Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,344 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
15.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
+8% higher
C

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1301 RIX ATLANTIC
IMO 9194270
4,150 1999
14.9
C
1302 BRIGITTE F
IMO 8504234
3,070 1985
14.9
C
1303 HUDSONGRACHT
IMO 9433262
12,672 2008
14.9
C
1304 SNOEKGRACHT
IMO 9202546
21,311 2000
14.9
C
1305 RAMA H
IMO 8105404
8,214 1982
14.9
C
1306 ALICE
IMO 9677399
5,098 2013
14.9
C
1307 WES ELISA
IMO 9953975
3,801 2023
14.9
C
1308 NICOLE
IMO 9454814
6,684 2009
14.9
C
1309 MUNTGRACHT
IMO 9571545
11,677 2012
14.9
C
1310 ANNIKA BRAREN
IMO 9849148
5,023 2020
15.0
C
1311 EDMY
IMO 9263540
7,894 2002
15.0
C
1312 BELLIS
IMO 9381952
6,804 2007
15.0
C
1313 KAIRE
IMO 9454802
6,684 2008
15.0
C
1314 HOUTMANGRACHT
IMO 9435765
12,635 2009
15.0
C
1315 TUNA
IMO 9306691
4,775 2004
15.0
C
1316 ONEGO OTRA
IMO 9535606
10,872 2010
15.0
C
1317 STEVIE
IMO 9488035
12,767 2010
15.0
C
1318 BBC ALBERTA
IMO 9468102
12,669 2010
15.0
C
1319 LONGVIND
IMO 9547336
6,132 2011
15.0
C
1320 SVEALAND
IMO 9195743
3,783 2001
15.0
C
1321 DINTELDIJK
IMO 9346677
4,891 2007
15.0
C
1322 RIX STREAM
IMO 9111125
2,689 1994
15.0
C
1323 FLEVOGRACHT
IMO 9509956
12,086 2011
15.0
C
1324 ELECTRAMAR
IMO 9951824
5,424 2023
15.0
C
1325 SEA PROSPECT
IMO 9516143
9,735 2012
15.0
C
1326 MARGARETHA
IMO 9240548
10,526 2002
15.0
C
1327 WILSON PORI
IMO 9201839
4,966 1999
15.0
C
1328 ANNA
IMO 9361110
5,097 2008
15.1
C
1329 SILVER LION
IMO 9281487
6,315 2005
15.1
C
1330 OCEAN TRANGA
IMO 9532812
8,250 2011
15.1
C
1331 KLEER
IMO 9393840
5,907 2008
15.1
C
1332 ANNA
IMO 9566796
7,712 2011
15.1
C
1333 M/V MANISA SOLE
IMO 9306304
8,211 2006
15.1
C
1334 ALMA
IMO 9969429
3,641 2024
15.1
C
1335 SPANACO LOYALTY
IMO 9373503
5,000 2007
15.1
C
1336 SCHOUWENBANK
IMO 9361732
4,995 2007
15.1
C
1337 HIKMET KARABEKIR
IMO 9421087
8,113 2008
15.1
C
1338 WOLF
IMO 9306407
8,120 2006
15.1
C
1339 JAMTLAND
IMO 9277319
7,755 2003
15.1
C
1340 FL STOROE
IMO 9268851
6,011 2005
15.1
C
1341 AMELAND
IMO 9508794
8,398 2009
15.1
C
1342 WILSON HERON
IMO 9116022
4,228 1994
15.1
C
1343 MARIETJE NORA
IMO 9481609
9,068 2015
15.1
C
1344 KRIS
IMO 9408889
8,678 2007
15.1
C
1345 FRIEDHELM
IMO 9953951
3,803 2023
15.1
C
1346 MARIETJE MARSILLA
IMO 9458248
8,493 2010
15.1
C
1347 MEIKE
IMO 9105841
4,143 1994
15.1
C
1348 WILSON NEWCASTLE
IMO 9431006
8,701 2011
15.1
C
1349 FLUVIUS OTTER
IMO 9117961
3,280 1996
15.1
C
1350 MAMMAD AMIN RESULZADEH
IMO 9175157
6,623 1998
15.1
C
Page 27 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.