Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#883 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
9.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+2% higher
D

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
851 PVT CLARA
IMO 9442548
20,831 2009
9.3
C
852 BASILIS L
IMO 9290505
37,371 2005
9.3
C
853 MAGNIFICA
IMO 9374234
40,248 2009
9.3
C
854 HOPE A
IMO 9282821
40,095 2002
9.4
D
855 PACIFICO
IMO 9876830
22,554 2022
9.4
D
856 MTM SHANGHAI
IMO 9345908
19,885 2006
9.4
D
857 SOLAR SHARNA
IMO 9877614
25,039 2018
9.4
D
858 YC PANSY
IMO 9311256
20,645 2005
9.4
D
859 BLUE ROSE
IMO 9335915
38,402 2007
9.4
D
860 BIXBITE
IMO 9316610
39,999 2009
9.4
D
861 MARVEL
IMO 9364930
38,513 2008
9.4
D
862 FAIRCHEM PATHFINDER
IMO 9975301
26,300 2022
9.4
D
863 GINGA LION
IMO 9278727
26,196 2004
9.4
D
864 FAIRCHEM SWORD
IMO 9673678
19,993 2013
9.4
D
865 ASIA LIBERTY
IMO 9752694
34,200 2019
9.4
D
866 CHEMROUTE SKY
IMO 9508160
25,401 2010
9.4
D
867 MTM SINGAPORE
IMO 9477529
19,996 2011
9.4
D
868 ASP LILY
IMO 9542178
19,991 2011
9.4
D
869 VALDERICE
IMO 9587843
37,583 2011
9.4
D
870 CIELO DI CAPRI
IMO 9717278
39,043 2016
9.5
D
871 BOW GLORY
IMO 9758038
22,354 2017
9.5
D
872 BOW SUCCESS
IMO 9758090
22,346 2017
9.5
D
873 SILVER RAY
IMO 9493133
19,801 2013
9.5
D
874 CELSIUS MIDDELFART
IMO 9733349
19,997 2014
9.5
D
875 BHARAT
IMO 9253595
40,128 2003
9.5
D
876 MELDERSKIN
IMO 9737577
19,999 2016
9.5
D
877 MELATI 6
IMO 9172260
31,969 2000
9.5
D
878 YC DAISY
IMO 9304344
19,953 2005
9.5
D
879 BOW JAGUAR
IMO 9989209
25,877 2024
9.5
D
880 T VEGA
IMO 9323766
19,807 2006
9.5
D
881 SEA NIMBUS
IMO 9724544
39,999 2016
9.6
D
882 GOLDENGATE PARK
IMO 9493145
19,801 2013
9.6
D
883 RAMANDA
IMO 9739812
17,994 2018
9.6
D
884 OASIS
IMO 9512173
26,199 2011
9.6
D
885 SILVER GERTRUDE
IMO 9683348
49,746 2014
9.6
D
886 CHEM NEON
IMO 9815264
19,972 2018
9.6
D
887 CHEM GALLIUM
IMO 9740782
19,973 2017
9.6
D
888 SERENE MONACO
IMO 9309629
19,999 2005
9.6
D
889 FAIRCHEM KATANA
IMO 9749685
19,980 2016
9.6
D
890 NAVIG8 CONSTELLATION
IMO 9489118
45,281 2013
9.6
D
891 SUNRISE RAY
IMO 9829679
19,976 2018
9.6
D
892 MTM KOBE
IMO 9776456
21,183 2018
9.6
D
893 FAIRCHEM FYNBOS
IMO 9914292
19,982 2021
9.6
D
894 PRABHU NAND
IMO 9425980
19,997 2008
9.7
D
895 SEYCHELLES PATRIOT
IMO 9365635
45,680 2008
9.7
D
896 ACADIA PARK
IMO 9780548
19,996 2018
9.7
D
897 CHEMICAL CHALLENGER
IMO 9743758
16,111 2015
9.7
D
898 BLADE GALAXY
IMO 9692416
19,994 2014
9.7
D
899 ASTELLA
IMO 9904041
13,822 2022
9.7
D
900 RAMIRA
IMO 9890599
17,999 2021
9.7
D
Page 18 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.