Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,432 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
+61% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1401 ATAHUALPA
IMO 9451460
46,549 2010
7.8
E
1402 BALTIC NARVAL
IMO 9930222
24,323 2023
7.8
E
1403 HAFNIA SUNDA
IMO 9725639
39,067 2015
7.8
E
1404 JAN
IMO 9259915
35,647 2003
7.8
E
1405 ATLANTIC NARVAL
IMO 9930210
24,316 2023
7.8
E
1406 ETERNAL
IMO 9273351
45,915 2004
7.8
E
1407 HISTRIA PERLA
IMO 9301287
39,999 2005
7.8
E
1408 HULDA MAERSK
IMO 9399363
37,959 2010
7.8
E
1409 MAERSK AEGEAN
IMO 9636644
37,538 2013
7.9
E
1410 CHAMPION TIMUR
IMO 9288837
47,210 2005
7.9
E
1411 ASPHALT SYNERGY
IMO 9794159
36,771 2018
7.9
E
1412 STI HACKNEY
IMO 9686883
38,734 2014
7.9
E
1413 STAR RIVER
IMO 9815458
36,819 2018
7.9
E
1414 ETC NEFERTARI
IMO 9399612
49,764 2011
7.9
E
1415 HISTRIA AMBRA
IMO 9607631
40,030 2013
8.0
E
1416 SINDRE KNUTSEN
IMO 9905928
123,602 2022
8.0
E
1417 SEAVALOUR
IMO 9315771
46,702 2007
8.0
E
1418 MAERSK KAYA
IMO 9431288
39,738 2011
8.1
E
1419 BISE
IMO 1021702
18,644 2025
8.1
E
1420 MINERVA JOANNA
IMO 9380386
46,924 2008
8.2
E
1421 HISTRIA CROWN
IMO 9607629
40,390 2012
8.2
E
1422 STI BATTERSEA
IMO 9691723
38,734 2014
8.2
E
1423 STI FULHAM
IMO 9688374
38,734 2014
8.2
E
1424 OM BORNEO
IMO 9341445
29,013 2007
8.2
E
1425 FURE VIKEN
IMO 9980318
17,945 2024
8.3
E
1426 TATIANA
IMO 9340128
38,396 2007
8.3
E
1427 AGIOS CHARALAMBOS
IMO 9379337
50,922 2007
8.3
E
1428 HENRIETTE MAERSK
IMO 9399349
37,985 2006
8.3
E
1429 BOW AGATHE
IMO 9393010
33,608 2009
8.3
E
1430 CLEAN RAIDER
IMO 9425318
49,999 2010
8.3
E
1431 PS SYDNEY
IMO 9829459
39,999 2019
8.3
E
1432 BOW ENDEAVOR
IMO 9490325
26,197 2011
8.3
E
1433 MELORIA
IMO 9292280
40,157 2006
8.4
E
1434 KRITI
IMO 9270737
47,999 2004
8.4
E
1435 HENRY MAERSK
IMO 9399351
37,933 2006
8.4
E
1436 TIGANI
IMO 9776767
112,763 2017
8.4
E
1437 THUN VETTERN
IMO 9971214
17,945 2024
8.4
E
1438 HANS MAERSK
IMO 9389497
37,961 2009
8.4
E
1439 VISION
IMO 9295347
37,343 2006
8.4
E
1440 FURE VESBORG
IMO 9980332
17,948 2025
8.4
E
1441 PIS POLARIS
IMO 9426295
45,988 2006
8.5
E
1442 STI FINCHLEY
IMO 9696565
38,734 2014
8.5
E
1443 ICE FIGHTER
IMO 9333656
70,374 2003
8.5
E
1444 HILDA KNUTSEN
IMO 9628300
123,166 2013
8.5
E
1445 MARIANNA V.V.
IMO 9259707
84,999 2001
8.6
E
1446 MOUNT MCKINNEY
IMO 9263174
40,007 2001
8.6
E
1447 WINDSOR KNUTSEN
IMO 9316115
160,241 2007
8.6
E
1448 KRITI ROCK
IMO 9392315
45,920 2008
8.7
E
1449 STI ROTHERHITHE
IMO 9706475
38,734 2015
8.7
E
1450 CUMBIA1
IMO 9436343
50,213 2010
8.7
E
Page 29 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.