Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,711 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
15.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+47% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.4
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1701 CMA CGM SINNAMARY
IMO 9845673
2,200 TEU 2020
15.8
E
1702 AYDOGAN
IMO 9149897
1,726 TEU 1999
15.9
E
1703 CONTSHIP DAY
IMO 9509786
1,496 TEU 2010
15.9
E
1704 KARLA A
IMO 9297577
1,676 TEU 2003
15.9
E
1705 GERDA
IMO 9432232
1,425 TEU 2009
16.1
E
1706 MOLIVA
IMO 9454034
951 TEU 2014
16.1
E
1707 AS SELINA
IMO 9516789
1,740 TEU 2012
16.1
E
1708 TAMANRASSET
IMO 9760615
1,730 TEU 2017
16.1
E
1709 CMA CGM GULF EXPRESS
IMO 9239874
1,679 TEU 2002
16.2
E
1710 OOCL RAUMA
IMO 9462794
1,425 TEU 2009
16.2
E
1711 MSC MARYLENA II
IMO 9169031
1,658 TEU 1998
16.3
E
1712 RMS MEL
IMO 9387607
698 TEU 2008
16.3
E
1713 WARNOW MASTER
IMO 9449833
1,496 TEU 2006
16.4
E
1714 AS FABIANA
IMO 9395109
1,284 TEU 2007
16.4
E
1715 SC MEDFORD
IMO 9275103
1,200 TEU 2004
16.4
E
1716 CMA CGM KAILAS
IMO 9339545
1,860 TEU 2006
16.4
E
1717 ATLANTIC NORTH
IMO 9236597
1,129 TEU 2002
16.4
E
1718 THETIS D
IMO 9372274
1,425 TEU 2009
16.4
E
1719 RACHEL BORCHARD
IMO 9212010
1,216 TEU 2000
16.5
E
1720 HEINRICH EHLER
IMO 9372200
1,425 TEU 2008
16.5
E
1721 MSC ESHA F
IMO 9004231
923 TEU 1993
16.5
E
1722 MSC MIA SUMMER II
IMO 9169067
1,658 TEU 1999
16.5
E
1723 BG RED
IMO 9976965
1,400 TEU 2024
16.6
E
1724 CMA CGM BLOSSOM
IMO 9962524
1,096 TEU 2023
16.6
E
1725 CMA CGM KOUROU
IMO 9845659
2,200 TEU 2020
16.6
E
1726 DHANU
IMO 9122473
1,730 TEU 2001
16.7
E
1727 MEDKON MERSIN
IMO 9430040
704 TEU 2008
16.7
E
1728 MSC HOGGAR
IMO 9286449
858 TEU 2004
16.8
E
1729 WEC JAN STEEN
IMO 9354416
868 TEU 2007
16.9
E
1730 RMS TEAM
IMO 9282170
1,076 TEU 2004
16.9
E
1731 HALSTED
IMO 9337262
2,824 TEU 2007
16.9
E
1732 JAN
IMO 9477335
1,350 TEU 2009
16.9
E
1733 MARBURG
IMO 9387592
880 TEU 2009
16.9
E
1734 MSC ELKE F
IMO 9318773
830 TEU 2005
17.0
E
1735 BURAK BAYRAKTAR
IMO 9260536
858 TEU 2002
17.0
E
1736 CONTSHIP JET
IMO 9348625
1,267 TEU 2007
17.1
E
1737 MICHIGAN
IMO 9437139
1,284 TEU 2008
17.1
E
1738 FIONA
IMO 9149885
1,698 TEU 1998
17.1
E
1739 ALEXANDER B
IMO 9328649
1,200 TEU 2006
17.1
E
1740 ALANA
IMO 9297589
862 TEU 2004
17.1
E
1741 BALTIC SHARK
IMO 9315032
868 TEU 2004
17.4
E
1742 ATLANTIC WEST
IMO 9396610
1,350 TEU 2008
17.4
E
1743 MSC ROMINA II
IMO 9449821
1,496 TEU 2009
17.4
E
1744 JONATHAN P
IMO 9357872
1,732 TEU 2006
17.4
E
1745 UNI-PHOENIX
IMO 9202170
1,206 TEU 1998
17.5
E
1746 MSC ORTOLAN II
IMO 9401685
1,740 TEU 2009
17.5
E
1747 BALLATA
IMO 9327578
1,100 TEU 2006
17.5
E
1748 YM INVENTIVE
IMO 9319105
1,805 TEU 2007
17.5
E
1749 MSC EDITH II
IMO 9169029
1,658 TEU 1998
17.6
E
1750 ELBWATER
IMO 9504073
1,036 TEU 2012
17.6
E
Page 35 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.