Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#3,379 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
8.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
+82% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3351 MARIA H
IMO 9571650
34,938 2013
8.2
E
3352 MIRO G
IMO 9589712
28,207 2011
8.2
E
3353 NESREENA EMPRESS
IMO 9475727
33,078 2010
8.2
E
3354 RESKO
IMO 9393462
30,372 2010
8.2
E
3355 ALKADI BEY
IMO 9085675
21,964 1995
8.3
E
3356 COMMANDER K
IMO 9650494
35,207 2012
8.3
E
3357 TAO STAR
IMO 9487562
25,064 2010
8.3
E
3358 BELTNES
IMO 9432206
33,173 2009
8.3
E
3359 AMAPOLA
IMO 9588342
35,037 2011
8.3
E
3360 ATLANTIC OCEAN
IMO 9467598
36,009 2010
8.3
E
3361 JUNO
IMO 9422378
30,185 2011
8.3
E
3362 GOLDEN STAR
IMO 9257981
29,837 2002
8.3
E
3363 SUNDA
IMO 9498236
30,691 2010
8.3
E
3364 NOELLE G
IMO 9459967
30,877 2011
8.4
E
3365 LILA INCHEON
IMO 9571272
32,401 2010
8.4
E
3366 SAINT VASSILIOS
IMO 9486403
33,889 2007
8.4
E
3367 ADNAN TORLAK
IMO 9243253
18,712 2001
8.4
E
3368 CELINA
IMO 9119074
24,325 1995
8.5
E
3369 AP KUPARI
IMO 9489168
34,373 2010
8.5
E
3370 AVELLANEDA
IMO 9571636
34,938 2013
8.5
E
3371 HAROUN BEY
IMO 9082609
26,300 1995
8.5
E
3372 ATALANTE
IMO 9363168
23,641 2008
8.5
E
3373 RUBATO
IMO 9487550
25,159 2010
8.5
E
3374 CECELA S
IMO 9227857
19,225 2000
8.5
E
3375 SANTAMARIA
IMO 9571612
34,938 2013
8.5
E
3376 AGIOI THEODOROI
IMO 9515527
28,338 2009
8.5
E
3377 FN OCEAN
IMO 9567441
56,556 2011
8.6
E
3378 HADEEL
IMO 9406087
30,420 2010
8.6
E
3379 CSL THAMES
IMO 9440447
29,827 2006
8.6
E
3380 SIGMA PIONEER
IMO 9543249
31,800 2011
8.6
E
3381 EIRINI S
IMO 9595369
34,039 2012
8.6
E
3382 S NEPTUNE
IMO 9634892
29,037 2012
8.6
E
3383 STAMFORD PIONEER
IMO 9636943
32,211 2012
8.7
E
3384 CHESTNUT
IMO 9477866
30,810 2010
8.7
E
3385 WHITE IVY
IMO 9370393
16,383 2008
8.7
E
3386 SUPRA
IMO 9397200
16,648 2006
8.7
E
3387 PRIDE
IMO 9480277
16,987 2008
8.7
E
3388 CAPTAIN RABIE
IMO 9172387
35,366 1999
8.7
E
3389 A LINE
IMO 9246920
12,259 2001
8.7
E
3390 PETREL S
IMO 9363883
19,100 2006
8.7
E
3391 LUBIE
IMO 9441984
30,210 2011
8.7
E
3392 GREENTEC
IMO 9493509
33,035 2008
8.8
E
3393 VITOSHA
IMO 9564138
30,693 2010
8.8
E
3394 SANDNES
IMO 9306029
27,711 2005
8.8
E
3395 NEW COMMANDER
IMO 9610652
37,187 2012
8.8
E
3396 KALLIOPI S
IMO 9450844
34,402 2012
8.8
E
3397 YU LONG LING
IMO 9505431
32,005 2011
8.8
E
3398 ANGELS SPIRIT
IMO 9502740
35,239 2009
8.8
E
3399 MUZAFFER ESENER
IMO 9381861
21,211 2007
8.8
E
3400 MOHAC
IMO 9251042
15,503 2001
8.8
E
Page 68 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.