Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,896 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
18.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
+32% higher
D

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1851 SILVA
IMO 9237010
5,464 2001
18.0
D
1852 SIEGFRIED LEHMANN
IMO 9325142
4,508 2005
18.0
D
1853 WILSON GIJON
IMO 9056038
3,689 1993
18.0
D
1854 MANISA GRETA
IMO 9391024
8,419 2007
18.0
D
1855 WILSON HOLLA
IMO 9229130
4,338 2002
18.0
D
1856 AMADEUS AQUAMARIJN
IMO 9223423
2,640 2000
18.1
D
1857 ERNST HAGEDORN
IMO 9137301
2,590 1996
18.1
D
1858 WILSON SAIMAA
IMO 9313694
2,634 2005
18.1
D
1859 MAINTAL
IMO 9280677
3,806 2006
18.1
D
1860 BLUE TUNE
IMO 9491927
5,262 2008
18.1
D
1861 WILSON GAETA
IMO 9171096
3,894 1998
18.1
D
1862 MERITA
IMO 8422034
5,018 1985
18.1
D
1863 ALESSANDRA LEHMANN
IMO 9290684
4,508 2004
18.1
D
1864 GULIZAR ANA
IMO 9335355
3,300 2005
18.1
D
1865 TANGO RIO
IMO 9205718
9,231 2000
18.1
D
1866 TAGUS RIVER
IMO 9368596
6,354 2007
18.1
D
1867 BBC EAGLE
IMO 9407574
10,340 2008
18.1
D
1868 SEA SPRINTER
IMO 9364019
6,355 2007
18.1
D
1869 ARKLOW VENTURE
IMO 9772589
5,165 2017
18.2
D
1870 LADY MARY
IMO 9375836
3,612 2008
18.2
D
1871 HAGLAND CHIEF
IMO 9521344
4,450 2012
18.2
D
1872 NORDICA HAV
IMO 8324684
2,316 1983
18.2
D
1873 CELINE
IMO 9508653
5,463 2011
18.2
D
1874 SEA LEADER
IMO 9363998
6,355 2007
18.2
D
1875 RIX GULF
IMO 9396701
5,236 2008
18.2
D
1876 BREB COURAGEOUS
IMO 9421178
7,801 2009
18.2
D
1877 PALEISGRACHT
IMO 9448346
19,496 2011
18.3
D
1878 KARMEL
IMO 9290672
4,516 2004
18.3
D
1879 HALLAND
IMO 9436238
6,805 2008
18.3
D
1880 VASTERBOTTEN
IMO 9436226
6,805 2008
18.3
D
1881 SUN BIRD
IMO 9415636
4,410 2009
18.3
D
1882 VON ADLER
IMO 9184433
4,023 2001
18.3
D
1883 UNIWIND
IMO 8024155
4,500 1981
18.3
D
1884 HAPPY ROVER
IMO 9139309
15,443 1997
18.3
D
1885 WILSON LOVIISA
IMO 9213600
2,620 2005
18.3
D
1886 WIDOR
IMO 9528483
3,450 2009
18.3
D
1887 CINDY
IMO 9004499
9,597 1992
18.3
D
1888 CALAMAR
IMO 9528512
4,030 2011
18.3
D
1889 C.POLARIS
IMO 9356866
3,720 2007
18.4
D
1890 KAMELIA
IMO 9188958
5,049 1999
18.4
D
1891 PRIMA KING
IMO 9195822
4,748 2000
18.4
D
1892 VERMLAND
IMO 9757084
4,879 2016
18.4
D
1893 PRIMA VIKING
IMO 9195810
4,748 1999
18.4
D
1894 SHANNON RIVER
IMO 9368572
6,354 2006
18.4
D
1895 LUCA
IMO 9570632
7,909 2011
18.4
D
1896 SPANACO FIDELITY
IMO 9472024
4,193 2009
18.4
D
1897 FEED TRONDHEIM
IMO 9226798
5,121 2002
18.4
D
1898 RIX MARINER
IMO 9197387
3,676 2001
18.4
D
1899 LINDE
IMO 9141352
4,618 1998
18.4
D
1900 INDUSTRIAL COURAGE
IMO 9810329
8,442 2018
18.4
D
Page 38 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.