Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#351 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-44% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 556C 557D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 275 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
57
'27 Q2
37
'27 Q3
45
'27 Q4
71
'28 Q1
42
'28 Q2
35
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,874 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,757 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,381 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,195 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,194 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,194 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

411
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,668–3,970M
capex range, top measure per vessel (411 of 411 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.49 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
351 CRUDE LEVANTE
IMO 9899363
156,828 2021
2.9
A
354 TORM MATHILDE
IMO 9358412
109,672 2008
2.9
A
353 MARAN HERMIONE
IMO 9779379
157,755 2017
2.9
A
352 FRONT SPARTA
IMO 9847114
158,006 2019
2.9
A
358 SUNRISEWAY
IMO 9907665
158,307 2022
2.9
A
357 DELTA HELLAS
IMO 9406673
157,583 2009
2.9
A
356 MOSCOW SPIRIT
IMO 9418602
156,480 2010
2.9
A
355 FREUD
IMO 9804461
157,620 2018
2.9
A
360 MONTE SERANTES
IMO 9841615
156,584 2019
2.9
B
359 MARAN HOMER
IMO 9761372
156,458 2017
2.9
B
362 ACHILLEAS
IMO 9398072
297,416 2010
2.9
B
361 MONTESTENA
IMO 9585883
159,372 2012
2.9
B
363 SEABLISS
IMO 9587207
158,982 2012
2.9
B
365 THOMAS ZAFIRAS
IMO 9724087
113,691 2016
2.9
B
364 MONTREAL SPIRIT
IMO 9296389
149,997 2006
2.9
B
366 TORM HERMIA
IMO 9797993
114,939 2018
2.9
B
368 FRONT ULL
IMO 9600932
157,000 2010
2.9
B
367 AFRICA
IMO 9905320
163,220 2022
2.9
B
370 OTTOMAN NOBILITY
IMO 9290359
152,622 2005
2.9
B
369 SEAWAYS BRAZOS
IMO 9594731
158,537 2012
2.9
B
371 SHENLONG SPIRIT
IMO 9379210
159,021 2009
2.9
B
373 AFRODITI
IMO 9452880
166,164 2011
2.9
B
372 ITHAKI DF
IMO 9953494
114,598 2024
2.9
B
374 DELTA KANARIS
IMO 9429015
157,563 2010
2.9
B
375 DELTA MED
IMO 9412309
161,653 2010
2.9
B
382 SEAWAYS PECOS
IMO 9594743
158,464 2012
3.0
B
381 KRITI FUTURE
IMO 9924326
156,734 2022
3.0
B
380 OTTOMAN EQUITY
IMO 9404950
150,545 2008
3.0
B
379 DELTA HARMONY
IMO 9408463
157,410 2009
3.0
B
378 SABRINA GLORY
IMO 9959929
115,000 2024
3.0
B
377 SEAVIOLET
IMO 9790983
158,480 2018
3.0
B
376 DESIMI
IMO 9395305
296,865 2011
3.0
B
385 SEAWAYS COLORADO
IMO 9594767
158,614 2012
3.0
B
384 LR2 OLIVIA
IMO 9740469
109,985 2017
3.0
B
383 MARLIN LAGOS
IMO 9823584
114,853 2022
3.0
B
389 SIREN
IMO 9405423
158,583 2009
3.0
B
388 CHRISTINA
IMO 9772125
158,902 2016
3.0
B
387 BOUVARDIA
IMO 9935595
111,009 2022
3.0
B
386 PROSTAR
IMO 9833723
115,643 2019
3.0
B
393 SEAWAYS RIO GRANDE
IMO 9593438
159,056 2012
3.0
B
392 BORDEIRA
IMO 9529499
158,513 2013
3.0
B
394 AL BATEEN
IMO 9828376
114,637 2020
3.0
B
391 ASPEN SPIRIT
IMO 9427627
156,813 2009
3.0
B
390 DIMITRIOS
IMO 9900007
159,159 2021
3.0
B
398 OCEAN BLUE
IMO 9955997
113,385 2023
3.0
B
399 SEAHORSE 1
IMO 9956006
113,385 2024
3.0
B
397 SAPPHIRA
IMO 9336983
149,876 2008
3.0
B
396 KASOS
IMO 9800257
156,989 2018
3.0
B
395 SONANGOL HUILA
IMO 9575565
157,871 2010
3.0
B
400 MARLIN SHIKOKU
IMO 9841627
156,573 2019
3.0
B
Page 8 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.