Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#3,278 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
7.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
+62% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3251 ALYCIA
IMO 9588366
35,058 2012
7.5
E
3252 BC LIBERTY
IMO 1021295
40,354 2025
7.5
E
3253 TAO ACE
IMO 9639696
25,037 2013
7.5
E
3254 HOPE
IMO 9545053
34,146 2011
7.5
E
3255 ADELINA
IMO 9595785
35,072 2012
7.5
E
3256 JAOHAR UK
IMO 9302463
27,112 2003
7.5
E
3257 SABEEL STAR
IMO 9257058
27,101 2003
7.5
E
3258 REK ELITE
IMO 9498626
37,369 2012
7.5
E
3259 AFRICAN HHB
IMO 9666429
28,358 2015
7.5
E
3260 MJ MASSA
IMO 9224867
29,944 2002
7.5
E
3261 CHINA SPIRIT
IMO 9655846
35,097 2013
7.5
E
3262 WL PACIFIC
IMO 9497878
33,413 2011
7.6
E
3263 PARANA WARRIOR
IMO 9412945
28,415 2007
7.6
E
3264 DENSA PELICAN
IMO 9603300
82,744 2012
7.6
E
3265 PHILLIP BAY
IMO 9714757
40,030 2015
7.6
E
3266 JOHANNA G
IMO 9285940
37,228 2004
7.6
E
3267 ADVENTURE
IMO 9496329
36,895 2011
7.6
E
3268 ANTHEIA
IMO 9473078
21,163 2010
7.6
E
3269 LU YANG SHUN
IMO 9634880
29,061 2012
7.6
E
3270 MERCURY
IMO 9084231
21,955 1994
7.6
E
3271 LADY LAVELA
IMO 9675561
28,316 2015
7.6
E
3272 LILLY BOLTEN
IMO 9406063
30,765 2009
7.6
E
3273 LAGAVULIN
IMO 9396555
16,115 2007
7.6
E
3274 BOBIK
IMO 9317781
31,896 2006
7.6
E
3275 LADY MARGARET
IMO 9499424
31,864 2013
7.6
E
3276 MAJESTIC VERA
IMO 9474230
34,999 2011
7.6
E
3277 TAO BRAVE
IMO 9487586
25,065 2011
7.6
E
3278 RAHMA
IMO 9588380
35,829 2011
7.6
E
3279 XIN HAI TONG 30
IMO 9611010
56,583 2013
7.6
E
3280 SC DALLAS
IMO 9587180
32,318 2011
7.6
E
3281 QING FENG LING
IMO 9663702
34,472 2013
7.7
E
3282 BULKNES
IMO 9384370
33,171 2009
7.7
E
3283 BAM DESPINA
IMO 9517549
32,411 2009
7.7
E
3284 SPLITTNES
IMO 9101730
18,886 1994
7.7
E
3285 C-INSPIRATION
IMO 9604782
28,258 2011
7.7
E
3286 YALOUSSA
IMO 9464546
28,361 2008
7.7
E
3287 IC PROGRESS
IMO 9611577
32,527 2011
7.7
E
3288 LIVADI
IMO 9522946
35,058 2011
7.7
E
3289 LADY MARY
IMO 9604744
28,238 2012
7.7
E
3290 PAIWAN WISDOM
IMO 9427122
31,967 2010
7.7
E
3291 NJ CALLISTO
IMO 9497452
31,796 2012
7.7
E
3292 AGIOS NIKOLAOS
IMO 9502776
35,217 2010
7.7
E
3293 SKIPPER PLANET
IMO 9060730
22,176 1993
7.7
E
3294 PEBBLE BEACH
IMO 9595979
37,003 2013
7.8
E
3295 LADY LILLY
IMO 9642021
28,397 2013
7.8
E
3296 HANNAH
IMO 9464558
28,354 2008
7.8
E
3297 JULIETTE
IMO 9459113
34,398 2012
7.8
E
3298 HUA YANG MEI GUI
IMO 9497490
30,035 2011
7.8
E
3299 NAVA DIONYSSOS
IMO 9608673
34,067 2010
7.8
E
3300 PEACE M
IMO 9086318
26,467 1996
7.8
E
Page 66 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.