Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#105 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
2.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-47% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 630 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

121
Q4
138
'27 Q1
84
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
137
'27 Q4
132
'28 Q1
97
'28 Q2
111
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,728 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,124
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,918–11,738M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,124 of 1,124 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
104 HEIDE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9871103
208,000 2015
2.5
A
102 CAPE PEONY
IMO 9425447
181,325 2012
2.5
A
101 NAVIOS SAKURA
IMO 9951927
182,169 2023
2.5
A
103 MINERAL SUBIC
IMO 9456678
179,396 2011
2.5
A
108 BULK SPAIN
IMO 9469015
176,328 2011
2.5
A
107 BERGE MAWSON
IMO 9738868
181,160 2015
2.5
A
106 CEMTEX SINCERITY
IMO 9820661
82,200 2014
2.5
A
105 ANNABEL L
IMO 9853711
180,803 2019
2.5
A
109 ATLANTIC DRAGON
IMO 9874600
209,170 2020
2.5
A
110 GREAT BLOSSOM
IMO 9986910
82,781 2024
2.5
A
111 MARAN BRILLIANCE
IMO 9721035
179,129 2013
2.5
A
112 KANARIS
IMO 9469857
178,064 2006
2.5
A
113 MIN MAY
IMO 9751004
180,004 2014
2.5
A
114 ASL OTSL 2
IMO 9500766
180,643 2012
2.5
A
117 CIC PAOLA
IMO 9692820
181,059 2014
2.5
A
116 CAPE HARMONY
IMO 9514212
178,373 2012
2.5
A
115 BACON
IMO 9639517
205,170 2013
2.5
A
119 FPMC B IMAGE
IMO 9423334
206,699 2012
2.5
A
118 SEMA M
IMO 9304150
106,552 2007
2.5
A
122 FLAGSHIP
IMO 9514224
176,387 2013
2.6
A
124 GINA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9942732
182,002 2023
2.6
A
121 MARVELLOUS
IMO 9579872
180,000 2010
2.6
A
120 SCARLET CYPRESS
IMO 1016109
82,010 2024
2.6
A
123 CAPE BRITANNIA
IMO 9409065
178,369 2009
2.6
A
127 MARAN FUTURE
IMO 9739240
179,318 2015
2.6
A
126 KERYNIA
IMO 9961439
82,114 2024
2.6
A
125 MARAN CONQUEROR
IMO 9581241
179,718 2010
2.6
A
128 TAMPA
IMO 9363027
177,723 2007
2.6
A
129 NAVIOS ANTARES
IMO 9481257
169,059 2006
2.6
A
130 STAR MARTHA
IMO 9564097
180,274 2010
2.6
A
132 MAGDALENA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9638044
206,010 2011
2.6
A
131 STAR VESTA
IMO 9446506
180,136 2010
2.6
A
133 WILLIAM OLDENDORFF
IMO 9623570
180,000 2010
2.6
A
135 CHRISTINA V
IMO 9658915
77,211 2014
2.6
A
134 LADY WYNN
IMO 9861794
182,514 2020
2.6
A
137 TAHO EUDAIMONIA
IMO 9919319
84,460 2019
2.6
A
136 SAKIZAYA XCEL
IMO 9934917
82,446 2022
2.6
A
142 PELOREUS
IMO 9702534
182,476 2014
2.6
A
141 CAPE LILY
IMO 9612430
181,303 2012
2.6
A
140 ALPHA OPTIMISM
IMO 9722388
179,258 2016
2.6
A
139 GOLDEN ZHEJIANG
IMO 9443619
175,837 2006
2.6
A
138 SSI BRILLIANT
IMO 9567099
175,428 2012
2.6
A
143 CAPETAN IOANNIS
IMO 9589695
180,652 2011
2.6
A
144 HERO
IMO 9446867
178,076 2010
2.6
A
147 BBG LIJIANG
IMO 9971953
82,788 2024
2.6
A
146 YUAN HANG WEI YE
IMO 9371799
50,785 2006
2.6
A
145 SAKIZAYA TREASURE
IMO 9861328
82,500 2020
2.6
A
150 AM PORT CARTIER
IMO 9546801
180,715 2013
2.6
A
149 NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9743265
180,960 2015
2.6
A
148 WANG MAY
IMO 9837327
180,682 2019
2.6
A
Page 3 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.