Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#861 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
12.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-11% greener
B

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
851 SUOMIGRACHT
IMO 9288057
23,660 2004
12.3
B
852 DA ZHI
IMO 9608439
29,496 2014
12.3
B
853 MERCURIUS
IMO 9622394
5,893 2012
12.4
B
854 TQ MERSIN
IMO 1052270
12,060 2008
12.4
B
856 ANDESBORG
IMO 9466324
17,294 2011
12.4
B
855 ARKLOW ARROW
IMO 9851971
8,543 2021
12.4
B
858 ADALADY
IMO 9664160
13,559 2013
12.4
B
857 LADY LEYLA
IMO 9106986
11,366 1995
12.4
B
859 ECO TITAN
IMO 9933793
9,000 2023
12.4
B
860 AMURBORG
IMO 9466336
17,294 2011
12.4
B
861 FWN SUN
IMO 9721669
10,546 2016
12.4
B
862 TRANSOSPREY
IMO 9213090
20,396 2003
12.4
B
866 SAMPOGRACHT
IMO 9288071
23,741 2005
12.4
B
865 BBA LARISA
IMO 9166510
5,005 1999
12.4
B
864 CELIK 1
IMO 9430791
7,702 2007
12.4
B
863 ANOUK
IMO 9196266
3,171 2000
12.4
B
867 TQ ISTANBUL
IMO 9006332
3,713 1993
12.4
B
868 VECTIS PROGRESS
IMO 9626144
11,051 2012
12.4
B
869 CONDOR MAGALLANES
IMO 9539365
19,024 2011
12.4
B
870 EKMEN STAR
IMO 9218193
7,580 2001
12.4
B
871 PAN BOREAS
IMO 9488645
8,090 2008
12.5
B
872 CONDOR BILBAO
IMO 9473250
17,287 2012
12.5
B
874 LAGA
IMO 9006318
3,710 1993
12.5
B
873 BBC PERU
IMO 9549592
13,537 2012
12.5
B
875 NOSSAN
IMO 9988516
5,080 2025
12.5
B
876 ECO TROPHY
IMO 9938688
9,120 2024
12.5
B
877 ELKE K.
IMO 9879040
5,180 2020
12.5
B
879 NORMA
IMO 9306419
8,100 2006
12.5
B
878 GOTLAND
IMO 9480136
17,409 2011
12.5
B
880 KELLY
IMO 9255622
9,857 2004
12.5
B
882 AMSTELBORG
IMO 9333527
17,356 2006
12.6
B
881 CSL FLEXVIK
IMO 9521825
18,003 2012
12.6
B
883 VESTANHAV
IMO 9504152
9,927 2012
12.6
B
884 RONNIE
IMO 9736224
12,325 2021
12.6
B
885 CHARLIE
IMO 9736236
12,234 2022
12.6
B
886 ECO TRIUMPH
IMO 9938717
9,000 2025
12.6
B
887 INDUSTRIAL MOMENTUM
IMO 9534432
10,049 2010
12.6
B
888 JANINE
IMO 9014664
3,700 1991
12.6
B
889 ANKA BLUE
IMO 9317808
8,181 2005
12.6
B
892 NORTHSTAR GLORY
IMO 9033854
3,857 1992
12.6
B
891 GEMINI MAESTRO
IMO 9350006
7,448 2007
12.6
B
890 ARKLOW MANOR
IMO 9440241
14,998 2009
12.6
B
893 NISA SOFUOGLU
IMO 9554121
6,566 2010
12.6
B
898 RIX FLEVO
IMO 9139335
4,466 1996
12.6
B
897 EKMEN ROYAL
IMO 9165865
10,334 2005
12.6
B
896 ARKLOW MARSH
IMO 9440253
14,998 2010
12.6
B
895 HELEN H
IMO 9139115
5,278 1997
12.6
B
894 IBRAHIM KONAN
IMO 9306328
8,107 2006
12.6
B
900 ADA
IMO 1060784
8,311 2024
12.7
B
899 SVEND
IMO 1034357
12,196 2025
12.7
B
Page 18 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.