Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,836 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-2% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1801 BBG MASTER
IMO 9721982
63,650 2016
4.5
C
1802 HAWK S
IMO 1082782
40,576 2025
4.5
C
1803 VIRGO STELLAR
IMO 9384540
58,663 2008
4.5
C
1804 ELLIREA
IMO 9757008
60,263 2017
4.5
C
1805 BUBBA BOOSH
IMO 9674218
55,464 2014
4.5
C
1806 FEDERAL TIBER
IMO 9644483
55,160 2013
4.5
C
1807 XIN HAI TONG 38
IMO 9622784
56,635 2011
4.5
C
1808 SEABONI
IMO 9688647
62,657 2015
4.5
C
1809 MALAK
IMO 9446702
56,942 2010
4.5
C
1810 TAI HOMAGE
IMO 1014931
39,983 2022
4.5
C
1811 PMS SEAGULL
IMO 9614971
61,358 2012
4.5
C
1812 ARIS T
IMO 9343895
92,524 2007
4.5
C
1813 SUN PLENTY
IMO 9423554
58,729 2009
4.5
C
1814 AL MAQAM
IMO 9672040
63,155 2014
4.5
C
1815 CAPE KOURION
IMO 9481441
79,463 2006
4.5
C
1816 JNS FRIENDSHIP
IMO 1061520
40,537 2024
4.5
C
1817 FEDERAL TRIDENT
IMO 9658977
55,178 2016
4.5
C
1818 GUARDIAN
IMO 9714692
61,202 2013
4.6
C
1819 SHENG HENG HAI
IMO 9505493
56,649 2013
4.6
C
1820 AZUL
IMO 9726504
63,253 2014
4.6
C
1821 STEEL C
IMO 9700330
63,118 2015
4.6
C
1822 THOR CALIBER
IMO 9440928
58,732 2008
4.6
C
1823 YASA BEGONIA
IMO 9991654
40,541 2025
4.6
C
1824 GREAT VISION
IMO 9728681
63,376 2016
4.6
C
1825 MUSALA
IMO 9937294
32,223 2023
4.6
C
1826 SHARP ISLAND
IMO 9748370
61,244 2016
4.6
C
1827 W-SAPPHIRE
IMO 9605645
81,681 2012
4.6
C
1828 COOPER ISLAND
IMO 9668910
57,905 2014
4.6
C
1829 NEW EXCELLENCE
IMO 9502594
79,449 2014
4.6
C
1830 KANG HONG
IMO 9323558
55,589 2005
4.6
C
1831 IONIAN CHALLENGER
IMO 9461350
82,245 2010
4.6
C
1832 XIN HAI TONG 802
IMO 9603972
81,610 2012
4.6
C
1833 LEMESSOS NAPA
IMO 9741293
77,998 2014
4.6
C
1834 RED FIN
IMO 9607306
56,780 2011
4.6
C
1835 FEDERAL TAKASE
IMO 9658989
55,178 2011
4.6
C
1836 XIN AN YUAN
IMO 9407873
55,277 2009
4.6
C
1837 ANNA SMILE
IMO 9280770
74,823 2004
4.6
C
1838 VELA PRIME
IMO 9218272
73,105 2001
4.6
C
1839 SKYWALKER
IMO 9724740
63,350 2015
4.6
C
1840 NORSE OMISHIMA
IMO 9990674
40,006 2025
4.6
C
1841 OAK BAY
IMO 9652557
55,845 2013
4.6
C
1842 BROAD GLORY
IMO 9324643
52,415 2006
4.6
C
1843 STARRY NIGHT
IMO 9928035
61,222 2022
4.6
C
1844 KN FOREST
IMO 9558268
58,037 2013
4.6
C
1845 HERCULES
IMO 9642382
75,200 2013
4.6
C
1846 EVANGELISTRIA
IMO 9383857
75,750 2008
4.6
C
1847 BULK ANTIGUA
IMO 9839818
61,602 2015
4.6
C
1848 WARRIOR
IMO 1014838
40,053 2024
4.6
C
1849 LEON
IMO 9303871
55,730 2006
4.6
C
1850 STAR WAVE
IMO 9746009
61,491 2017
4.6
C
Page 37 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.