Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#630 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
10.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
-26% greener
B

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
601 ADAPEARL
IMO 9539432
12,440 2011
9.8
B
602 NORD LOTUS
IMO 9742390
16,963 2015
9.9
B
603 FLEVOBORG
IMO 9419292
14,603 2010
9.9
B
604 FIVELBORG
IMO 9419307
14,603 2010
9.9
B
605 DA DE
IMO 9608403
29,572 2014
9.9
B
606 ALPPILA
IMO 9381706
20,499 2011
9.9
B
608 PROGRESS IV
IMO 8358130
7,400 2006
9.9
B
607 MUZAFFER ANA
IMO 9554157
12,447 2010
9.9
B
609 BOHWA AMOY
IMO 9300958
10,084 2005
9.9
B
610 DA XIN
IMO 9608427
29,565 2014
10.0
B
612 ENVAR
IMO 9098696
4,705 2005
10.0
B
611 THAMESBORG
IMO 9546459
21,359 2013
10.0
B
613 PRINCESS MARIAM
IMO 9407005
7,004 2006
10.0
B
614 JOY LINE
IMO 9370094
14,376 2007
10.0
B
616 CHIPOLBROK SUN
IMO 9272230
30,435 2004
10.0
B
615 ARIF AMCA
IMO 9616084
11,086 2012
10.0
B
617 PADEREWSKI
IMO 9731389
31,673 2016
10.1
B
618 SUNDRY
IMO 9045651
7,321 2000
10.1
B
619 BSN VOYAGER
IMO 9021095
4,557 1991
10.1
B
620 ADNAN N
IMO 9334973
11,792 2006
10.1
B
621 VERACRUZ
IMO 9521849
19,596 2012
10.1
B
622 ASH BALTIC
IMO 9606493
13,121 2011
10.1
B
623 NOWOWIEJSKI
IMO 9710189
31,664 2016
10.1
B
625 ROYAL II
IMO 9355109
13,721 2007
10.2
B
624 SANTORINI
IMO 9181493
24,460 1998
10.2
B
627 PRINCE JOY
IMO 9644251
22,983 2012
10.2
B
626 SAADET
IMO 9522063
12,198 2009
10.2
B
628 SELECTA
IMO 9424807
14,030 2007
10.2
B
629 MATSUSHIRO
IMO 9477672
13,815 2009
10.2
B
631 FRASERBORG
IMO 9419319
14,603 2011
10.3
B
630 ANT
IMO 9412311
5,095 2006
10.3
B
632 KARANFIL
IMO 9369162
12,616 2008
10.3
B
633 FWN ADRIATIC
IMO 9970533
12,544 2025
10.3
B
635 WLADYSLAW ORKAN
IMO 9271925
30,435 2003
10.3
B
634 GLEN A
IMO 9015046
4,258 1990
10.3
B
636 TIBER RIVER
IMO 9650949
7,402 2014
10.3
B
638 YM EVEREST
IMO 9653812
16,717 2014
10.3
B
637 AKDENIZ S
IMO 9519377
9,161 2008
10.3
B
639 EXEBORG
IMO 9650482
11,950 2013
10.4
B
640 SEHER YAGCI
IMO 9556911
10,450 2009
10.4
B
641 LIDER HALIL
IMO 9462275
10,264 2020
10.4
B
642 BEGONIA
IMO 9445540
12,119 2007
10.4
B
643 SIVUMUT
IMO 9501253
12,747 2010
10.5
B
644 HELENE JULIE
IMO 9287314
13,988 2004
10.5
B
645 HOSEI PEARL
IMO 9543263
12,916 2009
10.5
B
646 ALEXIA I
IMO 9365049
10,887 2005
10.5
B
648 ALUNA
IMO 9590773
11,287 2011
10.5
B
647 VLIEBORG
IMO 9554781
11,902 2012
10.5
B
649 KUBROSLI Y
IMO 8000836
11,990 1981
10.5
B
650 VOLGABORG
IMO 9631072
11,902 2013
10.6
B
Page 13 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.