Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,396 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
7.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
+47% higher
E

CII band distribution

552 at D/E
A 412B 557C 554D 355E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 266 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

39
Q3
49
Q4
65
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
40
'27 Q4
48
'28 Q1
42
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,872 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,753 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,191 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,157 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 858 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 776 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

386
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,607–3,828M
capex range, top measure per vessel (386 of 386 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1351 EAGLE BARENTS
IMO 9676125
119,690 2015
7.0
E
1352 ALPINE LINK
IMO 9478614
50,208 2010
7.0
E
1353 LOULOULIGHT
IMO 9594901
74,986 2013
7.0
E
1354 ILAN
IMO 9282510
46,874 2004
7.0
E
1355 HARDRADA
IMO 9344007
45,983 2007
7.0
E
1356 KAREN MAERSK
IMO 9423712
39,708 2010
7.0
E
1357 BALOS
IMO 9323560
40,165 2008
7.0
E
1358 OM SINGAPORE
IMO 9341433
29,015 2007
7.0
E
1359 HISTRIA GEMMA
IMO 9436719
40,404 2010
7.0
E
1360 STAR C
IMO 9411135
37,836 2009
7.0
E
1361 MINERVA ANNA
IMO 9298507
50,922 2005
7.0
E
1362 TWINKLE STAR
IMO 9363780
45,750 2006
7.0
E
1363 WHITE PEARL
IMO 9917957
36,754 2021
7.1
E
1364 STAMOS
IMO 9592276
115,497 2012
7.1
E
1365 MERSINI
IMO 9405899
51,753 2009
7.1
E
1366 SEAFRONTIER
IMO 9457268
48,580 2011
7.1
E
1367 IOANNIS ZAFIRAKIS
IMO 9890587
49,999 2021
7.1
E
1368 OCEAN VENTURE
IMO 9660657
49,995 2014
7.2
E
1369 HISTRIA AGATA
IMO 9357559
40,440 2007
7.2
E
1370 T.SUNA
IMO 9652911
51,532 2012
7.2
E
1371 HISTRIA TIGER
IMO 9396335
40,420 2008
7.3
E
1372 POLKA
IMO 9422641
37,759 2009
7.3
E
1373 DARIKA
IMO 9506693
51,063 2011
7.3
E
1374 TORILL KNUTSEN
IMO 9630030
123,166 2013
7.3
E
1375 CLEAN NIRVANA
IMO 9308168
50,319 2008
7.3
E
1376 JAG PRERANA
IMO 9321952
47,848 2007
7.3
E
1377 ZEAL START
IMO 9379064
41,369 2009
7.3
E
1378 STI POPLAR
IMO 9696589
38,734 2014
7.4
E
1379 CHEM GUARD
IMO 9261762
34,551 2002
7.4
E
1380 SAPSAN
IMO 9311713
47,496 2005
7.4
E
1381 ROSE I
IMO 9376945
37,900 2007
7.4
E
1382 PINE MEADOW
IMO 9478688
50,171 2010
7.4
E
1383 KIRSTEN MAERSK
IMO 9431264
39,729 2010
7.4
E
1384 CHAMPION POMER
IMO 9455739
52,579 2011
7.4
E
1385 P. BEVERLY HILLS
IMO 9794068
157,285 2019
7.4
E
1386 ORFEAS
IMO 9358917
73,730 2008
7.4
E
1387 HISTRIA CORAL
IMO 9301299
39,999 2006
7.4
E
1388 JOYCE
IMO 9338814
47,344 2007
7.4
E
1389 CHAMPION ENDURANCE
IMO 9288813
46,803 2005
7.5
E
1390 SIRTAKI
IMO 9369887
51,442 2009
7.5
E
1391 VS LISBETH
IMO 9309978
38,492 2006
7.5
E
1392 CECH
IMO 9617442
42,150 2012
7.5
E
1393 HISTRIA GIADA
IMO 9396323
40,448 2007
7.6
E
1394 VS SPIRIT
IMO 9339636
34,671 2007
7.6
E
1395 VALVERDE
IMO 9391490
50,633 2008
7.6
E
1396 MAERSK KATE
IMO 9431276
39,755 2010
7.6
E
1397 MINERVA ANTONIA
IMO 9380398
46,923 2008
7.7
E
1398 STI PIMLICO
IMO 9686871
38,734 2014
7.7
E
1399 MAERSK ADRIATIC
IMO 9636632
37,538 2012
7.7
E
1400 VS LEIA
IMO 9303730
38,461 2006
7.7
E
Page 28 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.