Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#453 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
7.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-44% greener
A

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 223 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

45
Q4
39
'27 Q1
40
'27 Q2
34
'27 Q3
32
'27 Q4
30
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
28
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 648 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
451 NEPTUNE
IMO 9011961
3,766 1991
7.7
A
452 STAR HUANGSHAN
IMO 9438365
34,022 2010
7.7
A
453 DA XIANG
IMO 9768552
28,577 2017
7.8
A
454 PACIFIC VICTOR
IMO 9458456
28,309 2014
7.8
A
455 DA QING
IMO 9768540
28,605 2017
7.8
A
456 MANTA HACER
IMO 9303429
32,316 2004
7.8
A
457 KAPADOKYA
IMO 9268083
31,646 2004
7.8
A
458 PRINCE HADI
IMO 9125217
26,412 1997
7.9
A
459 SIMAG SHANGHAI
IMO 9695119
27,263 2014
7.9
A
460 BERKAY N
IMO 9524827
12,046 2008
7.9
A
461 ATLANTIC RUNNER II
IMO 9509619
33,150 2010
7.9
A
462 MISJE VIOLA
IMO 9927445
5,310 2023
7.9
A
463 MU DAN SONG
IMO 9608831
27,411 2012
7.9
A
464 AAL GENOA
IMO 9393553
25,733 2010
7.9
A
466 TRANSNORDIC
IMO 9602174
34,827 2012
7.9
A
465 AGIA DOXA
IMO 9467976
33,261 2010
7.9
A
467 OCEAN SKY
IMO 9354064
18,951 2006
8.0
A
468 TRANSARCTIC
IMO 9674921
26,052 2013
8.0
A
469 GEM STAR
IMO 9496173
33,171 2011
8.0
A
470 SERVET ANA
IMO 9443774
30,124 2006
8.0
A
471 MUAZZEZ K
IMO 9758961
12,549 2016
8.0
A
472 CHIPOLBROK STAR
IMO 9432127
30,346 2010
8.1
A
473 SERGEY BODROV
IMO 9458432
28,309 2012
8.1
A
474 AFRICAN WIND
IMO 9423633
28,450 2010
8.1
A
476 LADY SACHA
IMO 9299460
27,638 2004
8.1
A
475 BC RAEDA
IMO 9487598
24,959 2011
8.1
A
477 ARTAX
IMO 9623063
37,072 2014
8.1
B
478 AAL SINGAPORE
IMO 9498365
32,134 2011
8.1
B
479 AAL GALVESTON
IMO 9393577
25,774 2010
8.1
B
481 MGD JOY
IMO 9427586
26,307 2011
8.2
B
480 TONAL
IMO 9576129
7,852 2010
8.2
B
482 NC CAPTAIN
IMO 9335707
6,867 2004
8.2
B
483 ALEXIA
IMO 9997282
14,404 2024
8.2
B
484 INVENTANA
IMO 9186223
44,982 2000
8.3
B
485 MISJE VITA
IMO 9927421
5,310 2022
8.3
B
486 MAXIMA
IMO 9882061
14,345 2021
8.3
B
487 COMPADRE
IMO 9506100
23,003 2009
8.3
B
489 SIDER LUCK
IMO 9495595
26,307 2012
8.4
B
488 DA JI
IMO 9768538
28,612 2016
8.4
B
491 MISJE LILY
IMO 1049730
5,309 2025
8.4
B
490 QIAN KUN
IMO 9432165
30,281 2011
8.4
B
492 VAFAA M
IMO 9162409
25,008 1997
8.4
B
493 YASMINA
IMO 9177765
13,347 1998
8.4
B
494 TRANSAMERICA
IMO 9486257
26,391 2010
8.5
B
497 SKYHIGH SW
IMO 9606663
14,260 2011
8.5
B
496 CHIPOLBROK PACIFIC
IMO 9710177
31,615 2015
8.5
B
495 VERTOM WILLEMIJN
IMO 9993286
7,306 2025
8.5
B
499 DA GUI
IMO 9768564
28,606 2017
8.5
B
498 ADAMAR
IMO 9515280
17,660 2009
8.5
B
500 GUANA
IMO 9180956
18,966 1999
8.5
B
Page 10 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.