Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,169 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
13.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+41% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1151 GOLDEN OAK
IMO 9445655
13,167 2007
12.9
E
1152 CHEM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9640140
19,804 2014
12.9
E
1153 SONGA FALCON
IMO 9396012
25,418 2009
12.9
E
1154 HANA I
IMO 9340398
13,027 2007
13.0
E
1155 SWIFT
IMO 9464376
37,565 2010
13.0
E
1156 CHEMICAL RANGER
IMO 9940746
14,513 2023
13.0
E
1157 SWAN PRIDE
IMO 9806665
12,686 2017
13.0
E
1158 ELISABETH SCHULTE
IMO 9439840
16,371 2006
13.1
E
1159 MTM HOUSTON
IMO 9505924
19,741 2010
13.1
E
1160 MAVKA
IMO 9284647
13,602 2004
13.1
E
1161 BARBOUNI
IMO 9416020
19,822 2007
13.1
E
1162 STEN SKAGEN
IMO 9460239
18,531 2009
13.1
E
1163 THRACIA KA
IMO 9493377
13,581 2008
13.1
E
1164 THE AMIGO
IMO 9492309
14,911 2012
13.1
E
1165 TATLISU
IMO 9282364
8,521 2003
13.1
E
1166 MOSTRAUM
IMO 9829784
10,234 2019
13.1
E
1167 HICRI KAAN
IMO 9171474
10,378 1998
13.2
E
1168 ERIKA SCHULTE
IMO 9439864
16,427 2006
13.2
E
1169 CHEMICAL VOYAGER
IMO 9330379
14,246 2005
13.3
E
1170 SWAN DIGNITY
IMO 9806706
12,661 2017
13.3
E
1171 SAMC SWAN
IMO 9813058
8,707 2019
13.4
E
1172 JUTLANDIA SWAN
IMO 9736638
12,442 2015
13.4
E
1173 SLOMAN HERA
IMO 9466714
16,426 2012
13.4
E
1174 KORSARO
IMO 9373137
25,997 2008
13.5
E
1175 EVA TOKYO
IMO 9865520
19,841 2019
13.5
E
1176 CAESAR
IMO 9235696
40,083 2002
13.5
E
1177 XT EXPLORATION
IMO 1043023
13,109 2024
13.5
E
1178 TRANS TIND
IMO 9594054
14,281 2010
13.5
E
1179 UIKKU
IMO 9797814
17,500 2018
13.5
E
1180 LUNNI
IMO 9797802
17,500 2018
13.5
E
1181 OWL 5
IMO 9439357
13,062 2007
13.6
E
1182 LAGERTHA 1
IMO 9410143
19,999 2006
13.6
E
1183 SOLIS
IMO 9276248
21,181 2003
13.6
E
1184 SAKURA THERESA
IMO 1026776
13,139 2025
13.6
E
1185 BOMAR HAWK
IMO 9396000
25,385 2008
13.6
E
1186 DILIGENT STAR
IMO 9222651
19,998 2000
13.7
E
1187 FT QUARTO
IMO 9447330
18,000 2012
13.8
E
1188 HEINRICH
IMO 9350757
17,998 2008
13.8
E
1189 VIKSTRAUM
IMO 9829796
10,232 2019
13.8
E
1190 EMMY SCHULTE
IMO 9394519
16,669 2006
13.9
E
1191 STOLT OCELOT
IMO 9459539
23,324 2008
13.9
E
1192 EXCELLO
IMO 9308558
19,999 2008
13.9
E
1193 EVA SCHULTE
IMO 9439826
16,621 2006
13.9
E
1194 PVT SUNRISE
IMO 9565742
19,806 2011
13.9
E
1195 CHEMICAL TRAVELLER
IMO 9804851
12,522 2019
14.0
E
1196 ATLANTIC WIND
IMO 9341316
15,652 2007
14.0
E
1197 IMERA
IMO 9458066
14,391 2011
14.1
E
1198 PORTOLA
IMO 9449443
12,835 2010
14.1
E
1199 CHEMICAL LUNA
IMO 9521423
14,304 2008
14.1
E
1200 ARAL
IMO 8125454
8,915 1982
14.2
E
Page 24 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.