Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,317 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
25.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
+80% higher
E

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2301 WILSON MONSOON
IMO 9163582
2,780 1997
24.5
E
2302 COE GISELA
IMO 8513314
1,815 1985
24.5
E
2303 HJORDIS
IMO 9126235
6,904 1996
24.5
E
2304 SKOG
IMO 8912039
3,728 1991
24.6
E
2305 FIONA B
IMO 9574303
3,500 2012
24.8
E
2306 WHARFE RIVER
IMO 8903052
3,212 1991
24.8
E
2307 GULF ANGEL
IMO 9125059
4,454 1996
24.9
E
2308 BBC FUJI
IMO 9508419
9,266 2011
24.9
E
2309 BBC VESUVIUS
IMO 9508471
9,310 2012
24.9
E
2310 GOTLAND
IMO 9361366
4,329 2008
24.9
E
2311 INDUSTRIAL DOLPHIN
IMO 9360192
7,996 2007
24.9
E
2312 EMS CALYPSO
IMO 9557393
2,600 2012
25.0
E
2313 MALIK ARCTICA
IMO 9618135
8,438 2017
25.0
E
2314 SCHILLPLATE
IMO 9505285
3,176 2009
25.1
E
2315 WILSON BERGEN
IMO 9557408
2,595 2016
25.1
E
2316 BORKUM
IMO 9457153
5,490 2012
25.1
E
2317 ANA-N
IMO 9416850
3,301 2008
25.3
E
2318 NINA B
IMO 9213703
1,802 2000
25.3
E
2319 RIKKE B
IMO 9574315
3,500 2012
25.4
E
2320 BBC SCANDINAVIA
IMO 9362633
7,534 2007
25.4
E
2321 CARTEN ELINA
IMO 8713653
3,727 1989
25.6
E
2322 RIX MUNTE
IMO 9191254
4,433 1998
25.6
E
2323 FRIENDLAND
IMO 9246906
4,684 2002
25.6
E
2324 GANDA
IMO 9298129
2,637 2003
25.6
E
2325 YUSUF BEY
IMO 9139127
4,766 1997
25.7
E
2326 HOHE BANK
IMO 9505302
3,177 2010
25.8
E
2327 LANGEOOG
IMO 9506136
5,463 2013
25.9
E
2328 NORRBOTTEN
IMO 9191931
5,527 2001
25.9
E
2329 HILDA B
IMO 9466233
3,500 2011
25.9
E
2330 BBC EVEREST
IMO 9508407
9,310 2011
26.0
E
2331 SPIEKEROOG
IMO 9506148
5,489 2013
26.0
E
2332 MAY B
IMO 9138757
2,398 1996
26.1
E
2333 ARINA
IMO 9173446
5,001 1998
26.1
E
2334 WILSON ROTTERDAM
IMO 9557381
2,600 2017
26.1
E
2335 WILSON SAAR
IMO 9125841
1,687 1996
26.2
E
2336 TALINA B
IMO 9466221
3,500 2010
26.2
E
2337 SCOT BAY
IMO 9243930
3,154 2001
26.3
E
2338 SCOT MARINER
IMO 9243916
3,313 2001
26.4
E
2339 CONSTANCE
IMO 9505338
3,196 2011
26.4
E
2340 SCAN FJELL
IMO 8405878
3,040 1985
26.5
E
2341 BBC NAPLES
IMO 9484223
9,775 2010
26.6
E
2342 MARIANNE DANICA
IMO 9006241
2,200 1993
26.6
E
2343 ATLANTIS
IMO 8721533
3,337 1988
26.7
E
2344 LAURA
IMO 9126223
6,940 1996
26.9
E
2345 SONORO
IMO 9199397
4,077 2000
26.9
E
2346 TITUS
IMO 9195470
4,299 2006
26.9
E
2347 NORDERNEY
IMO 9506124
5,476 2012
27.0
E
2348 EEMSLIFT NADINE
IMO 9671436
4,428 2014
27.1
E
2349 AMBER LIGHT
IMO 9158109
4,433 2005
27.1
E
2350 MOHSEN
IMO 8703270
7,443 1987
27.1
E
Page 47 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.