Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,521 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-10% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1501 ESMERALDA
IMO 9430856
55,582 2009
4.2
C
1504 FEDERAL PRESTIGE
IMO 9942196
42,701 2023
4.2
C
1503 CAPTAIN SITARAS
IMO 9553713
61,000 2022
4.2
C
1502 TREASURE STAR
IMO 9461154
82,206 2010
4.2
C
1508 SUPER NOVA
IMO 9425679
78,833 2010
4.2
C
1507 MIDJUR
IMO 9835771
47,070 2019
4.2
C
1509 JIN XIA FENG
IMO 9611711
81,536 2014
4.2
C
1506 C.S. COSMOS
IMO 1023736
39,841 2024
4.2
C
1505 STAR STONINGTON
IMO 9575151
63,301 2012
4.2
C
1510 ONE ENERGY
IMO 9592123
81,076 2011
4.2
C
1511 SEA TREASURE
IMO 9885427
61,192 2020
4.2
C
1513 CEMTEX INNOVATION
IMO 9593048
81,326 2013
4.2
C
1512 AKSON MEISA
IMO 9446192
56,956 2010
4.2
C
1517 XIN YU
IMO 9244362
74,090 2001
4.2
C
1516 ASTRO GRUMIUM
IMO 9714719
61,305 2015
4.2
C
1515 WADI SAFAGA
IMO 9460734
80,443 2010
4.2
C
1514 ARUNA HULYA
IMO 9635391
55,582 2012
4.2
C
1520 MAJESTIC STAR
IMO 9865568
81,878 2020
4.2
C
1519 ARCOLA
IMO 9932361
63,142 2022
4.2
C
1518 GW ELENI
IMO 9874648
63,538 2020
4.2
C
1532 BRILLIANT VENUS
IMO 9326392
106,482 2008
4.2
C
1533 YEOMAN BRIDGE
IMO 8912302
96,772 1991
4.2
C
1528 TEGEA
IMO 9478937
55,616 2011
4.2
C
1531 UNION TRADER
IMO 9445710
57,700 2010
4.2
C
1530 ANGELE N
IMO 9509528
55,804 2010
4.2
C
1529 MICHALIS SAN
IMO 9648879
55,782 2013
4.2
C
1527 STAR VALENCIA
IMO 9699311
63,556 2015
4.2
C
1526 TAI SPLENDOR
IMO 9727132
60,618 2015
4.2
C
1525 ZALIV
IMO 9935806
61,146 2022
4.2
C
1524 SPRING RAINBOW
IMO 9666041
63,234 2014
4.2
C
1523 PREMIERSHIP
IMO 9398747
170,024 2006
4.2
C
1522 MERGANSER
IMO 9959084
39,971 2023
4.2
C
1521 APHROS
IMO 9460514
56,108 2013
4.2
C
1534 THEMIS
IMO 9452543
58,486 2007
4.2
C
1539 PAN TOPAZ
IMO 9625827
82,784 2012
4.2
C
1540 CAPTAIN LEONARD
IMO 9425887
58,091 2010
4.2
C
1538 VERBIER
IMO 9529619
71,066 2012
4.2
C
1545 KHADEEJAH JAHAN II
IMO 9407536
55,486 2009
4.2
C
1544 FATEMA JAHAN II
IMO 9425772
58,096 2010
4.2
C
1541 AURORA
IMO 9537630
79,607 2010
4.2
C
1537 BERGE YOTEI
IMO 9866691
59,995 2020
4.2
C
1543 CHRYSANTHE
IMO 9497086
32,500 2011
4.2
C
1542 AERIKO
IMO 9681546
63,500 2013
4.2
C
1536 XI HU
IMO 9707704
63,519 2019
4.2
C
1535 MISTRAL I
IMO 9650860
81,813 2013
4.2
C
1550 AMIS TREASURE
IMO 9865362
61,125 2020
4.2
C
1549 PACIFIC ACHIEVEMENT
IMO 9712917
61,414 2016
4.2
C
1548 STAR BETTY
IMO 9589683
81,168 2011
4.2
C
1547 NING YUE HAI
IMO 9751339
63,561 2017
4.2
C
1546 BBG BRIGHT
IMO 9598177
82,043 2012
4.2
C
Page 31 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.