Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#3,046 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
6.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+38% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3001 ORIENT PROGRESS
IMO 9450777
34,393 2011
6.6
E
3002 ORIENT PACE
IMO 9450753
34,390 2007
6.6
E
3003 ISABELLE G
IMO 9285938
37,193 2004
6.6
E
3004 LAGO DI LEDRO
IMO 9471654
37,390 2012
6.6
E
3005 BC GRACE
IMO 9561887
29,637 2011
6.6
E
3006 MJ PINAR
IMO 9406051
30,487 2009
6.6
E
3007 TOMKAR
IMO 9180372
34,948 1999
6.6
E
3008 ASTRO ORION
IMO 9767326
37,347 2017
6.6
E
3009 ADELINA
IMO 9595785
35,072 2012
6.6
E
3010 C TIGER
IMO 9583706
35,693 2011
6.6
E
3011 PURE MERCY
IMO 9277474
32,759 2005
6.6
E
3012 ALIKI FORCE
IMO 9498559
58,419 2011
6.7
E
3013 ELISAR
IMO 9595747
36,817 2011
6.7
E
3014 OSMAN BEY
IMO 9111357
27,321 1995
6.7
E
3015 KEN BREEZE
IMO 9636383
37,148 2012
6.7
E
3016 LILA
IMO 9278923
28,678 2003
6.7
E
3017 LADY LITEL
IMO 9571428
33,789 2013
6.7
E
3018 AGROPROSPERIS 1
IMO 9516703
35,757 2010
6.7
E
3019 BLISS
IMO 9370331
35,278 2007
6.7
E
3020 MARINA L
IMO 9675705
28,384 2014
6.7
E
3021 LOWLANDS SHARK
IMO 9674787
36,309 2015
6.7
E
3022 POLESIE
IMO 9488097
38,056 2009
6.7
E
3023 STRANDJA
IMO 9564140
30,683 2010
6.7
E
3024 FEDERAL KIBUNE
IMO 9606053
36,824 2010
6.7
E
3025 ES CARE
IMO 9708930
35,510 2015
6.7
E
3026 NANA LEEN
IMO 9113850
28,300 1995
6.7
E
3027 PREDATOR
IMO 9641792
28,348 2013
6.7
E
3028 AVELLANEDA
IMO 9571636
34,938 2013
6.7
E
3029 BUNUN WISDOM
IMO 9628568
38,168 2012
6.7
E
3030 SOFIA R
IMO 9530967
36,093 2012
6.7
E
3031 MAPLE AMBITION
IMO 9760354
35,513 2015
6.7
E
3032 GLADIATOR
IMO 9445033
28,341 2008
6.7
E
3033 TSL ROSEMARY
IMO 9527192
33,191 2012
6.7
E
3034 ARGO B
IMO 9459371
35,314 2010
6.7
E
3035 KOSZALIN
IMO 9594236
37,930 2012
6.7
E
3036 JALMA TOPIC
IMO 9309655
51,966 2006
6.7
E
3037 FEDERAL NAKAGAWA
IMO 9278791
36,489 2005
6.7
E
3038 GAT FATHER
IMO 9764013
35,737 2016
6.7
E
3039 YANNIS GORGIAS
IMO 9423293
87,375 2010
6.7
E
3040 LOWLANDS CORSO
IMO 9959450
40,039 2023
6.7
E
3041 EVRIALI
IMO 9405435
53,554 2007
6.7
E
3042 CLEANTEC
IMO 9473418
33,344 2009
6.7
E
3043 HELENA G
IMO 9358383
37,251 2007
6.7
E
3044 FEDERICA
IMO 9612313
36,781 2012
6.7
E
3045 YALOUSSA
IMO 9464546
28,361 2008
6.7
E
3046 MATIN BEY
IMO 9082623
26,477 1996
6.7
E
3047 GLOBAL WINNER
IMO 9579391
38,190 2011
6.7
E
3048 ARIETTA
IMO 9545065
35,083 2012
6.7
E
3049 WHISTLER
IMO 9358371
37,272 2007
6.7
E
3050 TANAIS DREAM
IMO 9283899
28,611 2003
6.7
E
Page 61 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.