Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#926 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
9.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+6% higher
D

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
901 FALCON GALAXY
IMO 9799642
19,952 2018
9.7
D
902 TG LEO
IMO 9640097
19,801 2012
9.8
D
903 ORIENTAL GERBERA
IMO 9924716
16,279 2022
9.8
D
904 CIELO DI ULSAN
IMO 9717266
39,060 2015
9.8
D
905 DAMIANIA
IMO 9308235
20,768 2006
9.8
D
906 STOLT BASUTO
IMO 9351543
25,197 2006
9.8
D
907 HTM GRENADIER
IMO 9587829
37,583 2011
9.8
D
908 MOCKINGBIRD
IMO 9942689
19,999 2022
9.8
D
909 JBU ONYX
IMO 9392999
19,864 2008
9.8
D
910 RADIANT RAY
IMO 9749697
19,974 2018
9.8
D
911 STOLT ILEX
IMO 9505936
19,735 2010
9.8
D
912 EASTERLY JUPITER
IMO 9383962
36,677 2009
9.8
D
913 CHEMSTAR SAPPHIRE
IMO 9804904
19,993 2019
9.8
D
914 CHEM STREAM
IMO 9479979
19,998 2010
9.8
D
915 CHEM BARCELONA
IMO 9725835
19,997 2016
9.8
D
916 STOLT PERSEVERANCE
IMO 9124471
37,059 2001
9.9
D
917 CHEM SPICA
IMO 9739264
25,268 2014
9.9
D
918 GINGA CARACAL
IMO 9426300
25,876 2009
9.9
D
919 BOCHEM BAYARD
IMO 9749611
25,283 2014
9.9
D
920 GINGA PIONEER
IMO 9965552
26,222 2024
9.9
D
921 MH SHOGUN
IMO 9986013
19,769 2025
9.9
D
922 THUN LIFFEY
IMO 9829007
18,684 2020
9.9
D
923 CONTI BENGUELA
IMO 9391373
37,652 2008
9.9
D
924 TERN VIK
IMO 9988970
15,109 2025
9.9
D
925 TERN ISLAND
IMO 9909649
15,024 2021
9.9
D
926 SLOGEN
IMO 9733375
19,996 2016
9.9
D
927 EASTERLY EAGLE
IMO 9423750
25,390 2010
9.9
D
928 STOLT INNOVATION
IMO 9102069
36,876 1996
10.0
D
929 SWAN INDIAN
IMO 9724051
19,855 2015
10.0
D
930 SARUS CRANE
IMO 9952127
19,772 2022
10.0
D
931 CHEM BROADWAY
IMO 9938004
33,450 2025
10.0
D
932 KOMODO PARK
IMO 9981465
19,981 2024
10.0
D
933 QD SPRING
IMO 9330460
19,870 2005
10.0
D
934 BOCHEM LONDON
IMO 9743849
19,999 2014
10.1
D
935 GOBY
IMO 9363833
19,994 2008
10.1
D
936 HALTI
IMO 9818278
17,993 2019
10.1
D
937 STOLT BETULA
IMO 9266267
25,023 2003
10.1
D
938 SOLAR AILENE
IMO 9877664
25,039 2018
10.1
D
939 AMBER RAY
IMO 9973664
21,945 2023
10.1
D
940 GINGA MARITA
IMO 9558402
19,909 2012
10.1
D
941 GINGA LEOPARD
IMO 9425992
25,982 2008
10.1
D
942 STOLT SEQUOIA
IMO 9235062
37,620 2003
10.1
D
943 NORDIC ACE
IMO 9800104
16,230 2018
10.1
D
944 TERN FORS
IMO 9909651
15,034 2022
10.1
D
945 PRABHU PARVATI
IMO 9423621
19,918 2008
10.1
D
946 MAPLE OCEAN
IMO 1043011
13,221 2024
10.1
D
947 PRIMO M
IMO 1021685
18,669 2025
10.1
D
948 TONDA
IMO 9274654
36,803 2005
10.1
D
949 HAI XING
IMO 9291066
16,882 2004
10.1
D
950 CHEM BARIUM
IMO 9838670
19,999 2019
10.2
D
Page 19 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.