Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#290 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-45% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
253 TORM HERMIA
IMO 9797993
114,939 2018
2.8
A
252 ORINOCCO
IMO 9302994
150,296 2007
2.8
A
251 MILOS
IMO 9746619
157,525 2016
2.8
A
255 ECO OCEANO CA
IMO 9794020
157,285 2015
2.8
A
254 MINERVA ALEXANDRA
IMO 9892999
115,484 2021
2.8
A
259 YUAN HE WAN
IMO 9845996
113,642 2020
2.8
A
258 LOS ANGELES SPIRIT
IMO 9318072
159,233 2007
2.8
A
257 DELTA OCEAN
IMO 9408475
157,444 2010
2.8
A
256 NAVE DORADO
IMO 9993884
115,761 2022
2.8
A
260 MARAN SOLON
IMO 9881691
157,946 2019
2.8
A
262 MARLIN SARDINIA
IMO 9835862
156,607 2017
2.8
A
261 CAPTAIN LYRISTIS
IMO 9877183
158,081 2021
2.8
A
264 MELTEMI I
IMO 9298741
163,759 2006
2.8
A
263 EAGLE SAN DIEGO
IMO 9594834
157,849 2012
2.8
A
266 AEGEAN VISION
IMO 9645437
158,888 2015
2.8
A
265 FRONT SIENA
IMO 9832250
157,271 2019
2.8
A
269 MINERVA KALYPSO
IMO 9785225
159,055 2015
2.8
A
268 FRONT SINGAPORE
IMO 9832248
158,006 2017
2.8
A
267 SEA CORAL
IMO 9920708
157,105 2020
2.8
A
271 MARAN HELEN
IMO 9779381
156,458 2017
2.8
A
270 MONTE URQUIOLA
IMO 9803273
156,331 2019
2.8
A
272 EUROPE I
IMO 9905332
163,136 2022
2.8
A
274 EAGLE BARCELONA
IMO 9795048
113,400 2015
2.8
A
273 GH HOLIDAY
IMO 9761528
157,543 2016
2.8
A
276 KAPODISTRIAS 21
IMO 9886639
158,081 2021
2.8
A
275 SIKINOS I
IMO 9800269
157,007 2018
2.8
A
279 SEAWAYS RED
IMO 9596973
159,068 2010
2.8
A
281 CARINA VOYAGER
IMO 9897834
115,590 2021
2.8
A
278 EXPLORER
IMO 9312133
163,759 2006
2.8
A
282 SFL TRINITY
IMO 9799862
115,711 2017
2.8
A
277 TAMARA
IMO 9600889
157,016 2010
2.8
A
280 TAVISTOCK SQUARE
IMO 9784001
114,364 2015
2.8
A
283 ATLANTIC QUEEN
IMO 9899375
156,828 2021
2.8
A
285 UNIVERSAL PARTNER
IMO 9837614
299,981 2019
2.8
A
284 AEGEAN UNITY
IMO 9745237
158,932 2014
2.8
A
288 FRONT SAMARA
IMO 9845130
158,018 2017
2.9
A
287 DELTA EURYDICE
IMO 9700706
149,990 2015
2.9
A
289 BAKER SPIRIT
IMO 9408073
156,928 2009
2.9
A
286 AMALIA M
IMO 9924003
157,010 2020
2.9
A
290 ELISABETH MAERSK
IMO 9682980
158,277 2017
2.9
A
293 APOLYTARES
IMO 9419474
316,679 2006
2.9
A
292 RUNNER
IMO 9749518
158,594 2014
2.9
A
291 MARFA
IMO 9773478
159,513 2017
2.9
A
294 APACHE
IMO 9749489
158,594 2014
2.9
A
299 FRONT SHANGHAI
IMO 9832262
158,006 2017
2.9
A
298 NORDIC GALAXY
IMO 9742895
154,966 2016
2.9
A
297 JAG LAADKI
IMO 9461764
164,716 2010
2.9
A
296 STENA SUPERIOR
IMO 9579030
159,000 2011
2.9
A
295 FRONT CROWN
IMO 9759757
157,460 2016
2.9
A
300 SILVERWAY
IMO 9742912
157,781 2017
2.9
A
Page 6 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.