Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#850 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
9.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-1% greener
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
801 SELANGOR PARK
IMO 1016185
19,989 2025
9.0
C
802 BOW EXPLORER
IMO 9828211
38,235 2020
9.0
C
803 ARS ET LABOUR
IMO 9396385
40,416 2008
9.0
C
804 ORIENTAL SAKURA
IMO 9743746
16,090 2015
9.1
C
805 BOW LYNX
IMO 9989194
25,914 2024
9.1
C
806 STOLT MERCURY
IMO 9739329
27,578 2017
9.1
C
807 ORIENTAL VIOLA
IMO 9824928
16,293 2020
9.1
C
808 SEYCHELLES PROGRESS
IMO 9298181
37,558 2005
9.1
C
809 XT DOLPHIN
IMO 9672478
27,259 2013
9.1
C
810 SERENA M
IMO 9444508
34,999 2010
9.1
C
811 ALLEGRA
IMO 9436707
40,408 2009
9.1
C
812 PEONIA
IMO 9313436
28,987 2005
9.1
C
813 EASTERLY AS OMARIA
IMO 9363819
19,974 2007
9.1
C
814 LIPARI M
IMO 9587817
37,583 2011
9.1
C
815 WAN HE
IMO 9248461
24,404 2002
9.1
C
816 HONOR GALAXY
IMO 9860207
21,028 2019
9.2
C
817 NINA AN
IMO 9451733
40,399 2010
9.2
C
818 ATLAS STAR
IMO 9376828
38,289 2008
9.2
C
819 DIDIMON
IMO 9288772
37,432 2005
9.2
C
820 ICHESIA M
IMO 9436678
40,429 2009
9.2
C
821 MINERVA TYCHI
IMO 9723291
39,070 2016
9.2
C
822 STOLT ZULU
IMO 9351531
25,197 2006
9.2
C
823 MTM SAVANNAH
IMO 9726750
22,430 2015
9.2
C
824 MARIA M
IMO 9301885
34,999 2006
9.2
C
825 HAFNIA MALACCA
IMO 9725627
39,067 2015
9.2
C
826 ORIENTAL COSMOS
IMO 9800049
16,296 2019
9.2
C
827 ARDMORE CHIPPEWA
IMO 9707871
25,211 2013
9.2
C
828 GINGA THRESHER
IMO 9829746
25,174 2019
9.2
C
829 BOW CECIL
IMO 9143219
37,369 1998
9.2
C
830 STOLT SINCERITY
IMO 9680085
38,850 2016
9.2
C
831 ARDMORE CHINOOK
IMO 9707869
25,233 2013
9.2
C
832 EASTERLY BIRDIE
IMO 9423724
25,399 2009
9.2
C
833 FAIRCHEM PROTEA
IMO 9908346
19,959 2021
9.2
C
834 AQUA RAY
IMO 9973676
21,950 2023
9.3
C
835 LOUIS P
IMO 9749336
25,161 2014
9.3
C
836 STOLT INTEGRITY
IMO 9680097
38,853 2017
9.3
C
837 EK-STREAM
IMO 9808261
19,881 2018
9.3
C
838 KRITI SAILOR
IMO 9335135
37,448 2007
9.3
C
839 FURANO GALAXY
IMO 9804928
25,357 2020
9.3
C
840 MIAMI
IMO 9304320
19,991 2005
9.3
C
841 FORTE GALAXY
IMO 9817585
19,971 2018
9.3
C
842 STOLT LOTUS
IMO 9617648
30,345 2014
9.3
C
843 CHEM SELENIUM
IMO 9817509
19,998 2018
9.3
C
844 MH FUTURE
IMO 9986001
19,727 2024
9.3
C
845 BOCHEM NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9973303
26,574 2024
9.3
C
846 CHEM ALTAMIRA
IMO 9705744
19,998 2015
9.3
C
847 FAIRCHEM HAWK
IMO 9804813
19,956 2019
9.3
C
848 LAVENDER RAY
IMO 9740794
19,994 2017
9.3
C
849 PRABHU MIHIKAA
IMO 9674775
25,926 2014
9.3
C
850 LILAC RAY
IMO 9883481
21,028 2020
9.3
C
Page 17 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.