Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#663 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-13% greener
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
651 STOLT MERCURY
IMO 9739329
27,578 2017
8.5
C
652 SOLAR SUZANNE
IMO 9877638
25,039 2018
8.5
C
653 HAFNIA SOYA
IMO 9729271
39,067 2015
8.5
C
654 MH FUTURE
IMO 9986001
19,727 2024
8.5
C
655 SAGAMI
IMO 9379911
33,614 2008
8.5
C
656 BOW NEON
IMO 9777369
27,601 2017
8.5
C
657 LADY RINA
IMO 9631383
39,310 2012
8.5
C
658 ANGI
IMO 9253246
37,211 2003
8.5
C
659 EASTERLY LIME GALAXY
IMO 9380972
19,992 2008
8.5
C
660 OTTO H
IMO 9749374
25,161 2014
8.6
C
661 RAMIRA
IMO 9890599
17,999 2021
8.6
C
662 CAROLINE
IMO 9262091
45,999 2002
8.6
C
663 TWIST
IMO 9422639
37,791 2006
8.6
C
664 FAIRCHEM KATANA
IMO 9749685
19,980 2016
8.6
C
665 WECO AMELIE
IMO 9693812
49,708 2015
8.7
C
666 BOW LEOPARD
IMO 9952165
26,004 2023
8.7
C
667 CLOTILDE
IMO 9448310
38,375 2008
8.7
C
668 VALDERICE
IMO 9587843
37,583 2011
8.7
C
669 PRABHU LAL
IMO 9416044
19,859 2008
8.7
C
670 KRITI CAPTAIN
IMO 9335147
37,434 2007
8.7
C
671 UACC RIYADH
IMO 9458834
45,444 2011
8.7
C
672 SOLAR SHERIDAN
IMO 9877652
25,039 2018
8.7
C
673 ULUC KA
IMO 9228801
37,272 2001
8.7
C
674 UACC MANSOURIA
IMO 9489089
45,293 2013
8.7
C
675 ATLAS STAR
IMO 9376828
38,289 2008
8.7
C
676 UOG ANDROS
IMO 9480162
45,562 2014
8.7
C
677 AQUA RAY
IMO 9973676
21,950 2023
8.7
C
678 STOLT VANGUARD
IMO 9274305
25,261 2004
8.7
C
679 RUI FU SHENG
IMO 9379129
46,846 2007
8.7
C
680 SAANA
IMO 9739836
17,999 2018
8.7
C
681 GOLD TRADER
IMO 9907005
33,293 2019
8.8
C
682 RAMELIA
IMO 9818280
17,994 2019
8.8
C
683 LOUIS P
IMO 9749336
25,161 2014
8.8
C
684 ANTIOCHIA KA
IMO 9311751
36,993 2006
8.8
C
685 FAIRCHEM PROTEA
IMO 9908346
19,959 2021
8.8
C
686 SUNRISE RAY
IMO 9829679
19,976 2018
8.8
C
687 AMBER RAY
IMO 9973664
21,945 2023
8.8
C
688 STOLT SINCERITY
IMO 9680085
38,850 2016
8.8
C
689 GINGA HAMMERHEAD
IMO 9829760
25,179 2019
8.8
C
690 TERN FORS
IMO 9909651
15,034 2022
8.8
C
691 EK-RIVER
IMO 9808259
19,884 2018
8.8
C
692 PEONIA
IMO 9313436
28,987 2005
8.8
C
693 MONAX
IMO 9311256
20,645 2005
8.8
C
694 STOLT BOBCAT
IMO 9511167
23,432 2009
8.8
C
695 CARIA KA
IMO 9327360
37,067 2006
8.8
C
696 FAIRCHEM LOYALTY
IMO 9791183
22,322 2019
8.9
C
697 MINERVA TYCHI
IMO 9723291
39,070 2016
8.9
C
698 LIBERA
IMO 9293973
40,102 2006
8.9
C
699 CHEM SCEPTRUM
IMO 9731793
27,130 2014
8.9
C
700 LIPARI M
IMO 9587817
37,583 2011
8.9
C
Page 14 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.