Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,642 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-8% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1600 MTR JUPITER
IMO 1015753
40,502 2025
4.3
C
1605 HSL MEXICO
IMO 9897561
61,167 2020
4.3
C
1612 ANNELIESE
IMO 1015325
40,398 2024
4.3
C
1604 PETROS S
IMO 9490753
58,018 2010
4.3
C
1611 VERBIER
IMO 9529619
70,050 2012
4.3
C
1610 BULK INDEPENDENCE
IMO 9374002
56,548 2008
4.3
C
1609 PACIFIC ACTIVITY
IMO 9731901
63,601 2017
4.3
C
1603 EVA PARIS
IMO 9863871
63,680 2021
4.3
C
1607 GRANDE ISLAND
IMO 9496214
58,110 2009
4.3
C
1606 SM SANTOS
IMO 9842516
80,857 2020
4.3
C
1602 AL LULU
IMO 9583627
57,000 2010
4.3
C
1608 QINGHE
IMO 9324631
52,450 2006
4.3
C
1613 MOON
IMO 9635690
80,505 2012
4.3
C
1617 LEM GLADIOLUS
IMO 9845817
64,651 2015
4.3
C
1616 KANAGI RIVER
IMO 9972036
40,041 2024
4.3
C
1615 APOLO
IMO 9296793
77,326 2006
4.3
C
1614 IOLAOS
IMO 9696450
63,413 2016
4.3
C
1619 ZHENG FAN
IMO 9296858
87,052 2005
4.3
C
1618 ASPEN TRADER
IMO 9989302
40,608 2024
4.3
C
1620 INCE SOUTHWIND
IMO 9969170
63,703 2023
4.3
C
1621 NEGMAR YAKO I
IMO 9625463
38,674 2011
4.3
C
1630 PROPEL SHAKTI
IMO 9640592
58,642 2012
4.3
C
1628 ELISA
IMO 9730232
58,623 2016
4.3
C
1629 ADA
IMO 9727156
81,841 2016
4.3
C
1625 KIRAN MARMARA
IMO 9576985
63,714 2014
4.3
C
1627 GOLDEN AMBER
IMO 9458987
74,753 2017
4.3
C
1626 PAN SAPPHIRE
IMO 9860386
62,569 2020
4.3
C
1624 LUCKY GLORY 3
IMO 9464508
76,619 2008
4.3
C
1623 BBC MERCURY
IMO 9965588
39,869 2023
4.3
C
1622 EVA GLOBAL
IMO 9972452
40,553 2023
4.3
C
1634 BUFFLEHEAD
IMO 9926063
39,982 2022
4.3
C
1636 MH LANGOEY
IMO 1076173
63,697 2025
4.3
C
1633 ATALANDI
IMO 9658886
77,528 2014
4.3
C
1641 MARINE GLORY
IMO 9606754
114,047 2014
4.3
C
1640 KARPATHOS DAWN
IMO 9427342
56,700 2010
4.3
C
1637 KING LAN
IMO 9216406
73,926 2001
4.3
C
1632 GOOD WISH
IMO 9502623
75,019 2011
4.3
C
1639 CS HANGZHOU
IMO 9830070
81,600 2014
4.3
C
1638 THOR CHAICHANA
IMO 9638501
58,605 2013
4.3
C
1631 KATJA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9867554
81,297 2020
4.3
C
1635 EASTERN ZINNIA
IMO 9624093
81,792 2013
4.3
C
1650 ROSTRUM OPTIMA
IMO 9941635
40,030 2024
4.3
C
1649 CENTURION BUYO
IMO 9975208
40,503 2024
4.3
C
1648 FENG HUI HAI
IMO 9727649
63,261 2017
4.3
C
1647 SOUTHERN HAWK
IMO 9858527
80,681 2019
4.3
C
1646 JABAL HARIM
IMO 9722053
63,277 2016
4.3
C
1645 EARTH HARMONY
IMO 9832470
36,908 2020
4.3
C
1644 SACHI
IMO 9826457
64,499 2020
4.3
C
1643 VICTORIA MAY
IMO 9730220
58,634 2016
4.3
C
1642 DSI POLARIS
IMO 9738349
60,404 2018
4.3
C
Page 33 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.