Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,089 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
13.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+38% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 216 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q4
53
'27 Q1
41
'27 Q2
31
'27 Q3
43
'27 Q4
39
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
29
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,237 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,080 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,080 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 NORTHERN SPIRIT
IMO 9580962
19,118 2011
12.8
D
1052 THERESA GALAXY
IMO 9317195
19,988 2005
12.8
D
1053 FT QUARTO
IMO 9447330
18,000 2012
12.8
D
1054 SCOT BAYERN
IMO 9255828
8,234 2003
12.8
D
1055 CHEMICAL LUNA
IMO 9521423
14,304 2008
12.9
D
1056 HARBOUR EXPRESS
IMO 9418822
20,522 2011
12.9
D
1057 CHEM TAURUS
IMO 9477505
19,961 2010
12.9
D
1058 NQ MAGNOLIA
IMO 9384162
17,101 2007
12.9
D
1059 ELM GALAXY
IMO 9331256
20,854 2006
12.9
D
1060 ATLANTIC SPIRIT
IMO 9580974
19,131 2011
12.9
D
1061 ASP LILY
IMO 9542178
19,991 2011
13.0
D
1062 NQ MILLA
IMO 9261516
16,882 2003
13.1
D
1063 MAZU XIAO
IMO 9503940
7,739 2008
13.1
D
1064 LOEVSTAKKEN
IMO 9724441
19,995 2015
13.1
D
1065 ARKOS
IMO 9286827
13,700 2004
13.1
D
1066 PVT ESTELLA
IMO 9414321
13,102 2006
13.3
D
1067 ATLANTIC MATE
IMO 9350745
18,000 2007
13.3
D
1068 MISSISSIPPI STAR
IMO 9527623
13,054 2010
13.3
D
1069 AWH ALMA
IMO 9486166
17,055 2009
13.3
D
1070 GULHOLMEN
IMO 9435703
16,817 2007
13.3
D
1071 LINKEN
IMO 9733351
19,997 2016
13.3
D
1072 CHEMICAL FRONTIER
IMO 9940734
14,521 2022
13.4
D
1073 HARBOUR FASHION
IMO 9473080
16,878 2011
13.4
D
1074 CHEM HYDRA
IMO 9486180
17,055 2009
13.4
D
1075 THE AMIGO
IMO 9492309
14,911 2012
13.4
D
1076 TRANS FJORD
IMO 9956939
12,577 2023
13.4
D
1077 AQUARIUS
IMO 9393008
19,928 2008
13.4
D
1078 FMT GUMULDUR
IMO 9427976
14,368 2009
13.5
D
1079 VESTHOLMEN
IMO 9421295
17,525 2009
13.5
D
1080 HARBOUR PIONEER
IMO 9572757
19,122 2010
13.6
D
1081 ERIKA SCHULTE
IMO 9439864
16,427 2006
13.6
E
1082 CHEMICAL MASTER
IMO 9558957
14,298 2009
13.6
E
1083 FRANK
IMO 9371787
17,998 2008
13.6
E
1084 CHEM NORMA
IMO 9486192
17,095 2009
13.6
E
1085 HARBOUR PROGRESS
IMO 9572745
19,175 2010
13.6
E
1086 SLOMAN HERMES
IMO 9466738
16,418 2012
13.7
E
1087 EVA BERGEN
IMO 9800013
19,888 2018
13.7
E
1088 MTM SOUTHPORT
IMO 9416032
19,998 2008
13.7
E
1089 XT PROGRESS
IMO 9500144
17,427 2020
13.7
E
1090 YM SATURN
IMO 9362138
15,988 2007
13.7
E
1091 EL ZORRO
IMO 9344801
13,085 2006
13.7
E
1092 STOLT TEAL
IMO 9199323
8,587 1999
13.7
E
1093 ORIENTAL IXIA
IMO 9924728
16,298 2023
13.8
E
1094 CUMBRIAN
IMO 9298404
12,921 2004
13.8
E
1095 LUNNI
IMO 9797802
17,500 2018
13.8
E
1096 HEINRICH
IMO 9350757
17,998 2008
13.8
E
1097 GINGA SAKER
IMO 9258155
20,491 2003
13.8
E
1098 CHEMICAL EXPLORER
IMO 9820427
12,643 2018
13.9
E
1099 SILENDI
IMO 9508720
19,964 2009
13.9
E
1100 THEMSESTERN
IMO 9183843
21,870 2000
13.9
E
Page 22 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.