Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#747 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-10% greener
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
701 ZEVULUN
IMO 9405540
51,522 2010
8.1
C
702 WAN CHENG
IMO 9234587
46,764 2002
8.2
C
703 HUANG SHAN 16
IMO 9967940
19,885 2023
8.2
C
704 BOCHEM BRISBANE
IMO 9973315
26,564 2021
8.2
C
705 BOW TITANIUM
IMO 9777395
27,601 2018
8.2
C
706 STENA CONVOY
IMO 9543110
49,999 2022
8.2
C
707 FUTURA
IMO 9293961
40,085 2006
8.2
C
708 NAVIG8 UNIVERSE
IMO 9489106
45,313 2013
8.2
C
709 STOLT ISLAND
IMO 9414058
43,593 2009
8.2
C
710 VALDARNO
IMO 9717503
39,208 2015
8.2
C
711 SFL ARUBA
IMO 9919761
33,325 2022
8.2
C
712 STOLT MAPLE
IMO 9764491
32,825 2017
8.2
C
713 CIELO DI GAETA
IMO 9669653
39,990 2014
8.2
C
714 OTTO H
IMO 9749374
25,161 2014
8.2
C
715 STOLT VANGUARD
IMO 9274305
25,261 2004
8.2
C
716 CONTI GREENLAND
IMO 9391397
37,599 2008
8.2
C
717 MAC LONDON
IMO 9296872
19,999 2003
8.2
C
718 ATLAS
IMO 9538177
37,866 2014
8.3
C
719 THUN VENERN
IMO 9739824
17,999 2018
8.3
C
720 ESTEEM SANGO
IMO 9900461
19,980 2015
8.3
C
721 RED DIAMOND
IMO 9583665
51,034 2012
8.3
C
722 PRAGUE
IMO 9421324
49,999 2008
8.3
C
723 LYCIA KA
IMO 9327384
37,091 2006
8.3
C
724 STOLT VIRTUE
IMO 9274317
25,230 2004
8.3
C
725 FAIRCHEM VALOR
IMO 9791195
22,292 2019
8.3
C
726 EASTERLY LIME GALAXY
IMO 9380972
19,992 2008
8.3
C
727 BOW CAROLINE
IMO 9367554
33,609 2009
8.3
C
728 CB BALTIC
IMO 9851701
37,874 2020
8.3
C
729 CHERRY TONDA
IMO 9288942
39,999 2004
8.3
C
730 RED OPAL
IMO 9381512
40,099 2005
8.3
C
731 CHEM STAR 1
IMO 9731731
27,125 2014
8.3
C
732 BOW ARCHITECT
IMO 9319480
30,058 2005
8.3
C
733 ARGOLIS
IMO 9326524
40,083 2007
8.3
C
734 CB ADRIATIC
IMO 9851696
37,836 2019
8.3
C
735 SEA LA BELLE
IMO 9380374
49,995 2008
8.3
C
736 GELIBOLU
IMO 9314832
37,311 2006
8.4
C
737 GINGA ANGEL
IMO 9809394
25,245 2020
8.4
C
738 CHEMROAD SEA
IMO 9565730
33,560 2011
8.4
C
739 FENICUSA M
IMO 9381500
40,037 2008
8.4
C
740 NORDIC CALLAO
IMO 9796822
26,029 2019
8.4
C
741 CB CARIBIC
IMO 9851713
37,822 2020
8.4
C
742 EK-RIVER
IMO 9808259
19,884 2018
8.4
C
743 SUPER G
IMO 9418121
50,747 2010
8.4
C
744 SAGAMI
IMO 9379911
33,614 2008
8.4
C
745 GINGA COPPER
IMO 9829758
25,183 2019
8.4
C
746 BOCHEM MUMBAI
IMO 9565637
33,636 2006
8.4
C
747 MTM HAMBURG
IMO 9379844
19,997 2008
8.4
C
748 HTM WARRIOR
IMO 9399911
50,576 2009
8.4
C
749 GINGA LINGER
IMO 9893448
25,064 2021
8.5
C
750 CAIFU CHAO
IMO 9725823
19,998 2015
8.5
C
Page 15 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.