Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,401 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
20.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+119% higher
E

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1401 CATHY THERESA
IMO 9478315
7,846 2011
20.6
E
1402 ESSEX STAR
IMO 9348297
16,744 2007
20.6
E
1403 MED TUNCER
IMO 9830599
8,227 2019
20.7
E
1404 GENNARO IEVOLI
IMO 9268631
12,004 2004
20.7
E
1405 GTM GERMANY
IMO 9405320
11,796 2008
20.8
E
1406 HYDRA
IMO 9837341
7,870 2019
20.9
E
1407 MRC MINA
IMO 9464285
7,718 2009
21.0
E
1408 NORMA
IMO 9870666
7,399 2020
21.0
E
1409 MED BALTIC
IMO 9462304
8,269 2011
21.0
E
1410 BLUE BIRD
IMO 9527764
9,938 2011
21.0
E
1411 ROLAND ESSBERGER
IMO 9504217
9,124 2013
21.0
E
1412 DANTE A
IMO 9361029
12,100 2008
21.2
E
1413 SONGA ATLANTIC
IMO 9447328
17,999 2010
21.3
E
1414 LADY ELA
IMO 9511442
7,667 2009
21.4
E
1415 BOTHNIA
IMO 9485356
8,985 2013
21.7
E
1416 SWAN BISCAY
IMO 9466532
6,711 2021
21.7
E
1417 MARY A
IMO 9321433
8,036 2007
21.7
E
1418 CORAL ESSBERGER
IMO 9504205
9,118 2012
21.8
E
1419 MED BLUE JAY
IMO 9544346
8,231 2021
21.8
E
1420 MED ARCTIC
IMO 9410545
8,239 2009
21.8
E
1421 MAYOURY
IMO 9777541
9,194 2017
22.0
E
1422 MIMMO IEVOLI
IMO 9147746
9,554 1998
22.1
E
Page 29 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.