Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#854 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-22% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
851 WHISTLER SPIRIT
IMO 9417323
109,011 2006
4.0
C
852 EUROINTEGRITY
IMO 9410648
105,291 2009
4.0
C
853 ADVANTAGE START
IMO 9466570
156,644 2011
4.0
C
854 STI ELYSEES
IMO 9688829
109,999 2013
4.0
C
855 JAG LOKESH
IMO 9390599
105,599 2009
4.0
C
856 JATULI
IMO 9892444
112,459 2021
4.0
C
857 TONY
IMO 9432036
162,342 2010
4.0
C
858 STI MADISON
IMO 9688831
109,999 2013
4.0
C
859 TORM GWENDOLYN
IMO 9428982
119,456 2010
4.0
C
860 MARI BOYLE
IMO 9732979
49,999 2016
4.0
C
861 CLIO
IMO 9396660
112,705 2008
4.0
C
862 STI SOLIDARITY
IMO 9708576
109,999 2013
4.0
C
863 YASA GOLDEN DARDANELLES
IMO 9339985
110,828 2008
4.0
C
864 SEALOYALTY
IMO 9783928
108,610 2018
4.0
C
865 STI BROADWAY
IMO 9690846
109,999 2014
4.0
C
866 TORM GANGA
IMO 9461831
119,950 2010
4.0
C
867 AMAZON VIRTUE
IMO 9660360
72,412 2012
4.0
C
868 CAPRICORN SUN
IMO 9333785
115,577 2007
4.0
C
869 TORM SOVEREIGN
IMO 9797723
49,999 2015
4.0
C
870 LEONTIOS H
IMO 9724336
113,611 2016
4.0
C
871 AGISTRI
IMO 9597018
158,464 2012
4.0
C
872 SFL LION
IMO 9664770
115,162 2012
4.0
C
873 BELMAR
IMO 9516959
115,903 2008
4.0
C
874 CL FUGOU
IMO 9732931
50,000 2013
4.0
C
875 BAHRA
IMO 9595008
110,761 2012
4.0
C
876 DUBAI GREEN
IMO 9298674
74,999 2005
4.0
C
877 ALMI EXPLORER
IMO 9579547
157,787 2013
4.0
C
878 AL DASMA
IMO 9653446
109,719 2014
4.0
C
879 ASPEN
IMO 9818058
112,459 2019
4.0
C
880 STI VENETO
IMO 9690822
109,999 2013
4.0
C
881 FPMC P HERO
IMO 9457610
114,380 2006
4.0
C
882 JAG LEELA
IMO 9568184
105,525 2011
4.0
C
883 STI WINNIE
IMO 9696709
109,999 2015
4.0
C
884 STI GLADIATOR
IMO 9722170
109,999 2017
4.0
C
885 ADVANTAGE PORTOFINO
IMO 9794836
75,343 2018
4.1
C
886 HAIMA
IMO 9397896
104,991 2009
4.1
C
887 SAMURAI
IMO 9378876
149,993 2009
4.1
C
888 SFL PUMA
IMO 9664794
115,054 2012
4.1
C
889 FPMC P IDEAL
IMO 9459709
109,994 2006
4.1
C
890 SEAVELVET
IMO 9843211
111,964 2020
4.1
C
891 ALFA BALTICA
IMO 9696773
106,373 2015
4.1
C
892 ALQADISIA
IMO 9343352
115,577 2008
4.1
C
893 JAG AABHA
IMO 9388948
74,841 2008
4.1
C
894 STI STEADFAST
IMO 9719719
109,999 2013
4.1
C
895 HAIGUI
IMO 9505821
114,900 2013
4.1
C
896 OLYMPIC FLAG
IMO 9271341
155,009 2001
4.1
C
897 ADVANTAGE SOLAR
IMO 9408683
156,644 2009
4.1
C
898 SEAGUARDIAN
IMO 9891919
112,156 2021
4.1
C
899 KYRAKATINGO
IMO 9779965
113,563 2017
4.1
C
900 IONIC ASPIS
IMO 9523287
107,508 2011
4.1
C
Page 18 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.