Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,639 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
19.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
+275% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1601 STEN NORDIC
IMO 9351567
16,657 2005
15.7
E
1602 ATRIA
IMO 9492842
13,005 2010
15.7
E
1603 STEN PONTOS
IMO 9323584
16,427 2007
15.7
E
1604 CHALLAH
IMO 9933913
9,137 2022
15.7
E
1605 SAMBA
IMO 9310305
19,117 2005
16.0
E
1606 VULCANELLO M.
IMO 9337779
11,288 2006
16.1
E
1607 ASPHALT SPIRIT
IMO 9612557
14,484 2012
16.2
E
1608 DING HENG 23
IMO 9841421
9,013 2024
16.4
E
1609 ASTRAL
IMO 9371878
11,317 2006
16.5
E
1610 RUBIKON 78
IMO 9312078
16,642 2005
16.5
E
1611 PANAREA M
IMO 9329148
11,420 2006
16.5
E
1612 RUBIKON 202
IMO 9344423
16,979 2007
16.6
E
1613 PRIME
IMO 9267558
14,750 2004
16.7
E
1614 ARROW STAR 1
IMO 9435313
13,030 2007
16.7
E
1615 LACHIN
IMO 9821469
7,757 2020
16.7
E
1616 ASTINA
IMO 9320063
11,283 2006
16.8
E
1617 SONGA OPAL
IMO 9473913
17,588 2009
16.9
E
1618 CALAJUNCO M
IMO 9359571
21,600 2007
16.9
E
1619 BRO ANNA
IMO 9344435
16,867 2008
17.3
E
1620 MERENGUE
IMO 9309980
38,431 2007
17.4
E
1621 HAVVA ANA
IMO 9997385
8,817 2024
17.4
E
1622 LUMINA T
IMO 9312080
16,772 2006
17.6
E
1623 YELLOW TRADER
IMO 9292840
158,609 2004
17.8
E
1624 STELLA POLARIS
IMO 9187057
8,297 1999
17.9
E
1625 LETTIE PG
IMO 1018846
10,810 2025
17.9
E
1626 OASIS II
IMO 9167150
34,985 2000
18.4
E
1627 MOUNT OLYMPUS
IMO 9260081
40,011 2001
18.5
E
1628 XT PEACE
IMO 9980265
7,493 2023
18.6
E
1629 BLACK SHARK
IMO 9480655
8,476 2010
18.7
E
1630 MELIGUNIS M
IMO 9451214
11,258 2008
18.8
E
1631 SONGA SAPPHIRE
IMO 9444467
17,596 2008
18.8
E
1632 HEINRICH ESSBERGER
IMO 9939814
7,109 2024
18.9
E
1633 LISELOTTE ESSBERGER
IMO 9939785
7,134 2023
19.0
E
1634 3B DESTINY
IMO 9799446
7,645 2017
19.0
E
1635 DHAN LAXMI
IMO 9284788
50,353 2004
19.1
E
1636 SONGA PEARL
IMO 9444455
17,539 2008
19.1
E
1637 VEMAHONESTY
IMO 9448891
6,388 2009
19.2
E
1638 JOHN T. ESSBERGER
IMO 9939797
7,100 2023
19.3
E
1639 BAYRAKLI
IMO 9418391
3,799 2009
19.4
E
1640 BAUSTELLA
IMO 9812133
7,995 2018
19.5
E
1641 ROSE PG
IMO 9799032
7,420 2017
19.7
E
1642 IVER BITUMEN
IMO 9438949
6,482 2009
20.1
E
1643 IVER AMBASSADOR
IMO 9768514
7,673 2015
20.1
E
1644 IVER BEAUTY
IMO 9588263
6,175 2011
20.4
E
1645 POESTELLA
IMO 9803235
8,021 2017
20.7
E
1646 EVIE PG
IMO 9396359
9,990 2007
20.9
E
1647 SIRI KNUTSEN
IMO 9247168
37,494 2004
20.9
E
1648 ZHUANG YUAN AO
IMO 9650339
12,000 2012
21.4
E
1649 SHENG HUA WAN
IMO 9814416
7,641 2018
21.5
E
1650 LILSTELLA
IMO 9794771
7,944 2017
21.5
E
Page 33 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.