Most Emission-Efficient Bulk Carriers
Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.
| # | Vessel | Size (DWT) | Built | Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 559 |
AMO
IMO 9296626
|
82,214 | 2006 |
3.4
|
A |
| 558 |
AFRICAN DRAGON
IMO 9990416
|
66,647 | 2024 |
3.4
|
A |
| 557 |
POMONE
IMO 9926130
|
82,247 | 2021 |
3.4
|
A |
| 556 |
ARETI.GR
IMO 9789893
|
60,243 | 2017 |
3.4
|
A |
| 555 |
AQUAGEMINI
IMO 9757010
|
60,238 | 2016 |
3.4
|
A |
| 554 |
HSL NASSAU
IMO 9802310
|
63,805 | 2020 |
3.4
|
A |
| 553 |
ANGLO JESSICA
IMO 9490480
|
114,664 | 2006 |
3.4
|
A |
| 552 |
PEAK MATTERHORN
IMO 9731822
|
81,060 | 2016 |
3.4
|
A |
| 551 |
SPAR CASTOR
IMO 9719666
|
63,270 | 2018 |
3.4
|
A |
| 562 |
GOLDEN ERLING
IMO 9955571
|
85,000 | 2024 |
3.4
|
A |
| 561 |
CRIMSON KINGDOM
IMO 9748033
|
84,860 | 2016 |
3.4
|
A |
| 563 |
DREAM STAR
IMO 9582996
|
81,909 | 2014 |
3.4
|
A |
| 560 |
AQUAGEM
IMO 9950909
|
82,292 | 2023 |
3.4
|
A |
| 568 |
NAVIOS GALILEO
IMO 9326536
|
76,596 | 2006 |
3.4
|
A |
| 565 |
OSHIMA JAPAN
IMO 9872975
|
62,661 | 2021 |
3.4
|
A |
| 564 |
NEW ASCENT
IMO 9512290
|
82,179 | 2012 |
3.4
|
A |
| 567 |
SKOMER ISLAND
IMO 9573854
|
61,510 | 2010 |
3.4
|
A |
| 566 |
KONSTANTINOS D
IMO 9972608
|
63,516 | 2024 |
3.4
|
A |
| 576 |
NORD ANTARES
IMO 9933224
|
82,258 | 2022 |
3.4
|
A |
| 571 |
AL KARAMA
IMO 9801732
|
63,878 | 2019 |
3.4
|
A |
| 577 |
ELATI
IMO 9836490
|
81,746 | 2019 |
3.4
|
A |
| 570 |
MAGMA INTEGRITY
IMO 9967677
|
63,697 | 2022 |
3.4
|
A |
| 569 |
RICHARD OLDENDORFF
IMO 9462366
|
121,354 | 2011 |
3.4
|
A |
| 575 |
CALYPSO V
IMO 9381213
|
76,596 | 2007 |
3.4
|
A |
| 574 |
ARIES KARIN
IMO 9894478
|
64,229 | 2021 |
3.4
|
A |
| 573 |
AMALIA
IMO 9770634
|
81,783 | 2019 |
3.4
|
A |
| 572 |
MAROUDIO
IMO 9815965
|
64,723 | 2022 |
3.4
|
A |
| 581 |
MEGHNA PIONEER
IMO 9894466
|
64,276 | 2020 |
3.4
|
A |
| 580 |
ROYAL HOPE
IMO 9726762
|
81,011 | 2015 |
3.4
|
A |
| 582 |
YASA VENUS
IMO 9848118
|
61,075 | 2019 |
3.4
|
A |
| 579 |
SAKIZAYA DIAMOND
IMO 9697868
|
81,938 | 2013 |
3.4
|
A |
| 585 |
CL GENEVA
IMO 9911587
|
85,229 | 2021 |
3.4
|
A |
| 584 |
KAMILLA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9952452
|
82,245 | 2024 |
3.4
|
A |
| 583 |
JIMMY T
IMO 9782118
|
81,704 | 2017 |
3.4
|
A |
| 578 |
TRANSCENDEN STAR
IMO 9928231
|
84,952 | 2022 |
3.4
|
A |
| 588 |
INCE ANADOLU
IMO 9527271
|
76,619 | 2009 |
3.4
|
A |
| 590 |
MAGSENGER 10
IMO 9497268
|
115,301 | 2012 |
3.4
|
A |
| 587 |
KEY FUTURE
IMO 9512329
|
82,099 | 2012 |
3.4
|
A |
| 593 |
MAMMA MIA
IMO 9846548
|
60,446 | 2015 |
3.4
|
A |
| 592 |
AXIOS
IMO 9706542
|
81,960 | 2017 |
3.4
|
A |
| 586 |
BELMAR
IMO 9908475
|
63,641 | 2021 |
3.4
|
A |
| 589 |
OCEAN TIME
IMO 9848522
|
82,024 | 2019 |
3.4
|
A |
| 591 |
TIANA
IMO 9317470
|
77,283 | 2008 |
3.4
|
A |
| 600 |
AIANTAS
IMO 9729879
|
81,111 | 2016 |
3.4
|
A |
| 599 |
MYRTO
IMO 9518086
|
82,131 | 2013 |
3.4
|
A |
| 598 |
SAKIZAYA CHAMPION
IMO 9680360
|
78,080 | 2014 |
3.4
|
A |
| 597 |
RB JAKE
IMO 9765706
|
81,039 | 2016 |
3.4
|
A |
| 596 |
SHANDONG FU REN
IMO 9748784
|
81,783 | 2018 |
3.4
|
A |
| 595 |
SHARQI
IMO 9964845
|
66,316 | 2023 |
3.4
|
A |
| 594 |
BESIKTAS KAZAKHSTAN
IMO 9461271
|
169,263 | 2010 |
3.4
|
A |
Which engines power the greenest fleets?
The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.
AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.