Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,106 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
22.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.89)
+122% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.22
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2101 MEANDI
IMO 9328039
804 TEU 2006
23.4
E
2102 ZIM AUSTRALIA
IMO 9366445
1,155 TEU 2007
23.4
E
2103 CMA CGM DAKHLA
IMO 9461594
1,036 TEU 2008
23.5
E
2104 K-OCEAN
IMO 9143972
700 TEU 1998
23.6
E
2105 CT ROTTERDAM
IMO 9395575
974 TEU 2009
23.7
E
2106 ELBCARRIER
IMO 9388510
974 TEU 2007
23.7
E
2107 CANDELARIA B
IMO 9277395
822 TEU 2003
23.7
E
2108 ATLANTICO
IMO 9641314
880 TEU 2014
23.8
E
2109 HENRIKE SCHEPERS
IMO 9404091
803 TEU 2008
23.8
E
2110 X-PRESS GODAVARI
IMO 9353735
917 TEU 2008
23.9
E
2111 RIDER
IMO 9322566
804 TEU 2006
23.9
E
2112 FENJA
IMO 9287716
864 TEU 2003
23.9
E
2113 NANTO
IMO 9083043
749 TEU 1994
24.0
E
2114 ANDREA
IMO 9333357
868 TEU 2005
24.0
E
2115 BG IRELAND
IMO 9355446
850 TEU 2007
24.1
E
2116 HELGAFELL
IMO 9306017
908 TEU 2005
24.1
E
2117 BF CARODA
IMO 9297618
862 TEU 2004
24.1
E
2118 FREYA
IMO 9219874
658 TEU 2000
24.2
E
2119 BERNHARD SCHEPERS
IMO 9492505
1,036 TEU 2011
24.2
E
2120 ILHA DA MADEIRA
IMO 9202077
712 TEU 1999
24.2
E
2121 MIRROR
IMO 9328041
804 TEU 2007
24.3
E
2122 EF AVA
IMO 9389306
698 TEU 2008
24.3
E
2123 ADMIRAL MOON
IMO 9437220
980 TEU 2008
24.4
E
2124 RIJNBORG
IMO 9355812
1,712 TEU 2007
24.4
E
2125 JORK RULER
IMO 9328027
804 TEU 2006
24.4
E
2126 NJORD
IMO 9349227
809 TEU 2007
24.4
E
2127 SANTUCA B
IMO 9287687
864 TEU 2003
24.4
E
2128 SAMSKIP INNOVATOR
IMO 9436214
803 TEU 2011
24.5
E
2129 MSC LENA F
IMO 9347762
916 TEU 2006
24.5
E
2130 PANDA 002
IMO 9328053
804 TEU 2007
24.6
E
2131 MSC MANON
IMO 9435820
916 TEU 2008
24.6
E
2132 SPIRIT
IMO 9302255
809 TEU 2005
24.7
E
2133 VERONICA B
IMO 9436305
803 TEU 2011
24.7
E
2134 K-RIVER
IMO 9138355
700 TEU 1997
24.8
E
2135 MSC AMIHAN F
IMO 9449687
957 TEU 2008
24.9
E
2136 ENCOUNTER
IMO 9255775
750 TEU 2004
24.9
E
2137 EMILIA
IMO 9197521
700 TEU 2010
24.9
E
2138 ALEXANDER
IMO 9347798
916 TEU 2006
25.1
E
2139 ENFORCER
IMO 9255737
750 TEU 2003
25.2
E
2140 RANGER
IMO 9322542
804 TEU 2005
25.2
E
2141 ADMIRAL SUN
IMO 9437244
980 TEU 2008
25.2
E
2142 AURORA
IMO 9234989
868 TEU 2001
25.2
E
2143 MACARENA B
IMO 9277400
864 TEU 2003
25.2
E
2144 ELBSPRINTER
IMO 9349215
809 TEU 2007
25.3
E
2145 BF ESPERANZA
IMO 9252785
862 TEU 2003
25.3
E
2146 CONTSHIP IVY
IMO 9371402
925 TEU 2007
25.4
E
2147 MEDKON FUN
IMO 9308613
916 TEU 2006
25.4
E
2148 MAIKE D
IMO 9226372
660 TEU 2000
25.4
E
2149 SVEN-D
IMO 9302243
809 TEU 2005
25.4
E
2150 ENERGY
IMO 9255787
750 TEU 2004
25.4
E
Page 43 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.