Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#3,013 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
6.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+36% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 630 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

121
Q4
138
'27 Q1
84
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
137
'27 Q4
132
'28 Q1
97
'28 Q2
111
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,728 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,124
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,918–11,738M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,124 of 1,124 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3001 PORT ALICE
IMO 9311402
33,505 2005
6.6
E
3002 ATLANTIS DISCOVERY
IMO 9544736
36,781 2010
6.6
E
3003 REK GRACE
IMO 9445203
28,342 2008
6.6
E
3004 SF CHALISA
IMO 9502726
35,283 2009
6.6
E
3005 UBC TACOMA
IMO 9737888
37,332 2018
6.6
E
3006 WU YI HAI
IMO 9488217
53,393 2008
6.6
E
3007 ORIENT PROGRESS
IMO 9450777
34,393 2007
6.6
E
3008 ORIENT PACE
IMO 9450753
34,390 2007
6.6
E
3009 ISABELLE G
IMO 9285938
37,193 2004
6.6
E
3010 LUDOGORETS
IMO 9415155
29,998 2010
6.6
E
3011 BC GRACE
IMO 9561887
29,637 2011
6.6
E
3012 LAGO DI LEDRO
IMO 9471654
37,390 2012
6.6
E
3013 ADELINA
IMO 9595785
35,072 2010
6.6
E
3014 MJ PINAR
IMO 9406051
30,465 2009
6.6
E
3015 ASTRO ORION
IMO 9767326
37,388 2017
6.6
E
3016 PURE MERCY
IMO 9277474
32,759 2005
6.6
E
3017 C TIGER
IMO 9583706
35,693 2011
6.6
E
3018 TOMKAR
IMO 9180372
34,948 1999
6.6
E
3019 ALIKI FORCE
IMO 9498559
58,419 2011
6.7
E
3020 OSMAN BEY
IMO 9111357
27,321 1995
6.7
E
3021 LILA
IMO 9278923
28,678 2003
6.7
E
3022 LADY LITEL
IMO 9571428
33,789 2013
6.7
E
3023 BLISS
IMO 9370331
35,278 2007
6.7
E
3024 ELISAR
IMO 9595747
36,817 2011
6.7
E
3025 MARINA L
IMO 9675705
28,384 2014
6.7
E
3026 LOWLANDS SHARK
IMO 9674787
36,309 2015
6.7
E
3027 KEN BREEZE
IMO 9636383
37,076 2010
6.7
E
3028 POLESIE
IMO 9488097
38,056 2009
6.7
E
3029 BUNUN WISDOM
IMO 9628568
38,168 2012
6.7
E
3030 FEDERAL KIBUNE
IMO 9606053
36,824 2010
6.7
E
3031 ES CARE
IMO 9708930
35,510 2015
6.7
E
3032 AVELLANEDA
IMO 9571636
34,938 2013
6.7
E
3033 NANA LEEN
IMO 9113850
28,300 1995
6.7
E
3034 PREDATOR
IMO 9641792
28,348 2013
6.7
E
3035 STRANDJA
IMO 9564140
30,683 2010
6.7
E
3036 GLADIATOR
IMO 9445033
28,341 2008
6.7
E
3037 SOFIA R
IMO 9530967
36,093 2012
6.7
E
3038 MAPLE AMBITION
IMO 9760354
35,513 2015
6.7
E
3039 KOSZALIN
IMO 9594236
37,930 2012
6.7
E
3040 ARGO B
IMO 9459371
35,314 2010
6.7
E
3041 TSL ROSEMARY
IMO 9527192
33,191 2012
6.7
E
3042 JALMA TOPIC
IMO 9309655
51,966 2006
6.7
E
3043 GAT FATHER
IMO 9764013
35,737 2016
6.7
E
3044 FEDERAL NAKAGAWA
IMO 9278791
36,489 2005
6.7
E
3045 LOWLANDS CORSO
IMO 9959450
40,040 2023
6.7
E
3046 YANNIS GORGIAS
IMO 9423293
87,375 2010
6.7
E
3047 HELENA G
IMO 9358383
37,251 2007
6.7
E
3048 CLEANTEC
IMO 9473418
33,344 2009
6.7
E
3049 YALOUSSA
IMO 9464546
28,361 2008
6.7
E
3050 FEDERICA
IMO 9612313
36,781 2012
6.7
E
Page 61 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.