Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#870 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
14.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.91)
+28% higher
D

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.21
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
851 NACC ALICUDI
IMO 9586435
7,694 2011
13.8
D
852 UAL COLOGNE
IMO 9681534
8,736 2014
13.8
D
853 MONTSERRAT
IMO 9213739
9,567 2000
13.8
D
854 MARTINA
IMO 9594286
8,564 2012
13.8
D
855 FRANBO PROSPECT
IMO 9512692
11,008 2010
13.8
D
856 ADRIATICBORG
IMO 9546497
17,294 2011
13.8
D
857 AL UDEID
IMO 9294965
10,508 2004
13.8
D
858 VLISTBORG
IMO 9160346
9,567 1999
13.8
D
859 SOFIA
IMO 9957414
7,896 2024
13.8
D
860 HAPPY DOVER
IMO 9551959
18,074 2011
13.9
D
861 HC MELINA
IMO 9415052
9,198 2011
13.9
D
862 BORE WIND
IMO 9892901
6,792 2022
13.9
D
863 OLIVIA
IMO 9957402
7,896 2024
13.9
D
864 BEAUTRANGA
IMO 9532812
8,250 2011
13.9
D
865 UAL BODEWES
IMO 9542336
8,327 2012
13.9
D
866 MINERVAGRACHT
IMO 9571521
12,176 2011
14.0
D
867 ONEGO NEVA
IMO 9438585
11,087 2008
14.0
D
868 YM FUJI
IMO 9622760
10,952 2015
14.0
D
869 INDUSTRIAL SKIPPER
IMO 9741138
12,329 2016
14.0
D
870 LONGWOLF
IMO 9504126
11,023 2010
14.0
D
871 JAEGER ARROW
IMO 9215347
23,529 2001
14.0
D
872 SOPHIA
IMO 9467017
12,591 2011
14.0
D
873 SCHIPPERSGRACHT
IMO 9197363
21,311 2000
14.0
D
874 LADY VIVIANA
IMO 9320518
11,551 2005
14.0
D
875 ANNAMARIA
IMO 9488633
8,091 2008
14.1
D
876 TANJA
IMO 9534444
10,049 2011
14.1
D
877 VOORNEBORG
IMO 9179373
9,567 1999
14.1
D
878 ARNEBORG
IMO 9333539
17,356 2006
14.1
D
879 KONINGSBORG
IMO 9155925
9,067 1998
14.1
D
880 AMISOS
IMO 9584994
8,716 2011
14.1
D
881 DELTAGRACHT
IMO 9420801
18,143 2009
14.1
D
882 HAMBURG.HS
IMO 9168403
8,889 1997
14.1
D
883 INDUSTRIAL SONG
IMO 9750464
12,292 2017
14.2
D
884 HEEMSKERKGRACHT
IMO 9443669
12,672 2009
14.2
D
885 SABAHAT SONAY
IMO 9370525
14,888 2007
14.2
D
886 KAREWOOD PRIDE
IMO 9281499
6,315 2006
14.2
D
887 LADY JASMIN
IMO 9106974
11,307 1994
14.2
D
888 BBC MARYLAND
IMO 9433298
12,721 2010
14.3
D
889 SAVA
IMO 9158082
8,300 1999
14.3
D
890 DEBBIE
IMO 9488061
12,731 2011
14.3
D
891 VERTOM JOY
IMO 9706865
11,000 2023
14.3
D
892 ONEGO BAYOU
IMO 9369069
11,087 2007
14.3
D
893 MERWEBORG
IMO 9142552
9,732 1997
14.3
D
894 SCHELDEGRACHT
IMO 9202510
21,448 2000
14.3
D
895 MISSISSIPPIBORG
IMO 9207508
9,732 2000
14.3
D
896 TRITO NAVIGATOR
IMO 9631357
8,137 2013
14.3
D
897 BANDURA
IMO 9526071
8,217 2010
14.3
D
898 FATIH
IMO 9381421
8,591 2009
14.4
D
899 STADIONGRACHT
IMO 9202508
21,323 2000
14.4
D
900 LADY DEBORA
IMO 9147875
7,580 1998
14.4
D
Page 18 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.