Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#807 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
9.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+0% higher
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
801 GINGA MERLIN
IMO 9254252
20,478 2002
9.9
C
802 CHEMICAL HUNTER
IMO 9758789
16,081 2015
9.9
C
803 GINGA CHEETAH
IMO 9414216
26,100 2007
9.9
C
804 STRINDA
IMO 9330771
19,959 2006
9.9
C
805 BOMAR OSPREY
IMO 9396024
25,431 2009
9.9
C
806 CYPRESS GALAXY
IMO 9379973
20,758 2007
9.9
C
807 LAVENDER RAY
IMO 9740794
19,994 2017
9.9
C
808 CHEM AMSTERDAM
IMO 9640138
19,801 2013
9.9
C
809 NAEBA GALAXY
IMO 9791169
26,196 2018
9.9
C
810 SOLAR NESRIN
IMO 9877626
25,039 2018
9.9
C
811 FAIRCHEM SWORD
IMO 9673678
19,993 2013
9.9
D
812 TEAL RAY
IMO 9838668
19,999 2019
10.0
D
813 MED PACIFIC
IMO 9461934
26,234 2012
10.0
D
814 WILLARD J
IMO 9749362
25,161 2014
10.0
D
815 ORCHID KEFALONIA
IMO 9363821
19,971 2008
10.0
D
816 BOMAR HAWK
IMO 9396000
25,385 2008
10.0
D
817 CB CARIBIC
IMO 9851713
37,822 2020
10.0
D
818 ORIENTAL JASMINE
IMO 9743760
16,064 2015
10.0
D
819 EASTERLY SYMPHONY
IMO 9464560
36,677 2009
10.0
D
820 CHEMICAL FIGHTER
IMO 9900459
15,950 2020
10.0
D
821 GINGA HAWK
IMO 9222651
19,998 2000
10.0
D
822 STOLT KIRI
IMO 9266231
19,508 2003
10.1
D
823 NORDIC MARI
IMO 9422677
19,355 2010
10.1
D
824 AQUARIUS
IMO 9354272
34,999 2007
10.1
D
825 G SILVER
IMO 9324215
19,887 2004
10.1
D
826 CHEM LITHIUM
IMO 9815252
19,981 2017
10.1
D
827 FAIRCHEM ROOIBOS
IMO 9920306
19,993 2022
10.1
D
828 ORIENTAL COSMOS
IMO 9800049
16,296 2019
10.1
D
829 PVT CLARA
IMO 9442548
20,831 2009
10.1
D
830 TERN OCEAN
IMO 9747986
14,827 2017
10.1
D
831 CHEM SINGAPORE
IMO 9705768
19,996 2015
10.1
D
832 SCARLET RAY
IMO 9799654
19,974 2020
10.1
D
833 VARI TRADER
IMO 9800025
19,808 2018
10.1
D
834 SWAN PACIFIC
IMO 9749805
19,997 2016
10.2
D
835 STOLT SPAN
IMO 9149524
22,273 1999
10.2
D
836 REBECCA SCHULTE
IMO 9576753
25,620 2011
10.2
D
837 WAN HE
IMO 9248461
24,404 2002
10.2
D
838 CHEMICAL CHALLENGER
IMO 9743758
16,111 2015
10.2
D
839 MAGNIFICA
IMO 9374234
40,248 2009
10.2
D
840 EASTERLY AS OMARIA
IMO 9363819
19,974 2007
10.2
D
841 RED OPAL
IMO 9381512
40,099 2005
10.2
D
842 PRABHU NAND
IMO 9425980
19,997 2008
10.3
D
843 MELATI 7
IMO 9172272
31,960 2000
10.3
D
844 CHEM MERCURY
IMO 9815276
19,971 2018
10.3
D
845 BOW CHAIN
IMO 9214317
37,518 2002
10.3
D
846 DAMSGAARD
IMO 9724453
19,998 2016
10.3
D
847 REINHOLD SCHULTE
IMO 9576789
25,583 2012
10.3
D
848 RICHMOND PARK
IMO 9624782
21,313 2012
10.3
D
849 NORDIC AMI
IMO 9800051
16,240 2019
10.3
D
850 PVT AZURA
IMO 9423683
19,945 2009
10.4
D
Page 17 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.