Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,365 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
7.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
+37% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1351 EAGLE BARENTS
IMO 9676125
119,690 2015
7.0
E
1352 LOULOULIGHT
IMO 9594901
74,986 2013
7.0
E
1353 ILAN
IMO 9282510
46,874 2004
7.0
E
1354 ALPINE LINK
IMO 9478614
50,208 2006
7.0
E
1355 HARDRADA
IMO 9344007
45,983 2007
7.0
E
1356 KAREN MAERSK
IMO 9423712
39,708 2010
7.0
E
1357 BALOS
IMO 9323560
40,165 2008
7.0
E
1358 OM SINGAPORE
IMO 9341433
29,015 2007
7.0
E
1359 HISTRIA GEMMA
IMO 9436719
40,404 2010
7.0
E
1360 STAR C
IMO 9411135
37,836 2009
7.0
E
1361 TWINKLE STAR
IMO 9363780
45,750 2006
7.0
E
1362 STAMOS
IMO 9592276
115,498 2010
7.1
E
1363 MERSINI
IMO 9405899
51,753 2009
7.1
E
1364 WHITE PEARL
IMO 9917957
36,754 2021
7.1
E
1365 IOANNIS ZAFIRAKIS
IMO 9890587
49,999 2021
7.1
E
1366 SEAFRONTIER
IMO 9457268
48,580 2011
7.1
E
1367 HISTRIA AGATA
IMO 9357559
40,440 2007
7.2
E
1368 OCEAN VENTURE
IMO 9660657
49,995 2014
7.2
E
1369 T.SUNA
IMO 9652911
51,532 2012
7.2
E
1370 POLKA
IMO 9422641
37,759 2006
7.3
E
1371 HISTRIA TIGER
IMO 9396335
40,420 2008
7.3
E
1372 DARIKA
IMO 9506693
51,063 2011
7.3
E
1373 TORILL KNUTSEN
IMO 9630030
123,166 2013
7.3
E
1374 CLEAN NIRVANA
IMO 9308168
50,359 2008
7.3
E
1375 JAG PRERANA
IMO 9321952
47,824 2007
7.3
E
1376 ZEAL START
IMO 9379064
41,369 2006
7.3
E
1377 STI POPLAR
IMO 9696589
38,734 2014
7.4
E
1378 SAPSAN
IMO 9311713
47,496 2005
7.4
E
1379 CHEM GUARD
IMO 9261762
34,551 2002
7.4
E
1380 ROSE I
IMO 9376945
37,900 2007
7.4
E
1381 PINE MEADOW
IMO 9478688
50,171 2006
7.4
E
1382 CHAMPION POMER
IMO 9455739
52,579 2011
7.4
E
1383 KIRSTEN MAERSK
IMO 9431264
39,729 2010
7.4
E
1384 P. BEVERLY HILLS
IMO 9794068
157,285 2019
7.4
E
1385 HISTRIA CORAL
IMO 9301299
39,999 2006
7.4
E
1386 ORFEAS
IMO 9358917
73,730 2008
7.4
E
1387 JOYCE
IMO 9338814
47,344 2007
7.4
E
1388 CHAMPION ENDURANCE
IMO 9288813
46,803 2005
7.5
E
1389 SIRTAKI
IMO 9369887
51,442 2009
7.5
E
1390 VS LISBETH
IMO 9309978
38,492 2006
7.5
E
1391 CECH
IMO 9617442
42,150 2011
7.5
E
1392 HISTRIA GIADA
IMO 9396323
40,448 2007
7.6
E
1393 VS SPIRIT
IMO 9339636
34,671 2007
7.6
E
1394 VALVERDE
IMO 9391490
50,633 2008
7.6
E
1395 MAERSK KATE
IMO 9431276
39,755 2006
7.6
E
1396 MINERVA ANTONIA
IMO 9380398
46,923 2008
7.7
E
1397 STI PIMLICO
IMO 9686871
38,734 2014
7.7
E
1398 MAERSK ADRIATIC
IMO 9636632
37,538 2012
7.7
E
1399 VS LEIA
IMO 9303730
38,461 2006
7.7
E
1400 RICH HARVEST
IMO 9908982
50,446 2021
7.7
E
Page 28 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.