Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#734 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-28% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 556C 557D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 279 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
57
'27 Q2
37
'27 Q3
45
'27 Q4
71
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
34
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,874 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,757 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,371 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,195 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

411
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,668–3,970M
capex range, top measure per vessel (411 of 411 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.49 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
704 EAGLE BINTULU
IMO 9795074
113,400 2019
3.6
B
706 SEASPRITE
IMO 9711468
113,998 2015
3.6
B
702 PROTEUS SINEAD
IMO 9923413
109,999 2022
3.6
B
701 YPAPANTI
IMO 9693082
109,999 2016
3.6
B
705 GLORIA MARIS
IMO 9899997
156,620 2021
3.6
B
703 HYDRA
IMO 9294551
105,744 2004
3.6
B
708 STI ALEXIS
IMO 9696694
109,999 2015
3.6
B
710 EAGLE KUANTAN
IMO 9417012
107,481 2010
3.6
B
707 NORDIC VEGA
IMO 9412581
164,028 2010
3.6
B
712 FLAVIN
IMO 9787912
115,125 2018
3.6
B
711 SAFEEN ELIZABETH
IMO 9524449
158,573 2011
3.6
B
709 FEZZAN
IMO 9888730
114,243 2021
3.6
B
714 STI SANCTITY
IMO 9719707
109,999 2016
3.6
B
713 STI LOBELIA
IMO 9838228
109,994 2019
3.6
B
717 BALLA
IMO 9749556
113,293 2017
3.6
B
719 PROTEUS HARVONNE
IMO 9923401
109,999 2022
3.6
B
716 NISSOS CHRISTIANA
IMO 9694658
114,264 2015
3.6
B
721 DELTA SPIRIT
IMO 9419096
161,724 2010
3.6
B
720 SARASOTA A
IMO 9383869
106,849 2008
3.6
B
715 PACIFIC ANNA
IMO 9772010
109,999 2017
3.6
B
718 MELTEMI I
IMO 9298741
163,759 2006
3.6
B
722 ARETEA
IMO 9711456
113,969 2015
3.6
C
723 PATROCLUS
IMO 9413834
158,267 2009
3.6
C
726 BREEZE III
IMO 9292515
115,525 2005
3.6
C
725 HAFNIA SHANGHAI
IMO 9830290
74,999 2019
3.6
C
724 PACIFIC NAFSIKA
IMO 9732278
109,999 2016
3.6
C
727 JAG LAKSHYA
IMO 9516117
157,641 2011
3.6
C
729 TORM INNOVATION
IMO 9602722
73,847 2013
3.6
C
728 DREPANOS
IMO 9420643
107,467 2012
3.6
C
730 MINERVA VERA
IMO 9411941
158,022 2009
3.7
C
731 ON PHOENIX
IMO 9893228
114,623 2021
3.7
C
733 MINERVA ZENOBIA
IMO 9787182
114,671 2018
3.7
C
732 MARLIN HESTIA
IMO 9729233
74,260 2017
3.7
C
734 TORM GABRIELLA
IMO 9428994
119,456 2010
3.7
C
738 SELETAR SPIRIT
IMO 9484077
108,993 2010
3.7
C
737 DELTA IOS
IMO 9406685
157,484 2009
3.7
C
736 ATLANTIC EMERALD
IMO 9892975
109,201 2022
3.7
C
735 SEA PANTHER
IMO 9802164
114,723 2018
3.7
C
740 HOVDEN SPIRIT
IMO 9596997
105,276 2012
3.7
C
741 LIPARI
IMO 9529487
158,237 2012
3.7
C
739 FRONT ANTARES
IMO 9745926
111,059 2017
3.7
C
743 HAFNIA LARVIK
IMO 9946465
109,999 2023
3.7
C
742 ANWAAR BENGHAZI
IMO 9888742
114,077 2021
3.7
C
746 STI RAMBLA
IMO 9730880
109,999 2017
3.7
C
745 BOCCADASSE
IMO 9829899
109,991 2018
3.7
C
744 TIGANI
IMO 9776767
112,763 2017
3.7
C
749 HUMBLE WARRIOR
IMO 9856361
149,990 2020
3.7
C
748 SEARUBY
IMO 9759795
114,073 2017
3.7
C
747 GEMINI SUN
IMO 9343340
115,577 2008
3.7
C
750 TORM GLORIA
IMO 9461843
119,456 2011
3.7
C
Page 15 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.