Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,229 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
5.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
+8% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2201 SUN SHINE
IMO 9405435
53,554 2007
5.0
D
2202 SUPRA BARON
IMO 9409077
55,651 2009
5.0
D
2203 NORDSEINE
IMO 9596052
38,036 2015
5.0
D
2204 STAR CHALLENGER
IMO 9632997
61,462 2012
5.0
D
2205 HUPEH
IMO 9714264
39,773 2016
5.1
D
2206 BC MIRABEL
IMO 9531662
58,186 2013
5.1
D
2207 BERGE BEN NEVIS
IMO 9782974
37,681 2017
5.1
D
2208 NAFISA JAHAN
IMO 9303091
56,070 2006
5.1
D
2209 HONG RUN 16
IMO 9317420
52,905 2006
5.1
D
2210 ROSTRUM SOLAR
IMO 9941623
40,071 2024
5.1
D
2211 AFRICAN GANNET
IMO 9749233
37,806 2018
5.1
D
2212 WADI ALKARM
IMO 9460760
80,533 2011
5.1
D
2213 PAN QUEEN
IMO 9487419
56,933 2011
5.1
D
2214 AFRICAN NIGHTHAWK
IMO 9646895
40,481 2014
5.1
D
2215 LALLY SCHULTE
IMO 9725897
43,457 2013
5.1
D
2216 BLUE FIN
IMO 9607277
56,780 2011
5.1
D
2217 STAR HARRIER
IMO 9941544
40,393 2022
5.1
D
2218 KRAIT
IMO 9622837
56,100 2013
5.1
D
2219 LIBRA-XS
IMO 9282742
52,441 2003
5.1
D
2220 PORTSMOUTH
IMO 9979474
40,547 2024
5.1
D
2221 DENSA EAGLE
IMO 9432488
55,089 2006
5.1
D
2222 ROSTRUM HAMBURG
IMO 9997268
40,012 2024
5.1
D
2223 LUCKY BELLA
IMO 9286970
76,263 2005
5.1
D
2224 GREY LUNA
IMO 9578775
56,697 2011
5.1
D
2225 MED LIGURIA
IMO 9604811
51,156 2012
5.1
D
2226 MANDARIN CHINA
IMO 9569243
56,778 2011
5.1
D
2227 CRANE
IMO 9441283
57,809 2010
5.1
D
2228 SETO HARMONY
IMO 9881160
39,943 2020
5.1
D
2229 PORT SHANGHAI
IMO 9423528
58,747 2009
5.1
D
2230 KAMARI
IMO 9412634
53,822 2011
5.1
D
2231 SIDER VANCOUVER
IMO 9919541
37,722 2022
5.1
D
2232 MAI TAI
IMO 9709221
38,792 2015
5.1
D
2233 FEDERAL MICHIGAN
IMO 9975416
34,763 2024
5.1
D
2234 SUPER RICE
IMO 9621792
56,615 2013
5.1
D
2235 CRIMSON SAPPHIRE
IMO 1014163
40,435 2024
5.1
D
2236 NORD NORFOLK
IMO 9984479
40,232 2024
5.1
D
2237 SPAR CAPELLA
IMO 9490844
58,018 2011
5.1
D
2238 ILIANA
IMO 9490715
58,018 2010
5.1
D
2239 EUCALYPTUS
IMO 9832456
36,896 2015
5.1
D
2240 SILVER LADY
IMO 9279367
50,329 2003
5.1
D
2241 REIWA BREEZE
IMO 9757802
37,721 2016
5.1
D
2242 RED DIAMOND
IMO 9331713
53,430 2011
5.1
D
2243 LADY
IMO 9737369
63,194 2015
5.1
D
2244 SEACON 7
IMO 9487665
56,880 2012
5.1
D
2245 OCEAN PERA
IMO 9712955
55,837 2015
5.1
D
2246 PAPA JOHN
IMO 9555149
56,543 2010
5.1
D
2247 LINK AMICI
IMO 9728394
34,398 2015
5.1
D
2248 WU YANG FORTUNE
IMO 9294214
52,050 2004
5.1
D
2249 FRIDA BULKER
IMO 9968970
40,161 2023
5.1
D
2250 SIDER HARMONY
IMO 9780964
38,581 2020
5.1
D
Page 45 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.