Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#681 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
10.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
-22% greener
B

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
652 HERMANA
IMO 9545948
12,463 2010
10.6
B
651 CARTAGENA
IMO 9521863
18,809 2012
10.6
B
653 AQUIS PERLA
IMO 9161869
10,132 1997
10.7
B
654 AZORESBORG
IMO 9466051
17,407 2010
10.7
B
655 GOLDEN SEA
IMO 9173355
15,962 1997
10.7
B
656 LAUNKALNE
IMO 9504114
11,048 2010
10.7
B
658 BALTIC CRYSTAL
IMO 9963487
6,458 2023
10.7
B
657 TANARO RIVER
IMO 9631929
7,600 2012
10.7
B
659 VELA
IMO 9149938
6,207 1996
10.7
B
661 CHELSEA-1
IMO 9495612
6,135 2008
10.7
B
660 FWN ATLANTIC
IMO 9931472
12,575 2023
10.7
B
662 MSC SHEILA F
IMO 9180968
18,479 1999
10.7
B
663 BBC KHERSON
IMO 9812016
12,435 2022
10.7
B
664 ATA 2
IMO 9387669
6,300 2006
10.7
B
667 BBC DENMARK
IMO 9605891
25,039 2012
10.8
B
666 BBC SINGAPORE
IMO 9964431
13,418 2024
10.8
B
665 ADAMOON
IMO 9521758
19,582 2011
10.8
B
668 HAYRIYE ANA
IMO 9557953
8,383 2009
10.8
B
669 BBC BREMEN
IMO 9971446
13,406 2025
10.8
B
670 HARTURA
IMO 9546447
12,223 2009
10.8
B
672 SIMONA
IMO 9437763
6,060 2007
10.8
B
671 ONEGO ISLE
IMO 9626156
11,183 2012
10.8
B
673 ESLEM
IMO 9148154
3,452 1997
10.8
B
674 SCALA
IMO 9370628
6,826 2006
10.8
B
675 LARISSA 1
IMO 9154268
17,064 1999
10.8
B
676 ENAS H
IMO 9610822
10,034 2011
10.9
B
677 ELBEBORG
IMO 9568249
12,004 2011
10.9
B
679 VIVIAN
IMO 9620358
7,636 2011
10.9
B
678 JORIX
IMO 9419802
8,191 2006
10.9
B
680 ARUBABORG
IMO 9466295
17,407 2010
10.9
B
681 HOSEI FORTUNE
IMO 9542879
12,916 2009
10.9
B
682 K.DADAYLI
IMO 9513191
9,293 2009
10.9
B
683 CENGIZ AMCA
IMO 9616096
11,051 2013
10.9
B
685 BBC SANTIAGO
IMO 9964429
13,405 2024
10.9
B
684 K HAK
IMO 9532848
12,611 2009
10.9
B
686 SANDRA
IMO 9549669
13,549 2009
10.9
B
687 EEBORG
IMO 9568328
11,901 2012
10.9
B
688 BBC ROSTOV
IMO 9964443
12,422 2024
10.9
B
689 BBC NORWAY
IMO 9593658
24,976 2012
11.0
B
690 ERIEBORG
IMO 9463437
11,217 2009
11.0
B
691 ISMAIL S
IMO 9546007
12,232 2011
11.0
B
692 T-MED
IMO 9163142
6,830 1997
11.0
B
693 COSKUNLAR 2
IMO 8943351
2,276 1998
11.0
B
694 STARVIP
IMO 9326495
18,500 2007
11.0
B
695 HAKKI AYKIN
IMO 9045730
6,962 2004
11.0
B
697 BOHWA QUANZHOU
IMO 9311244
13,276 2004
11.0
B
696 ALGRACE
IMO 9154270
17,064 1999
11.0
B
699 BOZKURT
IMO 9171371
10,555 2000
11.0
B
698 BBC FINLAND
IMO 9593684
24,983 2012
11.0
B
700 ADELHEID BR
IMO 9387621
10,860 2006
11.1
B
Page 14 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.