Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,068 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
19.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
+43% higher
E

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2051 MUSTAFA YAGCI
IMO 9314545
5,874 2006
19.6
E
2052 NORMAN
IMO 9361342
4,536 2007
19.6
E
2053 VULIN
IMO 9015448
2,646 1993
19.6
E
2054 ADRIATA
IMO 9005376
5,697 1992
19.6
E
2055 VERTOM ISA
IMO 9507362
3,586 2010
19.7
E
2056 ASG PORTOFINO
IMO 9229087
7,796 2002
19.7
E
2057 WERRATAL
IMO 9192636
4,443 2001
19.7
E
2058 NIKLAS
IMO 9582855
3,756 2010
19.7
E
2059 RONJA
IMO 9434046
4,500 2008
19.7
E
2060 WILSON DRAMMEN
IMO 9390094
3,671 2007
19.8
E
2061 INDUSTRIAL CONFIDENCE
IMO 9810331
8,406 2018
19.8
E
2062 ENNY
IMO 7926409
4,632 1980
19.8
E
2063 FLUVIUS PLYM
IMO 9163611
3,211 1998
19.8
E
2064 MULTIMARE
IMO 9143788
4,148 1997
19.8
E
2065 WILSON CORK
IMO 9178460
4,445 1998
19.8
E
2066 KAREN
IMO 9487603
4,888 2008
19.9
E
2067 CAPELLA
IMO 9190171
3,792 1999
19.9
E
2068 WILSON DVINA
IMO 9005742
3,269 1992
19.9
E
2069 WILSON CALAIS
IMO 9156101
4,450 2001
19.9
E
2070 WILSON HIRTSHALS
IMO 9240251
4,247 2001
19.9
E
2071 LADY KHADIJA
IMO 8918734
7,177 1997
19.9
E
2072 OCEANIC
IMO 9624550
3,000 2012
19.9
E
2073 ANNA LEHMANN
IMO 9225562
4,111 2000
19.9
E
2074 CLARA K.
IMO 9373321
4,285 2007
19.9
E
2075 WILSON DAVANGER
IMO 9390111
3,783 2008
19.9
E
2076 HUMBER SPRINTER
IMO 9467172
4,114 2009
19.9
E
2077 WILSON GRIMSBY
IMO 9056040
3,689 1993
19.9
E
2078 HUMBER RUNNER
IMO 9467184
4,114 2010
19.9
E
2079 LISTER
IMO 9155963
4,113 1997
20.0
E
2080 WILMA
IMO 9462744
3,794 2009
20.0
E
2081 THESEUS
IMO 9199256
2,500 2000
20.0
E
2082 WILSON ONEGA
IMO 9156199
2,516 1997
20.0
E
2083 WILSON DUSAVIK
IMO 9390147
3,665 2009
20.0
E
2084 NORDIC
IMO 9663001
3,000 2013
20.0
E
2085 FRANCISCA
IMO 9148166
3,250 1997
20.0
E
2086 CELLUS
IMO 9173317
6,252 1998
20.0
E
2087 KARIN LEHMANN
IMO 9225574
4,071 2000
20.1
E
2088 FORTIUS
IMO 8420701
1,753 1985
20.1
E
2089 FRI SKIEN
IMO 9148192
3,740 2000
20.1
E
2090 VALENTINA
IMO 9195872
5,050 2000
20.1
E
2091 RIX WARRIOR
IMO 9129134
4,123 1996
20.1
E
2092 NESTOR
IMO 9234305
2,500 2000
20.1
E
2093 FREBERG
IMO 9030230
2,521 1992
20.1
E
2094 BBC ECHO
IMO 9407603
10,308 2010
20.1
E
2095 AST ECO
IMO 9414656
3,323 2007
20.1
E
2096 HAVELLAND
IMO 9499735
6,052 2012
20.1
E
2097 WILSON DIEPPE
IMO 9409625
3,782 2010
20.2
E
2098 WILSON JUPITER
IMO 9411795
3,629 2021
20.2
E
2099 BARON
IMO 9394210
5,229 2006
20.2
E
2100 WILSON DUBLIN
IMO 9390109
3,778 2008
20.2
E
Page 42 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.