Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#360 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
5.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-49% greener
A
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
353 EVER ALP
IMO 9893929
23,992 TEU 2021
5.3
A
352 APL SINGAPURA
IMO 9632002
13,892 TEU 2013
5.3
A
351 MSC CAMILLE
IMO 9404651
13,300 TEU 2009
5.3
A
354 APL TEMASEK
IMO 9631955
13,892 TEU 2013
5.3
A
355 MSC VENICE
IMO 9647473
16,552 TEU 2016
5.3
A
357 MSC JOSSELINE
IMO 9842061
15,000 TEU 2019
5.3
A
356 MSC VIRGO
IMO 9857171
15,000 TEU 2020
5.3
A
358 CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER
IMO 9702144
17,722 TEU 2015
5.3
A
359 MSC RAVENNA
IMO 9484431
14,000 TEU 2011
5.3
A
360 MSC KATRINA
IMO 9467445
12,400 TEU 2012
5.3
A
361 ANGELICA MAERSK
IMO 9948798
16,592 TEU 2021
5.3
A
364 MSC GRETA III
IMO 9415296
2,732 TEU 2008
5.3
A
363 SEASPAN GANGES
IMO 9630365
10,100 TEU 2014
5.3
A
362 MSC MIRJA
IMO 9762338
15,909 TEU 2016
5.3
A
365 CMA CGM KERGUELEN
IMO 9702132
17,722 TEU 2015
5.4
A
366 EA CENTAURUS
IMO 9967469
7,092 TEU 2023
5.4
A
368 EVER GLORY
IMO 9786839
20,000 TEU 2019
5.4
A
367 ONE MANCHESTER
IMO 9706748
13,870 TEU 2015
5.4
A
369 MAERSK COPENHAGEN
IMO 9525405
4,500 TEU 2012
5.4
A
371 CMA CGM MAUI
IMO 9938157
15,000 TEU 2024
5.4
A
370 MAERSK HOUSTON
IMO 9848950
15,286 TEU 2019
5.4
A
372 MSC KATIE
IMO 9467457
12,400 TEU 2012
5.4
A
373 HOUSTON EXPRESS
IMO 9667150
13,800 TEU 2014
5.4
A
374 MAERSK HAMBURG
IMO 9784312
15,282 TEU 2018
5.4
A
375 MSC INGY
IMO 9755945
17,590 TEU 2016
5.4
A
377 CMA CGM ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT
IMO 9454448
16,020 TEU 2013
5.4
A
376 EVER GENTLE
IMO 9820922
20,150 TEU 2019
5.4
A
380 CMA CGM CEDRUS
IMO 9938121
15,000 TEU 2024
5.5
A
379 MSC ALINA
IMO 9695016
9,000 TEU 2014
5.5
A
378 CMA CGM ADONIS
IMO 9882528
15,000 TEU 2022
5.5
A
381 APL CHANGI
IMO 9631981
13,892 TEU 2013
5.5
A
383 EVER ALOT
IMO 9893955
23,888 TEU 2022
5.5
A
382 THESEUS
IMO 9728954
13,455 TEU 2016
5.5
A
385 APL VANDA
IMO 9631993
17,292 TEU 2013
5.5
A
384 EVER GOVERN
IMO 9832717
20,150 TEU 2019
5.5
A
386 EVER GIVEN
IMO 9811000
20,000 TEU 2015
5.5
A
387 APL MERLION
IMO 9632014
13,892 TEU 2014
5.5
A
388 MSC TARANTO
IMO 9475258
14,000 TEU 2011
5.5
A
389 APL DETROIT
IMO 9632208
9,200 TEU 2014
5.5
A
390 CMA CGM KIMBERLEY
IMO 9894973
15,000 TEU 2021
5.5
A
391 MSC EVA
IMO 9401130
10,000 TEU 2010
5.5
A
392 EXPRESS FRANCE
IMO 9443035
3,459 TEU 2010
5.5
A
393 CSCL ARCTIC OCEAN
IMO 9695169
19,000 TEU 2015
5.5
A
395 CMA CGM RIVOLI
IMO 9839193
22,448 TEU 2021
5.6
A
394 ONE RESOLUTION
IMO 9952763
7,000 TEU 2024
5.6
A
397 MSC ROSA M
IMO 9461398
14,000 TEU 2010
5.6
A
396 MSC BIANCA
IMO 9770749
11,500 TEU 2019
5.6
A
399 MSC MAPUTO
IMO 9967263
8,002 TEU 2024
5.6
A
398 EVER MEED
IMO 9935258
15,000 TEU 2024
5.6
A
400 MSC LAURENCE
IMO 9467419
12,400 TEU 2011
5.6
A
Page 8 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.