Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#597 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
9.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-30% greener
B

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 223 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

45
Q4
39
'27 Q1
40
'27 Q2
34
'27 Q3
32
'27 Q4
30
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
28
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 648 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
551 SIDER LION
IMO 9486269
25,467 2010
9.1
B
550 HALIT BEY
IMO 9511375
12,046 2008
9.1
B
553 BSN VOYAGER
IMO 9021095
5,015 1991
9.2
B
554 ATLANTA
IMO 9513373
12,223 2009
9.2
B
555 CHIPOLBROK GALAXY
IMO 9432141
30,330 2010
9.2
B
556 LEOPOLD STAFF
IMO 9272228
30,469 2004
9.2
B
557 BEATRIX
IMO 9419280
14,603 2009
9.2
B
558 XIA MEN ZE SHUN
IMO 9695107
27,263 2014
9.2
B
561 LAKE ST. CLAIR
IMO 9315549
27,740 2005
9.3
B
560 ASH ADRIATIC
IMO 9614830
11,396 2012
9.3
B
559 MATTEO BR
IMO 9556844
25,000 2010
9.3
B
562 MAXIMUS-1
IMO 9344734
10,632 2005
9.3
B
563 AAL PUSAN
IMO 9498389
32,279 2012
9.3
B
565 ADAVEGA
IMO 9539339
12,427 2010
9.3
B
564 VERTOM CYTA
IMO 9938731
7,281 2023
9.3
B
566 FISHER
IMO 9177791
12,974 1999
9.3
B
567 EGBERT WAGENBORG
IMO 9802695
14,327 2017
9.3
B
568 MARIA FRANCISCA
IMO 9235361
30,320 2004
9.3
B
570 ARKLOW WIND
IMO 9818943
16,861 2019
9.4
B
569 VERTOM ANETTE
IMO 9972763
7,292 2024
9.4
B
572 ARKLOW WOOD
IMO 9818967
16,861 2020
9.4
B
571 SIENNA
IMO 9353022
8,163 2005
9.4
B
573 ORUBA
IMO 9430624
10,611 2007
9.4
B
574 ADAROSE
IMO 9392107
12,497 2009
9.4
B
575 MARIA JOSE
IMO 9593672
24,964 2011
9.5
B
576 MISJE ROSE
IMO 9967548
5,310 2024
9.5
B
577 ULTRA KUROSHIO
IMO 1057543
13,796 2025
9.5
B
578 VERTOM LISA
IMO 9972775
7,280 2023
9.5
B
579 MUHARREM DADAYLI
IMO 9558581
13,449 2010
9.5
B
580 BLUE CAPRAMAR
IMO 9641845
7,799 2012
9.5
B
581 PEACE
IMO 9553983
16,817 2012
9.5
B
582 LAKE ONTARIO
IMO 9283538
27,783 2004
9.6
B
583 SIRUS SKY
IMO 9648738
7,807 2012
9.6
B
584 ZI JING SONG
IMO 9608910
27,403 2012
9.6
B
585 SANDSTAD
IMO 1028956
8,583 2025
9.6
B
586 OBIRIX
IMO 9504267
9,848 2008
9.6
B
587 JADE I
IMO 9162411
25,012 1998
9.6
B
588 WESER STAHL
IMO 9186687
47,257 1999
9.6
B
589 LADY AYSE
IMO 9227871
16,239 2001
9.7
B
590 FINNBORG
IMO 9419321
14,614 2011
9.7
B
591 WO LONG SONG
IMO 9416783
27,000 2010
9.7
B
592 MOHAMAD Y
IMO 8107000
11,990 1982
9.7
B
593 PATAGONMAN
IMO 9521851
18,858 2012
9.7
B
594 ICDAS-5
IMO 9829916
15,621 2019
9.7
B
595 HOPTERIX
IMO 9645841
8,813 2012
9.8
B
596 MIKAWA
IMO 9354208
14,078 2006
9.8
B
598 LADY ESMA
IMO 9402110
31,612 2009
9.8
B
597 ARKLOW WILLOW
IMO 9818955
16,861 2019
9.8
B
599 TRINITYBORG
IMO 9546485
21,277 2013
9.8
B
600 ARAGONBORG
IMO 9466312
17,294 2010
9.8
B
Page 12 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.