521
3,798 2011
17.4
D
1763 ARKLOW VALOUR
IMO 9772565
5,159 2017
17.4
D
1764 ST. SOFIA
IMO 9419008
16,577 2011
17.5
D
1765 BBC LIVORNO
IMO 9570670
7,933 2012
17.5
D
1766 NOORDVLIET
IMO 9518220
3,850 2013
17.5
D
1767 BBC BANGKOK
IMO 9437165
8,046 2011
17.5
D
1768 CELINA
IMO 9019200
6,182 2001
17.5
D
1769 FRISIAN OCEAN
IMO 9385922
8,029 2001
17.5
D
1770 BBC GDANSK
IMO 9436965
7,787 2009
17.5
D
1771 PREGOL HAV
IMO 8519239
2,291 1985
17.5
D
1772 DINTELBORG
IMO 9163685
8,832 1999
17.5
D
1773 WILSON LISTA
IMO 9117208
3,944 1994
17.5
D
1774 RIX MISTRAL
IMO 9173513
3,720 1997
17.5
D
1775 SDS GREEN
IMO 9504621
8,537 2010
17.5
D
1776 MIRAMAR
IMO 9552044
5,233 2011
17.5
D
1777 PLANTIJNGRACHT
IMO 9424572
19,330 2010
17.5
D
1778 FAST JEF
IMO 9136101
3,202 1996
17.5
D
1779 RIX BAY
IMO 9017410
4,279 1998
17.6
D
1780 SWAMI
IMO 9100126
4,304 1995
17.6
D
1781 MANISA KATE / LOENERBORG
IMO 9421099
8,111 2008
17.6
D
1782 ARUCAS
IMO 9197492
5,767 2001
17.6
D
1783 RHEINTAL
IMO 9375903
3,689 2007
17.6
D
1784 ANNIKA
IMO 9000833
3,568 1989
17.6
D
1785 ESTLAND
IMO 9247314
5,464 2002
17.6
D
1786 DELAMAR
IMO 9528500
4,030 2011
17.6
D
1787 LUNAMAR
IMO 9551662
5,134 2010
17.6
D
1788 SCHELDEDIJK
IMO 9514925
4,891 2010
17.6
D
1789 BBC RHONETAL
IMO 9614701
17,577 2013
17.6
D
1790 CELAL SAHIN
IMO 9352157
4,300 2006
17.6
D
1791 BREB COURTESY
IMO 9421130
7,812 2009
17.6
D
1792 WILSON GOOLE
IMO 9126687
3,705 1995
17.6
D
1793 SPANACO RELIABILITY
IMO 9373515
5,000 2007
17.6
D
1794 WILSON HARRIER
IMO 9064891
4,206 1993
17.7
D
1795 SYRENA
IMO 9508641
5,463 2010
17.7
D
1796 MARIA G
IMO 8205187
1,685 1984
17.7
D
1797 KREETE
IMO 9279408
3,999 2003
17.7
D
1798 ORIENTAL
IMO 9085077
5,501 1994
17.7
D
1799 SUURHUSEN.S
IMO 9123245
4,261 1996
17.7
D
1800 VERTOM MARJOLIJN
IMO 9507350
3,584 2010
17.7
D
Page 36 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.