Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,469 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-13% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 632 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

121
Q4
138
'27 Q1
84
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
137
'27 Q4
132
'28 Q1
97
'28 Q2
111
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,728 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,124
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,918–11,738M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,124 of 1,124 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1455 CETUS SPADE
IMO 9731406
43,343 2018
4.2
C
1454 EFFIE
IMO 9591806
81,911 2012
4.2
C
1453 WESTERN TOKYO
IMO 9838498
62,647 2019
4.2
C
1452 FEDERAL PRIDE
IMO 9950612
42,686 2023
4.2
C
1451 GLOBE CLEOPATRA
IMO 9403085
58,765 2009
4.2
C
1450 SOLE
IMO 9650145
58,635 2013
4.2
C
1448 SHEILA
IMO 9730244
58,608 2013
4.2
C
1458 MICHALIS SAN
IMO 9648879
55,782 2013
4.2
C
1464 LOWLANDS LUCK
IMO 9969209
63,482 2023
4.2
C
1468 GOOD HOPE MAX
IMO 9304241
76,739 2005
4.2
C
1463 IVS PHOENIX
IMO 9774862
60,477 2019
4.2
C
1467 AEOLIAN GRACE
IMO 9298258
76,525 2007
4.2
C
1466 GERTRUDE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9727601
80,959 2016
4.2
C
1462 JAWOR
IMO 9452608
79,649 2010
4.2
C
1461 WOLVERINE
IMO 9711327
61,292 2015
4.2
C
1460 ARUNA ECE
IMO 9635406
55,506 2012
4.2
C
1459 WESTERN SANTIAGO
IMO 9838503
62,647 2020
4.2
C
1465 WINNER
IMO 9305087
74,759 2005
4.2
C
1471 ENDURANCE SW
IMO 9681508
60,225 2015
4.2
C
1470 DESERT SEEKER
IMO 9899208
61,000 2019
4.2
C
1469 MAGIA
IMO 9710036
57,586 2015
4.2
C
1475 POPI S
IMO 9527233
80,337 2012
4.2
C
1474 HONEVER
IMO 9533438
61,664 2010
4.2
C
1473 STAR MISTRAL
IMO 9684225
63,306 2014
4.2
C
1472 SPITHA
IMO 9290153
75,411 2005
4.2
C
1476 CYCAS
IMO 9403114
58,710 2007
4.3
C
1478 SPAR CORONA
IMO 9497830
58,018 2011
4.3
C
1477 ATHOS
IMO 9761334
57,420 2016
4.3
C
1483 EMMANUEL
IMO 9705328
63,371 2015
4.3
C
1482 W-OSLO
IMO 9484699
92,997 2011
4.3
C
1484 YOUNG SPIRIT
IMO 9686558
63,567 2015
4.3
C
1481 ETERNAL BRIGHT
IMO 9287780
77,684 2004
4.3
C
1480 CLIA
IMO 9548237
92,968 2012
4.3
C
1479 GENCO ENTERPRISE
IMO 9707699
63,997 2016
4.3
C
1485 ALEXANDRIA
IMO 9592616
82,852 2012
4.3
C
1488 TOMINI FELICITY
IMO 9831799
63,601 2020
4.3
C
1487 SUNISA NAREE
IMO 9751248
63,345 2016
4.3
C
1486 PATRICIA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9464584
114,753 2010
4.3
C
1492 OCEANUS
IMO 9670925
63,385 2015
4.3
C
1491 ANDONIS
IMO 9763916
81,600 2013
4.3
C
1490 MOUNTAIN LION
IMO 9570852
93,296 2010
4.3
C
1489 AQUAPROSPER
IMO 9713416
61,286 2012
4.3
C
1500 SPRING SNOW
IMO 9473274
75,200 2010
4.3
C
1499 LUCENT
IMO 9142215
46,609 1997
4.3
C
1498 SDTR DORIS
IMO 9877860
84,998 2021
4.3
C
1497 CORA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9622916
93,005 2012
4.3
C
1496 YM ADVANCE
IMO 9860685
63,509 2019
4.3
C
1495 DIAMOND QUEEN
IMO 9642136
61,414 2013
4.3
C
1494 ZEUS
IMO 9426049
93,200 2010
4.3
C
1493 PROPEL SUCCESS
IMO 9640607
58,665 2012
4.3
C
Page 30 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.