Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#533 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-31% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,300 at D/E
A 1,145B 955C 1,317D 765E 535

4,717 rated vessels · 529 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

93
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
75
'27 Q2
57
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
88
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,934 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,818 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 2,818 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,101
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,980–11,883M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,101 of 1,101 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
504 BEAVER
IMO 9746695
81,769 2017
3.3
A
501 GRAND OCEAN
IMO 9949651
82,689 2023
3.3
A
499 JOLANDA
IMO 9724867
180,579 2015
3.3
A
503 GCL LEADER
IMO 9902550
81,946 2021
3.3
A
502 ALBERTITO
IMO 9748423
61,301 2016
3.3
A
511 JING LU HAI
IMO 9747558
77,927 2015
3.3
A
510 TORO
IMO 9443009
76,636 2008
3.3
A
509 LIVORNO
IMO 9855549
81,651 2019
3.3
A
508 ASTRO SIRIUS
IMO 9848077
63,562 2019
3.3
A
507 MAIA
IMO 9422938
82,193 2009
3.3
A
512 AP DUBROVNIK
IMO 9952660
82,249 2023
3.3
A
506 BBG HECHI
IMO 9929039
82,037 2022
3.3
A
513 SEACON SHANGHAI
IMO 9847889
80,811 2019
3.3
A
517 PISTI
IMO 9893503
81,737 2021
3.3
A
520 CHASSELAS
IMO 9840506
81,758 2019
3.3
A
516 NORD POLARIS
IMO 9728198
81,791 2016
3.3
A
523 ATROTOS HERACLES
IMO 9668879
81,922 2014
3.3
A
522 LOWLANDS FREEDOM
IMO 9942158
64,481 2023
3.3
A
521 HAMPTON OCEAN
IMO 9798844
80,979 2017
3.3
A
515 MONDIAL COSMOS
IMO 9801196
81,611 2017
3.3
A
519 NEFELI
IMO 9317468
77,171 2009
3.3
A
514 PORT OSHIMA
IMO 9932804
64,624 2022
3.3
A
518 ATHINA II
IMO 9724192
82,014 2015
3.3
A
525 SPAR MAIA
IMO 1015155
63,550 2024
3.4
A
524 BBG GRACE
IMO 9702704
81,952 2015
3.4
A
526 VOLUTINA
IMO 9929338
82,408 2022
3.4
A
530 MARTINE
IMO 9411537
86,949 2009
3.4
A
529 ARIANA
IMO 9828297
81,011 2019
3.4
A
532 THREE SASKIAS
IMO 9689811
81,094 2014
3.4
A
528 KYOTO STAR
IMO 9740811
84,956 2016
3.4
A
531 KEY FRONTIER
IMO 9454292
80,679 2011
3.4
A
527 IONIC KIBOU
IMO 9582556
81,889 2015
3.4
A
537 SFERA
IMO 9304576
76,801 2006
3.4
A
539 MSXT THALIA
IMO 9929326
85,204 2022
3.4
A
536 STAR MARIA
IMO 9401489
82,598 2007
3.4
A
535 XING FU HAI
IMO 9949302
85,038 2022
3.4
A
534 MARINE GLORY
IMO 9606754
114,047 2014
3.4
A
533 YASA MARS
IMO 9848120
61,081 2019
3.4
A
538 DIAMOND POWER
IMO 9566590
107,235 2013
3.4
A
543 S SAMBA
IMO 9712486
84,867 2015
3.4
A
544 ROYAL PEARL
IMO 9941972
63,535 2023
3.4
A
542 ANNA-DOROTHEA
IMO 9482213
55,646 2008
3.4
A
545 ASIAN ETERNITY
IMO 9991472
64,683 2024
3.4
A
541 ASTRO VEGA
IMO 9720299
63,008 2015
3.4
A
540 DARYA MA
IMO 9591674
81,874 2011
3.4
A
550 CL GANJIANG
IMO 9953327
64,747 2023
3.4
A
549 POMONE
IMO 9926130
82,247 2021
3.4
A
548 HSL NASSAU
IMO 9802310
63,805 2020
3.4
A
547 AQUAVITA TRUST
IMO 9826445
62,625 2019
3.4
A
546 AFRICAN DRAGON
IMO 9990416
66,647 2024
3.4
A
Page 11 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.