Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#411 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-40% greener
B

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
401 NORDIC STAR
IMO 9748679
157,737 2016
3.1
B
405 NAUTILUS I
IMO 9298765
163,927 2006
3.1
B
404 VIOLANDO
IMO 9429285
164,764 2009
3.1
B
403 THOMAS ZAFIRAS
IMO 9724087
113,691 2016
3.1
B
402 KEDROS
IMO 1016214
113,920 2025
3.1
B
409 ORIENT M
IMO 9907225
156,729 2022
3.1
B
408 AISOPOS
IMO 9987029
115,621 2025
3.1
B
410 BREEZE
IMO 9809356
156,682 2016
3.1
B
407 NICOLAOS
IMO 9429297
164,758 2010
3.1
B
406 AEGEAN HORIZON
IMO 9326811
158,738 2004
3.1
B
412 MARE PICENUM
IMO 9449405
158,489 2011
3.1
B
411 AQUAHONOR
IMO 9925136
157,747 2020
3.1
B
413 MARLIN LA PLATA
IMO 9823560
114,752 2022
3.1
B
416 STENA SURPRISE
IMO 9533995
158,491 2012
3.1
B
415 POLIEGOS
IMO 9746621
157,540 2017
3.1
B
414 HAFNIA LARVIK
IMO 9946465
109,999 2023
3.1
B
419 CHRISTINA
IMO 9772125
158,902 2015
3.1
B
418 COPPER SPIRIT
IMO 9427639
156,827 2006
3.1
B
417 P. TOKYO
IMO 1057206
114,014 2025
3.1
B
421 TAHITI
IMO 9600877
157,022 2010
3.1
B
420 DF MYSTRAS
IMO 9941702
109,999 2023
3.1
B
422 TORM HELLERUP
IMO 9798002
114,951 2018
3.1
B
426 DF MONTMARTE
IMO 9941714
109,999 2023
3.1
B
428 KUFRA
IMO 9935155
115,519 2023
3.1
B
425 NAVIG8 PRIDE LHJ
IMO 9947366
109,999 2023
3.1
B
424 AFRICA
IMO 9905320
163,220 2022
3.1
B
423 SEAWAYS SAN SABA
IMO 9593426
159,018 2010
3.1
B
427 KASTOS
IMO 1016226
113,897 2025
3.1
B
431 NORDIC MOON
IMO 9742900
154,781 2016
3.1
B
433 COBALT SUN
IMO 9814428
114,395 2015
3.1
B
430 P. MASSPORT
IMO 9997476
114,036 2025
3.1
B
434 NANTUCKET
IMO 9600865
157,000 2010
3.1
B
429 STRYMON
IMO 9938030
115,429 2022
3.1
B
432 AQUAFREEDOM
IMO 9922823
157,746 2020
3.1
B
435 TP SPIRIT
IMO 9645413
114,139 2016
3.1
B
436 MINERVA ASTRA
IMO 9893008
115,484 2021
3.1
B
439 OSLO STAR
IMO 9984883
115,382 2022
3.1
B
438 MINERVA GEORGIA
IMO 9332157
163,417 2008
3.1
B
437 SUMMIT SPIRIT
IMO 9404833
159,955 2008
3.1
B
448 BURRI
IMO 9787948
115,018 2015
3.1
B
441 MARLIN LORETO
IMO 9823558
114,823 2021
3.1
B
440 OTTOMAN SINCERITY
IMO 9788710
152,516 2017
3.1
B
447 MILITOS
IMO 9607435
164,751 2012
3.1
B
446 RED MOON
IMO 9590307
160,024 2012
3.1
B
445 MINERVA CORALIA
IMO 9728239
113,850 2015
3.1
B
444 SAQR
IMO 9956018
113,385 2021
3.1
B
443 MAUI
IMO 1040722
115,173 2025
3.1
B
442 ITHAKI WARRIOR
IMO 9765366
159,962 2014
3.1
B
450 ATLANTIC DIAMOND
IMO 1022457
114,047 2025
3.1
B
449 PENELOPE
IMO 9941726
114,763 2023
3.1
B
Page 9 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.